Marco Falcone, Xiyu Bao, Fionn Woodcock, Roberto Di Virgilio, Maria Alejandra Vidal Pereira, Michal Kantecki, Maria Gheorghe
{"title":"Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI)与粘菌素+美罗培南(COL + MER)治疗意大利产金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)肠杆菌感染的成本-效果分析","authors":"Marco Falcone, Xiyu Bao, Fionn Woodcock, Roberto Di Virgilio, Maria Alejandra Vidal Pereira, Michal Kantecki, Maria Gheorghe","doi":"10.1007/s40273-025-01528-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a novel combination antibiotic approved in Europe for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia; complicated urinary tract infection, including pyelonephritis and for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms with limited treatment options. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of ATM-AVI ± metronidazole versus colistin + meropenem (COL + MER) for the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, including infections with suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from the public payer perspective in Italy using phase III trial data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cost-effectiveness analysis adopted a decision tree model to simulate the clinical pathway of complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, followed by a Markov model to capture lifetime health outcomes on cured patients, with costs valued in 2024 Euros and discounted at 3%. The model captures the impact of resistant pathogens and side effects (i.e. nephrotoxicity). Model uncertainty was assessed using a probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ATM-AVI treatment sequence (ATM-AVI ± metronidazole followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure) had improved clinical outcomes and higher cure rates, shorter hospital stays and higher quality-adjusted life-year gains compared with the COL + MER sequence (COL + MER followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the ATM-AVI sequence was dominant for complicated intra-abdominal infection and was €1552 per quality-adjusted life-year for hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 in Italy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis suggests that ATM-AVI is expected to be a cost-effective use of Italian healthcare resources for treating suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, including complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) Versus Colistin + Meropenem (COL + MER) for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL)-Producing Enterobacterales in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Falcone, Xiyu Bao, Fionn Woodcock, Roberto Di Virgilio, Maria Alejandra Vidal Pereira, Michal Kantecki, Maria Gheorghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40273-025-01528-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a novel combination antibiotic approved in Europe for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia; complicated urinary tract infection, including pyelonephritis and for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms with limited treatment options. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of ATM-AVI ± metronidazole versus colistin + meropenem (COL + MER) for the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, including infections with suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from the public payer perspective in Italy using phase III trial data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cost-effectiveness analysis adopted a decision tree model to simulate the clinical pathway of complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, followed by a Markov model to capture lifetime health outcomes on cured patients, with costs valued in 2024 Euros and discounted at 3%. The model captures the impact of resistant pathogens and side effects (i.e. nephrotoxicity). Model uncertainty was assessed using a probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ATM-AVI treatment sequence (ATM-AVI ± metronidazole followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure) had improved clinical outcomes and higher cure rates, shorter hospital stays and higher quality-adjusted life-year gains compared with the COL + MER sequence (COL + MER followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the ATM-AVI sequence was dominant for complicated intra-abdominal infection and was €1552 per quality-adjusted life-year for hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 in Italy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis suggests that ATM-AVI is expected to be a cost-effective use of Italian healthcare resources for treating suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, including complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01528-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01528-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI)是一种新型联合抗生素,在欧洲被批准用于治疗复杂的腹腔感染、医院获得性肺炎(包括呼吸机相关性肺炎);复杂性尿路感染,包括肾盂肾炎和需氧革兰氏阴性菌感染,治疗方案有限。该分析评估了ATM-AVI±甲硝唑与粘菌素+美罗培南(COL + MER)治疗复杂腹腔感染和医院获得性肺炎/呼吸机相关性肺炎患者的成本效益,包括从意大利公共付款人的角度使用怀疑产生金属β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌感染的III期试验数据。方法:成本-效果分析采用决策树模型模拟复杂腹内感染和医院获得性肺炎/呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床路径,采用马尔可夫模型捕获治愈患者终身健康结局,成本估值为2024欧元,折现率为3%。该模型捕捉到耐药病原体的影响和副作用(即肾毒性)。使用概率和确定性敏感性分析评估模型的不确定性。结果:与COL + MER (COL + MER治疗失败后加头孢地罗)相比,ATM-AVI治疗序列(ATM-AVI±甲硝唑加头孢地罗)具有更好的临床结果和更高的治愈率、更短的住院时间和更高的质量调整生命年增益。在复杂的腹腔感染中,ATM-AVI序列的增量成本效益比占主导地位,对于医院获得性肺炎/呼吸机相关肺炎,每个质量调整生命年的成本效益比为1552欧元,远低于意大利30,000欧元的支付意愿阈值。结论:我们的分析表明,ATM-AVI有望成为一种具有成本效益的意大利医疗资源,用于治疗可疑的产生金属β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌,包括复杂的腹腔感染和医院获得性肺炎/呼吸机相关性肺炎。
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) Versus Colistin + Meropenem (COL + MER) for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL)-Producing Enterobacterales in Italy.
Background and objective: Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a novel combination antibiotic approved in Europe for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia; complicated urinary tract infection, including pyelonephritis and for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms with limited treatment options. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of ATM-AVI ± metronidazole versus colistin + meropenem (COL + MER) for the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, including infections with suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from the public payer perspective in Italy using phase III trial data.
Methods: The cost-effectiveness analysis adopted a decision tree model to simulate the clinical pathway of complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, followed by a Markov model to capture lifetime health outcomes on cured patients, with costs valued in 2024 Euros and discounted at 3%. The model captures the impact of resistant pathogens and side effects (i.e. nephrotoxicity). Model uncertainty was assessed using a probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis.
Results: The ATM-AVI treatment sequence (ATM-AVI ± metronidazole followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure) had improved clinical outcomes and higher cure rates, shorter hospital stays and higher quality-adjusted life-year gains compared with the COL + MER sequence (COL + MER followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the ATM-AVI sequence was dominant for complicated intra-abdominal infection and was €1552 per quality-adjusted life-year for hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 in Italy.
Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that ATM-AVI is expected to be a cost-effective use of Italian healthcare resources for treating suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, including complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia.
期刊介绍:
PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker.
PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization.
PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.