对“纵向数据用于临床试验分析的新型非线性模型:频率和贝叶斯方法同时使用SAS教程”的评论”的回复

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Guoqiao Wang, Guogen Shan, Yan Li, Yijie Liao, Lon Schneider, Gary Cutter
{"title":"对“纵向数据用于临床试验分析的新型非线性模型:频率和贝叶斯方法同时使用SAS教程”的评论”的回复","authors":"Guoqiao Wang, Guogen Shan, Yan Li, Yijie Liao, Lon Schneider, Gary Cutter","doi":"10.1002/sim.70266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical trials with longitudinal continuous data, efficacy inference traditionally focuses on the difference in the mean change from baseline at a single study visit [e.g., mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM)]. Proportional MMRM (pMMRM) reparameterizes this difference as a proportional reduction relative to the placebo mean change. This proportional effect is a nonlinear combination of the means, whereas the difference is a linear combination of the means. It can not only lead to greater power at a single visit by yielding a test statistic lower-bounded by that of the difference but also offers a flexible and intuitive way to combine all or multiple visits for efficacy inference, which can further boost power. It is also asymptotically unbiased. pMMRM with visit-specific proportional effects yields identical parameter estimates to MMRM. When only MMRM outputs are used, the proportional effect calculated by the delta method yields greater power than the difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 20-22","pages":"e70266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Letter to the Editor \\\"Comments on 'Novel Non-Linear Models for Clinical Trial Analysis With Longitudinal Data: A Tutorial Using SAS for Both Frequentist and Bayesian Methods'\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Guoqiao Wang, Guogen Shan, Yan Li, Yijie Liao, Lon Schneider, Gary Cutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sim.70266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In clinical trials with longitudinal continuous data, efficacy inference traditionally focuses on the difference in the mean change from baseline at a single study visit [e.g., mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM)]. Proportional MMRM (pMMRM) reparameterizes this difference as a proportional reduction relative to the placebo mean change. This proportional effect is a nonlinear combination of the means, whereas the difference is a linear combination of the means. It can not only lead to greater power at a single visit by yielding a test statistic lower-bounded by that of the difference but also offers a flexible and intuitive way to combine all or multiple visits for efficacy inference, which can further boost power. It is also asymptotically unbiased. pMMRM with visit-specific proportional effects yields identical parameter estimates to MMRM. When only MMRM outputs are used, the proportional effect calculated by the delta method yields greater power than the difference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 20-22\",\"pages\":\"e70266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在具有纵向连续数据的临床试验中,疗效推断传统上侧重于单次研究访问中与基线的平均变化的差异[例如,重复测量混合模型(MMRM)]。比例MMRM (pMMRM)将这种差异重新参数化为相对于安慰剂平均变化的比例减少。这种比例效应是均值的非线性组合,而差异是均值的线性组合。它不仅可以在单次访问时产生比差值低的测试统计量,而且还提供了一种灵活直观的方法来结合所有或多次访问进行功效推断,这可以进一步提高功率。它也是渐近无偏的。具有访问特定比例效应的pMMRM与MMRM产生相同的参数估计。当仅使用MMRM输出时,由delta方法计算的比例效应产生的功率大于差值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to Letter to the Editor "Comments on 'Novel Non-Linear Models for Clinical Trial Analysis With Longitudinal Data: A Tutorial Using SAS for Both Frequentist and Bayesian Methods'".

In clinical trials with longitudinal continuous data, efficacy inference traditionally focuses on the difference in the mean change from baseline at a single study visit [e.g., mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM)]. Proportional MMRM (pMMRM) reparameterizes this difference as a proportional reduction relative to the placebo mean change. This proportional effect is a nonlinear combination of the means, whereas the difference is a linear combination of the means. It can not only lead to greater power at a single visit by yielding a test statistic lower-bounded by that of the difference but also offers a flexible and intuitive way to combine all or multiple visits for efficacy inference, which can further boost power. It is also asymptotically unbiased. pMMRM with visit-specific proportional effects yields identical parameter estimates to MMRM. When only MMRM outputs are used, the proportional effect calculated by the delta method yields greater power than the difference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信