急性结石性胆囊炎患者经皮胆囊造瘘术后行间歇胆囊切除术的障碍。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sourav Podder, Kirsten Lung, George Ibrahim, Scott Koeneman, Joshua Marks, Murray Cohen, Anirudh Kohli
{"title":"急性结石性胆囊炎患者经皮胆囊造瘘术后行间歇胆囊切除术的障碍。","authors":"Sourav Podder, Kirsten Lung, George Ibrahim, Scott Koeneman, Joshua Marks, Murray Cohen, Anirudh Kohli","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12161-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT) is an option for acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. While PCT effectively manages acute episodes by providing source control, the management after PCT remains unclear. When feasible, subsequent interval cholecystectomy (IC) offers definitive disease resolution; however, clear guidelines for patient selection remain lacking. This study identifies factors that hinder the decision to proceed with IC, investigates whether IC after PCT is associated with improved survival, and assesses the incidence of subsequent biliary procedures after PCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using deidentified data from the TriNetX platform, encompassing over 100 million patients. Patients diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent PCT were identified. The primary outcome was the identification of factors associated with the failure to undergo IC after PCT. Secondary outcomes included assessing the hazard of death associated with IC, modeling IC as a time-varying covariate. Additionally, biliary interventions following PCT were quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 419,102 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis, 8,483 (2.0%) underwent PCT. Of these, 43.0% subsequently underwent IC within one year. Patients with chronic ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, diabetes, and concurrent diagnosis of septic shock were less likely to undergo IC. Additionally, 40.9% of patients required at least one additional biliary intervention within one year following PCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than half of patients do not undergo IC after PCT. Patients with comorbidities such as chronic ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, diabetes, and concurrent diagnosis of septic shock are associated with failure to undergo IC. Moreover, patients who undergo PCT frequently require additional biliary interventions. This highlights the need for improved patient selection, structured follow-up, and optimization strategies to facilitate IC when feasible. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for managing comorbidities, increasing surgical eligibility, and ultimately improving outcomes for patients undergoing PCT for acute calculous cholecystitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to interval cholecystectomy following percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.\",\"authors\":\"Sourav Podder, Kirsten Lung, George Ibrahim, Scott Koeneman, Joshua Marks, Murray Cohen, Anirudh Kohli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12161-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT) is an option for acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. While PCT effectively manages acute episodes by providing source control, the management after PCT remains unclear. When feasible, subsequent interval cholecystectomy (IC) offers definitive disease resolution; however, clear guidelines for patient selection remain lacking. This study identifies factors that hinder the decision to proceed with IC, investigates whether IC after PCT is associated with improved survival, and assesses the incidence of subsequent biliary procedures after PCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using deidentified data from the TriNetX platform, encompassing over 100 million patients. Patients diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent PCT were identified. The primary outcome was the identification of factors associated with the failure to undergo IC after PCT. Secondary outcomes included assessing the hazard of death associated with IC, modeling IC as a time-varying covariate. Additionally, biliary interventions following PCT were quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 419,102 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis, 8,483 (2.0%) underwent PCT. Of these, 43.0% subsequently underwent IC within one year. Patients with chronic ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, diabetes, and concurrent diagnosis of septic shock were less likely to undergo IC. Additionally, 40.9% of patients required at least one additional biliary intervention within one year following PCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than half of patients do not undergo IC after PCT. Patients with comorbidities such as chronic ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, diabetes, and concurrent diagnosis of septic shock are associated with failure to undergo IC. Moreover, patients who undergo PCT frequently require additional biliary interventions. This highlights the need for improved patient selection, structured follow-up, and optimization strategies to facilitate IC when feasible. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for managing comorbidities, increasing surgical eligibility, and ultimately improving outcomes for patients undergoing PCT for acute calculous cholecystitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12161-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12161-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮胆囊造瘘术(PCT)是治疗高危外科患者急性结石性胆囊炎的一种选择。虽然PCT通过提供源头控制有效地管理急性发作,但PCT后的管理仍不清楚。如果可行,随后的间隔胆囊切除术(IC)提供明确的疾病解决方案;然而,仍然缺乏明确的患者选择指南。本研究确定了阻碍IC决定进行的因素,调查了PCT后IC是否与生存率提高有关,并评估了PCT后后续胆道手术的发生率。方法:使用来自TriNetX平台的未确定数据进行回顾性队列研究,包括超过1亿患者。诊断为急性结石性胆囊炎的患者接受了PCT检查。主要结局是确定与PCT后未能接受IC相关的因素,次要结局包括评估与IC相关的死亡风险,将IC建模为时变协变量。此外,对PCT后的胆道干预进行量化。结果:419102例急性结石性胆囊炎患者中,8483例(2.0%)行PCT,其中43.0%在一年内行IC。慢性缺血性心脏病、充血性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、腹水、糖尿病和并发感染性休克的患者接受IC的可能性较小。此外,40.9%的患者在pct后一年内至少需要一次额外的胆道干预。有合并症的患者,如慢性缺血性心脏病、充血性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、腹水、糖尿病和并发感染性休克的患者,都与不能接受IC相关。此外,接受PCT的患者经常需要额外的胆道干预。这突出了改进患者选择、结构化随访和优化策略的必要性,以便在可行的情况下促进IC。多学科方法对于管理合并症,提高手术资格,并最终改善急性结石性胆囊炎患者接受PCT治疗的结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to interval cholecystectomy following percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.

Background: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT) is an option for acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. While PCT effectively manages acute episodes by providing source control, the management after PCT remains unclear. When feasible, subsequent interval cholecystectomy (IC) offers definitive disease resolution; however, clear guidelines for patient selection remain lacking. This study identifies factors that hinder the decision to proceed with IC, investigates whether IC after PCT is associated with improved survival, and assesses the incidence of subsequent biliary procedures after PCT.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using deidentified data from the TriNetX platform, encompassing over 100 million patients. Patients diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent PCT were identified. The primary outcome was the identification of factors associated with the failure to undergo IC after PCT. Secondary outcomes included assessing the hazard of death associated with IC, modeling IC as a time-varying covariate. Additionally, biliary interventions following PCT were quantified.

Results: Among 419,102 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis, 8,483 (2.0%) underwent PCT. Of these, 43.0% subsequently underwent IC within one year. Patients with chronic ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, diabetes, and concurrent diagnosis of septic shock were less likely to undergo IC. Additionally, 40.9% of patients required at least one additional biliary intervention within one year following PCT.

Conclusion: More than half of patients do not undergo IC after PCT. Patients with comorbidities such as chronic ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, diabetes, and concurrent diagnosis of septic shock are associated with failure to undergo IC. Moreover, patients who undergo PCT frequently require additional biliary interventions. This highlights the need for improved patient selection, structured follow-up, and optimization strategies to facilitate IC when feasible. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for managing comorbidities, increasing surgical eligibility, and ultimately improving outcomes for patients undergoing PCT for acute calculous cholecystitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信