{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术后激素治疗与补救性放疗:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Reyhaneh Bayani, Kasra Kolahdouzan, Sepehr Nayebirad, Naeim Nabian, Fatemeh Jafari, Reza Ghalehtaki, Filippo Alongi, Nima Mousavi Darzikolaee","doi":"10.1002/pros.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salvage radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), yet the efficacy of concurrent hormone therapy remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the impact of adding hormone therapy to adjuvant or salvage RT on key survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries for randomized phase 2 or 3 trials comparing RT alone versus RT with hormone therapy (anti-androgens or androgen deprivation therapy) in patients undergoing RP. A random-effects meta-analysis with the inverse variance method was performed for overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after extracting the corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four trials with generally low risk of bias were identified. Pooled HRs were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72-0.99) for OS, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96) for MFS, and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.51-0.66) for PFS, favoring hormone therapy. Following a sensitivity analysis that excluded the results of one of the four trials, the significance for OS was no longer observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hormone therapy with post-RP RT significantly improves OS, MFS, and PFS in prostate cancer patients. Although the benefit in OS appears less robust, these findings support the significant role of hormone therapy in delaying disease progression. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024597336.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hormone Therapy With Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Reyhaneh Bayani, Kasra Kolahdouzan, Sepehr Nayebirad, Naeim Nabian, Fatemeh Jafari, Reza Ghalehtaki, Filippo Alongi, Nima Mousavi Darzikolaee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salvage radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), yet the efficacy of concurrent hormone therapy remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the impact of adding hormone therapy to adjuvant or salvage RT on key survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries for randomized phase 2 or 3 trials comparing RT alone versus RT with hormone therapy (anti-androgens or androgen deprivation therapy) in patients undergoing RP. A random-effects meta-analysis with the inverse variance method was performed for overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after extracting the corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four trials with generally low risk of bias were identified. Pooled HRs were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72-0.99) for OS, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96) for MFS, and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.51-0.66) for PFS, favoring hormone therapy. Following a sensitivity analysis that excluded the results of one of the four trials, the significance for OS was no longer observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hormone therapy with post-RP RT significantly improves OS, MFS, and PFS in prostate cancer patients. Although the benefit in OS appears less robust, these findings support the significant role of hormone therapy in delaying disease progression. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024597336.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:补救性放疗(RT)是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后非转移性前列腺癌复发的标准治疗方法,但同期激素治疗的疗效仍存在争议。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了在辅助或补救性放疗中加入激素治疗对关键生存结局的影响。方法:我们检索了PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和临床试验注册表,以比较RP患者单独RT与激素治疗(抗雄激素或雄激素剥夺治疗)的随机2期或3期试验。在提取相应的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)后,采用逆方差法对总生存期(OS)、无转移生存期(MFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:确定了4项偏倚风险普遍较低的试验。OS的合并hr为0.85 (95% CI: 0.72-0.99), MFS的合并hr为0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96), PFS的合并hr为0.58 (95% CI: 0.51-0.66),均支持激素治疗。在进行敏感性分析后,排除了四项试验中的一项的结果,不再观察到OS的意义。结论:激素治疗联合rp后放疗可显著改善前列腺癌患者的OS、MFS和PFS。尽管对OS的益处似乎不那么明显,但这些发现支持激素治疗在延缓疾病进展方面的重要作用。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024597336。
Hormone Therapy With Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Salvage radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), yet the efficacy of concurrent hormone therapy remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the impact of adding hormone therapy to adjuvant or salvage RT on key survival outcomes.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries for randomized phase 2 or 3 trials comparing RT alone versus RT with hormone therapy (anti-androgens or androgen deprivation therapy) in patients undergoing RP. A random-effects meta-analysis with the inverse variance method was performed for overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after extracting the corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Four trials with generally low risk of bias were identified. Pooled HRs were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72-0.99) for OS, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96) for MFS, and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.51-0.66) for PFS, favoring hormone therapy. Following a sensitivity analysis that excluded the results of one of the four trials, the significance for OS was no longer observed.
Conclusion: Hormone therapy with post-RP RT significantly improves OS, MFS, and PFS in prostate cancer patients. Although the benefit in OS appears less robust, these findings support the significant role of hormone therapy in delaying disease progression. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024597336.
期刊介绍:
The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.