P N Tshibuyl, P O R Olang, Omondi Ogutu, T M Chokwe
{"title":"两种单针脊髓阻滞方案对分娩后疼痛缓解效果的比较研究。","authors":"P N Tshibuyl, P O R Olang, Omondi Ogutu, T M Chokwe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most women experience moderate to severe pain during labour and delivery, often requiring some form of pharmacologic analgesia. The lack of proper psychological preparation combined with fear and anxiety can greatly enhance the patient's sensitivity to pain and further add to the discomfort. Skillfully conducted obstetric analgesia, in addition to relieving pain and anxiety, may benefit the mother by increasing self esteem and improving bonding with the baby.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and compare the satisfaction and efficacy of two regimens of single-shot spinal blocks for the relief of labor pain in women who present in active phase of labour.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomised single-blind observational study</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Labour ward of Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All consenting primiparous women presenting in active phase of labor with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at term (> 37 weeks) and in cephalic presentation, who reported a > 70 mm VAS (Visual Analog Scale) pain score at cervical dilatation ≥ 5 cm at the time of request for labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effective labour analgesia lasting up to 120 minutes was observed in the fentanyl-bupivacaine group but with high incidence of breakthrough pain. The fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine group had labour analgesia lasting up to 180 minutes or even more with a lower incidence of breakthrough pain. The one-minute and five- minute Apgar scores in the morphine group were significantly lower (p = 0.026 and 0.044 respectively) than in the fentanyl group but the difference in neonatal outcome had no clinical significance, and there were no significant differences in adverse effects, sensory levels, and motor power between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective analgesia for about 120 minutes was observed in the fentanyl-bupivacaine group with high incidence of breakthrough pain while the fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine group had labour analgesia prolonged up to more than three hours. The difference in fetal outcome had no clinical significance for the morphine group, and there were no significant difference in adverse effect, sensory levels, and motorpowerbetween the two groups. These findings show that intrathecal analgesia is safe and the use of the combination of fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine gives adequate and safe analgesia during labour and delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11399,"journal":{"name":"East African medical journal","volume":"90 1","pages":"12-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF TWO REGIMENS OF SINGLE- SHOT SPINAL BLOCK FOR PAIN RELIEF IN WOMEN PRESENTING IN ESTABLISHED LABOUR.\",\"authors\":\"P N Tshibuyl, P O R Olang, Omondi Ogutu, T M Chokwe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most women experience moderate to severe pain during labour and delivery, often requiring some form of pharmacologic analgesia. The lack of proper psychological preparation combined with fear and anxiety can greatly enhance the patient's sensitivity to pain and further add to the discomfort. Skillfully conducted obstetric analgesia, in addition to relieving pain and anxiety, may benefit the mother by increasing self esteem and improving bonding with the baby.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and compare the satisfaction and efficacy of two regimens of single-shot spinal blocks for the relief of labor pain in women who present in active phase of labour.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomised single-blind observational study</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Labour ward of Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All consenting primiparous women presenting in active phase of labor with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at term (> 37 weeks) and in cephalic presentation, who reported a > 70 mm VAS (Visual Analog Scale) pain score at cervical dilatation ≥ 5 cm at the time of request for labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effective labour analgesia lasting up to 120 minutes was observed in the fentanyl-bupivacaine group but with high incidence of breakthrough pain. The fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine group had labour analgesia lasting up to 180 minutes or even more with a lower incidence of breakthrough pain. The one-minute and five- minute Apgar scores in the morphine group were significantly lower (p = 