年龄歧视对老年人数字参与的潜在负面影响:一项元分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
HaiYang Huang, LiJun Chen
{"title":"年龄歧视对老年人数字参与的潜在负面影响:一项元分析。","authors":"HaiYang Huang, LiJun Chen","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older adults, often referred to as \"digital immigrants,\" face persistent digital exclusion. Despite growing attention, ageism's role in shaping their digital engagement remains unclear with inconsistent findings. Applying the Ageism Generation Model, this meta-analysis examines ageism-digital participation linkages to address critical psychological barriers, and further to improve the old people's digital participation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We meta-analyzed 21 studies (72 effect size, N = 194,468) on adults aged 60+, using a random-effects mode. Eligible publications provided empirical data on ageism-digital participation links. To explore the potential moderators, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relatively weak negative association was observed between ageism and digital service usage among older adults (r = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.18, -0.09]). Further analysis revealed that this relationship was moderated by education level, chronological age, and cultural background, suggesting that sociodemographic factors shaped the impact of ageism on digital exclusion. While gender failed to independently moderate the ageism-digital participation linkage among old adults, it interacted with cultural context and age demonstrated significant moderation.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study observed a weak but significant associations between digital participation and both self- and other-directed ageism among older adults, underscoring the operationalization of self-fulfilling prophecies within the Ageism Generation Model framework. The study clarified the psychological mechanisms behind the digital divide and provided a foundation for interventions aimed at fostering positive attitudes toward technology among older adults. These insights are critical for policymakers and practitioners seeking to promote equitable digital inclusion in an aging society.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Potential Negative Effects of Ageism on Digital Engagement of Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"HaiYang Huang, LiJun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older adults, often referred to as \\\"digital immigrants,\\\" face persistent digital exclusion. Despite growing attention, ageism's role in shaping their digital engagement remains unclear with inconsistent findings. Applying the Ageism Generation Model, this meta-analysis examines ageism-digital participation linkages to address critical psychological barriers, and further to improve the old people's digital participation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We meta-analyzed 21 studies (72 effect size, N = 194,468) on adults aged 60+, using a random-effects mode. Eligible publications provided empirical data on ageism-digital participation links. To explore the potential moderators, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relatively weak negative association was observed between ageism and digital service usage among older adults (r = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.18, -0.09]). Further analysis revealed that this relationship was moderated by education level, chronological age, and cultural background, suggesting that sociodemographic factors shaped the impact of ageism on digital exclusion. While gender failed to independently moderate the ageism-digital participation linkage among old adults, it interacted with cultural context and age demonstrated significant moderation.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study observed a weak but significant associations between digital participation and both self- and other-directed ageism among older adults, underscoring the operationalization of self-fulfilling prophecies within the Ageism Generation Model framework. The study clarified the psychological mechanisms behind the digital divide and provided a foundation for interventions aimed at fostering positive attitudes toward technology among older adults. These insights are critical for policymakers and practitioners seeking to promote equitable digital inclusion in an aging society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:老年人,通常被称为“数字移民”,面临着持续的数字排斥。尽管越来越多的人关注,但年龄歧视在影响他们的数字参与方面的作用仍不清楚,调查结果也不一致。运用年龄歧视生成模型,本荟萃分析探讨了年龄与数字参与的联系,以解决关键的心理障碍,并进一步提高老年人的数字参与。研究设计和方法:采用随机效应模式,对21项研究(72项效应量,N = 194,468)进行meta分析,研究对象为60岁以上的成年人。符合条件的出版物提供了关于性别歧视与数字参与联系的经验数据。为了探索潜在的调节因素,进行了meta回归和亚组分析。结果:年龄歧视与老年人数字服务使用之间存在相对弱的负相关(r = -0.13, 95% CI[-0.18, -0.09])。进一步的分析表明,这种关系受到教育水平、实足年龄和文化背景的调节,表明社会人口因素塑造了年龄歧视对数字排斥的影响。虽然性别不能独立调节老年人的年龄-数字参与联系,但它与文化背景和年龄相互作用,表现出显著的调节作用。讨论与启示:本研究观察到数字参与与老年人自我和他人导向的年龄歧视之间存在微弱但显著的关联,强调了年龄歧视生成模型框架内自我实现预言的可操作性。该研究阐明了数字鸿沟背后的心理机制,并为旨在培养老年人对技术的积极态度的干预措施提供了基础。这些见解对于寻求在老龄化社会中促进公平的数字包容的政策制定者和实践者至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Potential Negative Effects of Ageism on Digital Engagement of Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis.

Background and objectives: Older adults, often referred to as "digital immigrants," face persistent digital exclusion. Despite growing attention, ageism's role in shaping their digital engagement remains unclear with inconsistent findings. Applying the Ageism Generation Model, this meta-analysis examines ageism-digital participation linkages to address critical psychological barriers, and further to improve the old people's digital participation.

Research design and methods: We meta-analyzed 21 studies (72 effect size, N = 194,468) on adults aged 60+, using a random-effects mode. Eligible publications provided empirical data on ageism-digital participation links. To explore the potential moderators, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted.

Results: Relatively weak negative association was observed between ageism and digital service usage among older adults (r = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.18, -0.09]). Further analysis revealed that this relationship was moderated by education level, chronological age, and cultural background, suggesting that sociodemographic factors shaped the impact of ageism on digital exclusion. While gender failed to independently moderate the ageism-digital participation linkage among old adults, it interacted with cultural context and age demonstrated significant moderation.

Discussion and implications: This study observed a weak but significant associations between digital participation and both self- and other-directed ageism among older adults, underscoring the operationalization of self-fulfilling prophecies within the Ageism Generation Model framework. The study clarified the psychological mechanisms behind the digital divide and provided a foundation for interventions aimed at fostering positive attitudes toward technology among older adults. These insights are critical for policymakers and practitioners seeking to promote equitable digital inclusion in an aging society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信