CAR-T治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤的swot共识:患者旅程和选择的微调。

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Monia Marchetti, Paolo Corradini, Luca Arcaini, Stefania Bramanti, Alice Di Rocco, Marco Ladetto, Stefano Luminari, Luigi Rigacci, Pier Luigi Zinzani
{"title":"CAR-T治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤的swot共识:患者旅程和选择的微调。","authors":"Monia Marchetti,&nbsp;Paolo Corradini,&nbsp;Luca Arcaini,&nbsp;Stefania Bramanti,&nbsp;Alice Di Rocco,&nbsp;Marco Ladetto,&nbsp;Stefano Luminari,&nbsp;Luigi Rigacci,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Zinzani","doi":"10.1002/hon.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past 2 decades, advancements in follicular lymphoma (FL) treatment, particularly with anti-CD20 antibodies, have significantly improved patient survival. However, a subset of FL patients experiences early relapse and progression within 24 months (POD24) after first line treatment, which is a sign of poor prognosis. Current guidelines recommend various second-line treatments, but there is no consensus on an optimal treatment sequence for relapsed/refractory (r/r) FL. Moreover, despite available treatments, reduced survival after second-line therapies and diminishing responses with each relapse highlight the unmet need for more effective options. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for r/r FL beyond 2<sup>nd</sup> line therapy, with three FDA/EMA-approved therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel) showing high efficacy and manageable side effects. However, challenges remain in determining which patients will benefit most from CAR-T, especially given its high cost, safety concerns, and logistical barriers. A consensus study was conducted to guide CAR-T patient selection and treatment sequencing for patients in 3rd line or beyond. Key findings suggest that younger patients, those with high disease burden or poor first-line responses, should be prioritized for CAR-T. Additionally, CAR-T is recommended as a third-line option for patients with POD24, double refractoriness (failure to respond to two subsequent lines of immunochemotherapy), or early autologous stem cell transplant failure. The study underscores the importance of early assessment of treatment response, careful second-line therapy selection, and patient adherence to ensure optimal outcomes. The results, based on expert consensus, support CAR-T therapy as a viable option for r/r FL patients, offering hope for durable remissions in this challenging cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A SWOT-Consensus for CAR-T in Follicular Lymphoma: Fine Tuning of Patient Journey and Selection\",\"authors\":\"Monia Marchetti,&nbsp;Paolo Corradini,&nbsp;Luca Arcaini,&nbsp;Stefania Bramanti,&nbsp;Alice Di Rocco,&nbsp;Marco Ladetto,&nbsp;Stefano Luminari,&nbsp;Luigi Rigacci,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Zinzani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hon.70125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past 2 decades, advancements in follicular lymphoma (FL) treatment, particularly with anti-CD20 antibodies, have significantly improved patient survival. However, a subset of FL patients experiences early relapse and progression within 24 months (POD24) after first line treatment, which is a sign of poor prognosis. Current guidelines recommend various second-line treatments, but there is no consensus on an optimal treatment sequence for relapsed/refractory (r/r) FL. Moreover, despite available treatments, reduced survival after second-line therapies and diminishing responses with each relapse highlight the unmet need for more effective options. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for r/r FL beyond 2<sup>nd</sup> line therapy, with three FDA/EMA-approved therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel) showing high efficacy and manageable side effects. However, challenges remain in determining which patients will benefit most from CAR-T, especially given its high cost, safety concerns, and logistical barriers. A consensus study was conducted to guide CAR-T patient selection and treatment sequencing for patients in 3rd line or beyond. Key findings suggest that younger patients, those with high disease burden or poor first-line responses, should be prioritized for CAR-T. Additionally, CAR-T is recommended as a third-line option for patients with POD24, double refractoriness (failure to respond to two subsequent lines of immunochemotherapy), or early autologous stem cell transplant failure. The study underscores the importance of early assessment of treatment response, careful second-line therapy selection, and patient adherence to ensure optimal outcomes. The results, based on expert consensus, support CAR-T therapy as a viable option for r/r FL patients, offering hope for durable remissions in this challenging cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的20年里,滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)治疗的进步,特别是抗cd20抗体的应用,显著提高了患者的生存率。然而,一部分FL患者在一线治疗后24个月内早期复发和进展(POD24),这是预后不良的标志。目前的指南推荐各种二线治疗,但对于复发/难治性(r/r) FL的最佳治疗顺序尚未达成共识。此外,尽管有现有的治疗方法,二线治疗后的生存率降低以及每次复发的反应减弱,这突出了对更有效选择的需求未得到满足。嵌合抗原受体t细胞(CAR-T)疗法已成为治疗r/r FL的一种有希望的二线治疗方法,FDA/ ema批准的三种治疗方法(axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel和lisocabtagene maraleucel)显示出高疗效和可控的副作用。然而,在确定哪些患者将从CAR-T中获益最大方面仍然存在挑战,特别是考虑到其高成本、安全性问题和物流障碍。进行了一项共识研究,以指导三线及以上患者的CAR-T患者选择和治疗顺序。关键研究结果表明,年轻患者、疾病负担高或一线反应差的患者应优先接受CAR-T治疗。此外,CAR-T被推荐作为POD24、双重难治性(对随后的两种免疫化疗无效)或早期自体干细胞移植失败患者的三线选择。该研究强调了早期评估治疗反应、谨慎的二线治疗选择和患者依从性以确保最佳结果的重要性。基于专家共识的结果支持CAR-T治疗作为r/r FL患者的可行选择,为这一具有挑战性的队列提供了持久缓解的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A SWOT-Consensus for CAR-T in Follicular Lymphoma: Fine Tuning of Patient Journey and Selection

A SWOT-Consensus for CAR-T in Follicular Lymphoma: Fine Tuning of Patient Journey and Selection

Over the past 2 decades, advancements in follicular lymphoma (FL) treatment, particularly with anti-CD20 antibodies, have significantly improved patient survival. However, a subset of FL patients experiences early relapse and progression within 24 months (POD24) after first line treatment, which is a sign of poor prognosis. Current guidelines recommend various second-line treatments, but there is no consensus on an optimal treatment sequence for relapsed/refractory (r/r) FL. Moreover, despite available treatments, reduced survival after second-line therapies and diminishing responses with each relapse highlight the unmet need for more effective options. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for r/r FL beyond 2nd line therapy, with three FDA/EMA-approved therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel) showing high efficacy and manageable side effects. However, challenges remain in determining which patients will benefit most from CAR-T, especially given its high cost, safety concerns, and logistical barriers. A consensus study was conducted to guide CAR-T patient selection and treatment sequencing for patients in 3rd line or beyond. Key findings suggest that younger patients, those with high disease burden or poor first-line responses, should be prioritized for CAR-T. Additionally, CAR-T is recommended as a third-line option for patients with POD24, double refractoriness (failure to respond to two subsequent lines of immunochemotherapy), or early autologous stem cell transplant failure. The study underscores the importance of early assessment of treatment response, careful second-line therapy selection, and patient adherence to ensure optimal outcomes. The results, based on expert consensus, support CAR-T therapy as a viable option for r/r FL patients, offering hope for durable remissions in this challenging cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematological Oncology
Hematological Oncology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged: -Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders -Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays -Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases -Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies -Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems. Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信