新包装,旧成分:RHEIA试验真正告诉我们关于女性TAVI的什么?

IF 0.6 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pradeep Narayan
{"title":"新包装,旧成分:RHEIA试验真正告诉我们关于女性TAVI的什么?","authors":"Pradeep Narayan","doi":"10.1007/s12055-025-02067-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis (RHEIA) trial is the first randomized study to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) exclusively in low-risk women with severe aortic stenosis. While results showed statistical superiority of TAVI for the composite endpoint of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year, this was driven primarily by reduced readmission rates. Mortality and stroke outcomes were similar between groups. Significant procedural imbalances and reliance on as-treated analysis raise concerns about interpretation. RHEIA not only fills a critical evidence gap in sex-specific valve therapy but also highlights persistent methodological challenges in evaluating treatment efficacy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13285,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"41 10","pages":"1513-1515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New packaging, old ingredients: what the RHEIA Trial really tells us about TAVI in women?\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Narayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12055-025-02067-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis (RHEIA) trial is the first randomized study to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) exclusively in low-risk women with severe aortic stenosis. While results showed statistical superiority of TAVI for the composite endpoint of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year, this was driven primarily by reduced readmission rates. Mortality and stroke outcomes were similar between groups. Significant procedural imbalances and reliance on as-treated analysis raise concerns about interpretation. RHEIA not only fills a critical evidence gap in sex-specific valve therapy but also highlights persistent methodological challenges in evaluating treatment efficacy in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 10\",\"pages\":\"1513-1515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-02067-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-02067-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

女性主动脉瓣狭窄随机研究(RHEIA)试验是首个比较经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)专门用于低危严重主动脉瓣狭窄女性的随机研究。虽然结果显示TAVI在死亡、卒中或1年后再住院的综合终点上具有统计学优势,但这主要是由于再入院率降低所致。两组之间的死亡率和中风结果相似。重大的程序失衡和对经处理分析的依赖引起了对解释的关注。RHEIA不仅填补了性别特异性瓣膜治疗的关键证据空白,而且强调了评估该人群治疗效果的持续方法学挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New packaging, old ingredients: what the RHEIA Trial really tells us about TAVI in women?

The Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis (RHEIA) trial is the first randomized study to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) exclusively in low-risk women with severe aortic stenosis. While results showed statistical superiority of TAVI for the composite endpoint of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year, this was driven primarily by reduced readmission rates. Mortality and stroke outcomes were similar between groups. Significant procedural imbalances and reliance on as-treated analysis raise concerns about interpretation. RHEIA not only fills a critical evidence gap in sex-specific valve therapy but also highlights persistent methodological challenges in evaluating treatment efficacy in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
141
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is education. The journal aims to dissipate current clinical practices and developments in the area of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. This includes information on cardiovascular epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestation etc. The journal accepts manuscripts from cardiovascular anaesthesia, cardiothoracic and vascular nursing and technology development and new/innovative products.The journal is the official publication of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons which has a membership of over 1000 at present.DescriptionThe journal is the official organ of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons. It was started in 1982 by Dr. Solomon Victor and ws being published twice a year up to 1996. From 2000 the editorial office moved to Delhi. From 2001 the journal was extended to quarterly and subsequently four issues annually have been printed out at time and regularly without fail. The journal receives manuscripts from members and non-members and cardiovascular surgeons. The manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two or sometimes three or four reviewers who are on the panel. The manuscript process is now completely online. Funding the journal comes partially from the organization and from revenue generated by subscription and advertisement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信