预测腹腔镜脾切除术的手术复杂性:一种有效的术前评分系统。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Long-Jiang Chen, Su-Hang Chen, Yuan Fang, Zhi-Lin Wang, Guang-Bin Chen, Xiao-Ming Wang
{"title":"预测腹腔镜脾切除术的手术复杂性:一种有效的术前评分系统。","authors":"Long-Jiang Chen, Su-Hang Chen, Yuan Fang, Zhi-Lin Wang, Guang-Bin Chen, Xiao-Ming Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12180-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic splenectomy poses significant technical challenges due to variable splenic anatomy and patient-specific factors. A robust preoperative difficulty scoring system is essential to integrate critical predictors into a unified framework. This tool enables objective risk stratification, optimizes resource allocation, and enhances procedural safety through tailored surgical strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel preoperative scoring system tailored to these challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this dual-center retrospective study, 181 patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy were divided into training (n = 118), validation 1 (n = 40), and validation 2 (n = 23) cohorts. Preoperative variables, including demographics, laboratory factors (INR, platelet count, et al.), and imaging indicators (CT-derived thickness, length, width, et al.), were analyzed. Multivariable regression identified predictors of surgical complexity (blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery). A difficulty score integrating regression coefficients and clinical feasibility was developed and validated using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, INR, splenic thickness, and cirrhosis-related hypersplenism emerged as independent predictors of surgical complexity (p < 0.05). The scoring system (range: 0-23) stratified patients into low- (0-7), intermediate- (8-15), and high-risk (16-23) tiers, demonstrating strong discrimination [training cohort AUC: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.90); validation 1 cohort AUC: 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.94); validation 2 cohort AUC: 0.78 (95% CI 0.58-0.98)]. High-risk patients exhibited significantly greater blood loss, prolonged operative time, and higher conversion to open surgery rates. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed clinical utility, with net benefit surpassing \"treat-all\" strategies across risk thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoring system provides a validated tool for preoperative risk stratification in laparoscopic splenectomy, particularly for cirrhosis-predominant cohorts. By incorporating age, INR, splenic thickness, and pathogenesis, it attempts to account for regional epidemiological variations, potentially contributing to more tailored surgical planning in specific clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting operative complexity in laparoscopic splenectomy: a validated preoperative scoring system.\",\"authors\":\"Long-Jiang Chen, Su-Hang Chen, Yuan Fang, Zhi-Lin Wang, Guang-Bin Chen, Xiao-Ming Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12180-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic splenectomy poses significant technical challenges due to variable splenic anatomy and patient-specific factors. A robust preoperative difficulty scoring system is essential to integrate critical predictors into a unified framework. This tool enables objective risk stratification, optimizes resource allocation, and enhances procedural safety through tailored surgical strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel preoperative scoring system tailored to these challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this dual-center retrospective study, 181 patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy were divided into training (n = 118), validation 1 (n = 40), and validation 2 (n = 23) cohorts. Preoperative variables, including demographics, laboratory factors (INR, platelet count, et al.), and imaging indicators (CT-derived thickness, length, width, et al.), were analyzed. Multivariable regression identified predictors of surgical complexity (blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery). A difficulty score integrating regression coefficients and clinical feasibility was developed and validated using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, INR, splenic thickness, and cirrhosis-related hypersplenism emerged as independent predictors of surgical complexity (p < 0.05). The scoring system (range: 0-23) stratified patients into low- (0-7), intermediate- (8-15), and high-risk (16-23) tiers, demonstrating strong discrimination [training cohort AUC: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.90); validation 1 cohort AUC: 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.94); validation 2 cohort AUC: 0.78 (95% CI 0.58-0.98)]. High-risk patients exhibited significantly greater blood loss, prolonged operative time, and higher conversion to open surgery rates. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed clinical utility, with net benefit surpassing \\\"treat-all\\\" strategies across risk thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoring system provides a validated tool for preoperative risk stratification in laparoscopic splenectomy, particularly for cirrhosis-predominant cohorts. By incorporating age, INR, splenic thickness, and pathogenesis, it attempts to account for regional epidemiological variations, potentially contributing to more tailored surgical planning in specific clinical contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12180-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12180-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于多变的脾解剖结构和患者特异性因素,腹腔镜脾切除术带来了重大的技术挑战。一个强大的术前难度评分系统对于将关键预测因素整合到一个统一的框架中至关重要。该工具可以实现客观的风险分层,优化资源分配,并通过量身定制的手术策略提高手术安全性。本研究旨在开发和验证一种针对这些挑战的新型术前评分系统。方法:在这项双中心回顾性研究中,181例接受腹腔镜脾切除术的患者被分为训练组(118例)、验证组1(40例)和验证组2(23例)。分析术前变量,包括人口统计学、实验室因素(INR、血小板计数等)和影像学指标(ct衍生的厚度、长度、宽度等)。多变量回归确定了手术复杂性的预测因素(出血量、手术时间、转为开放手术)。通过ROC曲线、校正图和决策曲线分析,建立了难度评分,并结合回归系数和临床可行性进行了验证。结果:年龄、INR、脾脏厚度和肝硬化相关的脾功能异常是手术复杂性的独立预测因素(p)。结论:该评分系统为腹腔镜脾切除术的术前风险分层提供了一种有效的工具,特别是对于肝硬化为主的队列。通过结合年龄、INR、脾脏厚度和发病机制,它试图解释区域流行病学差异,可能有助于在特定的临床情况下制定更有针对性的手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting operative complexity in laparoscopic splenectomy: a validated preoperative scoring system.

Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy poses significant technical challenges due to variable splenic anatomy and patient-specific factors. A robust preoperative difficulty scoring system is essential to integrate critical predictors into a unified framework. This tool enables objective risk stratification, optimizes resource allocation, and enhances procedural safety through tailored surgical strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel preoperative scoring system tailored to these challenges.

Methods: In this dual-center retrospective study, 181 patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy were divided into training (n = 118), validation 1 (n = 40), and validation 2 (n = 23) cohorts. Preoperative variables, including demographics, laboratory factors (INR, platelet count, et al.), and imaging indicators (CT-derived thickness, length, width, et al.), were analyzed. Multivariable regression identified predictors of surgical complexity (blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery). A difficulty score integrating regression coefficients and clinical feasibility was developed and validated using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.

Results: Age, INR, splenic thickness, and cirrhosis-related hypersplenism emerged as independent predictors of surgical complexity (p < 0.05). The scoring system (range: 0-23) stratified patients into low- (0-7), intermediate- (8-15), and high-risk (16-23) tiers, demonstrating strong discrimination [training cohort AUC: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.90); validation 1 cohort AUC: 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.94); validation 2 cohort AUC: 0.78 (95% CI 0.58-0.98)]. High-risk patients exhibited significantly greater blood loss, prolonged operative time, and higher conversion to open surgery rates. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed clinical utility, with net benefit surpassing "treat-all" strategies across risk thresholds.

Conclusions: This scoring system provides a validated tool for preoperative risk stratification in laparoscopic splenectomy, particularly for cirrhosis-predominant cohorts. By incorporating age, INR, splenic thickness, and pathogenesis, it attempts to account for regional epidemiological variations, potentially contributing to more tailored surgical planning in specific clinical contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信