Abdullah Tasci, Ecem Deniz Kirkpantur Tasci, Cansu Arslan Turan, Tuba Cimilli Ozturk
{"title":"大鼠急性吡格列酮中毒:静脉注射脂质乳缺乏保护作用的初步研究。","authors":"Abdullah Tasci, Ecem Deniz Kirkpantur Tasci, Cansu Arslan Turan, Tuba Cimilli Ozturk","doi":"10.1002/jat.4939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is an established antidote for local anesthetic systemic toxicity and has been tested in various lipophilic drug intoxications, but its efficacy in pioglitazone toxicity remains unclear. This study evaluated the biochemical and histopathological effects of pioglitazone and the potential protective role of ILE in an animal model. Thirty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 8): control, ILE (12.4 mL/kg, 20% IV), pioglitazone (PIO; ½ LD<sub>50</sub>, 1000 mg/kg), and PIO + ILE. ILE (or saline) was administered intravenously over ~2 min immediately after pioglitazone, with matched volume and duration. Animals were observed for 24 h with free access to food and water. At 24 h, rats were decapitated, and blood and tissue samples were analyzed. Pioglitazone induced significant hepatic and renal injury (both p < 0.001), while cardiac changes were minimal and nonsignificant. ILE administration did not reduce liver or kidney injury. The ILE-only group showed higher renal injury versus controls (p < 0.001). Serum biochemistry revealed increased BUN and creatinine in PIO + ILE compared with Control and ILE (adjusted p < 0.05), with no difference between PIO and PIO + ILE. ILE failed to reverse hepatic or renal injury in acute pioglitazone toxicity and was associated with potential nephrotoxic effects. These findings suggest limited utility of ILE for pioglitazone overdose, likely reflecting drug physicochemical properties (moderate lipophilicity and high protein binding) and timing/dosing constraints. Caution is warranted, particularly regarding renal effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Pioglitazone Intoxication in Rats: Lack of Protective Effect of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion-A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Tasci, Ecem Deniz Kirkpantur Tasci, Cansu Arslan Turan, Tuba Cimilli Ozturk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jat.4939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is an established antidote for local anesthetic systemic toxicity and has been tested in various lipophilic drug intoxications, but its efficacy in pioglitazone toxicity remains unclear. This study evaluated the biochemical and histopathological effects of pioglitazone and the potential protective role of ILE in an animal model. Thirty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 8): control, ILE (12.4 mL/kg, 20% IV), pioglitazone (PIO; ½ LD<sub>50</sub>, 1000 mg/kg), and PIO + ILE. ILE (or saline) was administered intravenously over ~2 min immediately after pioglitazone, with matched volume and duration. Animals were observed for 24 h with free access to food and water. At 24 h, rats were decapitated, and blood and tissue samples were analyzed. Pioglitazone induced significant hepatic and renal injury (both p < 0.001), while cardiac changes were minimal and nonsignificant. ILE administration did not reduce liver or kidney injury. The ILE-only group showed higher renal injury versus controls (p < 0.001). Serum biochemistry revealed increased BUN and creatinine in PIO + ILE compared with Control and ILE (adjusted p < 0.05), with no difference between PIO and PIO + ILE. ILE failed to reverse hepatic or renal injury in acute pioglitazone toxicity and was associated with potential nephrotoxic effects. These findings suggest limited utility of ILE for pioglitazone overdose, likely reflecting drug physicochemical properties (moderate lipophilicity and high protein binding) and timing/dosing constraints. Caution is warranted, particularly regarding renal effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4939\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Acute Pioglitazone Intoxication in Rats: Lack of Protective Effect of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion-A Pilot Study.
Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is an established antidote for local anesthetic systemic toxicity and has been tested in various lipophilic drug intoxications, but its efficacy in pioglitazone toxicity remains unclear. This study evaluated the biochemical and histopathological effects of pioglitazone and the potential protective role of ILE in an animal model. Thirty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 8): control, ILE (12.4 mL/kg, 20% IV), pioglitazone (PIO; ½ LD50, 1000 mg/kg), and PIO + ILE. ILE (or saline) was administered intravenously over ~2 min immediately after pioglitazone, with matched volume and duration. Animals were observed for 24 h with free access to food and water. At 24 h, rats were decapitated, and blood and tissue samples were analyzed. Pioglitazone induced significant hepatic and renal injury (both p < 0.001), while cardiac changes were minimal and nonsignificant. ILE administration did not reduce liver or kidney injury. The ILE-only group showed higher renal injury versus controls (p < 0.001). Serum biochemistry revealed increased BUN and creatinine in PIO + ILE compared with Control and ILE (adjusted p < 0.05), with no difference between PIO and PIO + ILE. ILE failed to reverse hepatic or renal injury in acute pioglitazone toxicity and was associated with potential nephrotoxic effects. These findings suggest limited utility of ILE for pioglitazone overdose, likely reflecting drug physicochemical properties (moderate lipophilicity and high protein binding) and timing/dosing constraints. Caution is warranted, particularly regarding renal effects.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed original reviews and hypothesis-driven research articles on mechanistic, fundamental and applied research relating to the toxicity of drugs and chemicals at the molecular, cellular, tissue, target organ and whole body level in vivo (by all relevant routes of exposure) and in vitro / ex vivo. All aspects of toxicology are covered (including but not limited to nanotoxicology, genomics and proteomics, teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, reproductive and endocrine toxicology, toxicopathology, target organ toxicity, systems toxicity (eg immunotoxicity), neurobehavioral toxicology, mechanistic studies, biochemical and molecular toxicology, novel biomarkers, pharmacokinetics/PBPK, risk assessment and environmental health studies) and emphasis is given to papers of clear application to human health, and/or advance mechanistic understanding and/or provide significant contributions and impact to their field.