0.026 and 0.044 respectively) than in the fentanyl group but the difference in neonatal outcome had no clinical significance, and there were no significant differences in adverse effects, sensory levels, and motor power between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective analgesia for about 120 minutes was observed in the fentanyl-bupivacaine group with high incidence of breakthrough pain while the fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine group had labour analgesia prolonged up to more than three hours. The difference in fetal outcome had no clinical significance for the morphine group, and there were no significant difference in adverse effect, sensory levels, and motorpowerbetween the two groups. These findings show that intrathecal analgesia is safe and the use of the combination of fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine gives adequate and safe analgesia during labour and delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East African medical journal\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"12-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East African medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:大多数妇女在分娩过程中经历中度至重度疼痛,通常需要某种形式的药物镇痛。缺乏适当的心理准备,加上恐惧和焦虑,会大大增强患者对疼痛的敏感性,进一步增加患者的不适感。熟练地实施产科镇痛,除了减轻疼痛和焦虑外,还可以通过增加母亲的自尊和改善与婴儿的联系而使母亲受益。目的:评价和比较两种单次脊髓阻滞方案缓解产程活跃期产妇阵痛的满意度和效果。设计:前瞻性随机单盲观察研究背景:内罗毕肯雅塔国家医院产房。受试者:所有同意产程活跃期无并发症单胎妊娠足月(bbb37周)和头位分娩的初产妇,在要求分娩镇痛时宫颈扩张≥5 cm处> 70 mm VAS(视觉模拟评分)疼痛评分。结果:芬太尼-布比卡因组分娩镇痛有效,持续时间长达120分钟,但突发性疼痛发生率高。芬太尼-布比卡因-吗啡组分娩镇痛持续时间可达180分钟甚至更长,突破性疼痛发生率较低。吗啡组1分钟和5分钟Apgar评分显著低于芬太尼组(p分别为0.026和0.044),但新生儿结局差异无临床意义,两组不良反应、感觉水平、运动功率差异无统计学意义。结论:芬太尼-布比卡因组有效镇痛约120分钟,突发性疼痛发生率高,芬太尼-布比卡因-吗啡组产程镇痛时间最长达3小时以上。吗啡组胎儿结局差异无临床意义,两组不良反应、感觉水平、运动能力差异无统计学意义。这些发现表明鞘内镇痛是安全的,芬太尼-布比卡因-吗啡联合使用可在分娩过程中提供充分和安全的镇痛。
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF TWO REGIMENS OF SINGLE- SHOT SPINAL BLOCK FOR PAIN RELIEF IN WOMEN PRESENTING IN ESTABLISHED LABOUR.
Background: Most women experience moderate to severe pain during labour and delivery, often requiring some form of pharmacologic analgesia. The lack of proper psychological preparation combined with fear and anxiety can greatly enhance the patient's sensitivity to pain and further add to the discomfort. Skillfully conducted obstetric analgesia, in addition to relieving pain and anxiety, may benefit the mother by increasing self esteem and improving bonding with the baby.
Objective: To assess and compare the satisfaction and efficacy of two regimens of single-shot spinal blocks for the relief of labor pain in women who present in active phase of labour.
Design: A prospective randomised single-blind observational study
Setting: Labour ward of Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi.
Subjects: All consenting primiparous women presenting in active phase of labor with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy at term (> 37 weeks) and in cephalic presentation, who reported a > 70 mm VAS (Visual Analog Scale) pain score at cervical dilatation ≥ 5 cm at the time of request for labour analgesia.
Results: Effective labour analgesia lasting up to 120 minutes was observed in the fentanyl-bupivacaine group but with high incidence of breakthrough pain. The fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine group had labour analgesia lasting up to 180 minutes or even more with a lower incidence of breakthrough pain. The one-minute and five- minute Apgar scores in the morphine group were significantly lower (p = 0.026 and 0.044 respectively) than in the fentanyl group but the difference in neonatal outcome had no clinical significance, and there were no significant differences in adverse effects, sensory levels, and motor power between the two groups.
Conclusion: Effective analgesia for about 120 minutes was observed in the fentanyl-bupivacaine group with high incidence of breakthrough pain while the fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine group had labour analgesia prolonged up to more than three hours. The difference in fetal outcome had no clinical significance for the morphine group, and there were no significant difference in adverse effect, sensory levels, and motorpowerbetween the two groups. These findings show that intrathecal analgesia is safe and the use of the combination of fentanyl-bupivacaine-morphine gives adequate and safe analgesia during labour and delivery.
期刊介绍:
The East African Medical Journal is published every month. It is intended for publication of papers on original work and reviews of all aspects of medicine. Communications bearing on clinical and basic research on problems relevant to East Africa and other African countries will receive special attention. Papers submitted for publication are accepted only on the understanding they will not be published elsewhere without the permission of the Editor-in-Chief