实施世卫组织紧急护理系统工具包:关于促进因素和障碍的定性研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kalkidan Tilahun Yegele, Alegnta Gebreyesus, Aman Safewo, Gelila Mengistu, Shama Patel, Menbeu Sultan, Tsion Firew
{"title":"实施世卫组织紧急护理系统工具包:关于促进因素和障碍的定性研究。","authors":"Kalkidan Tilahun Yegele, Alegnta Gebreyesus, Aman Safewo, Gelila Mengistu, Shama Patel, Menbeu Sultan, Tsion Firew","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The emergency medical disease burden in low-income countries such as Ethiopia is four times that of high-income countries. It is estimated that more than half of all deaths occurring in low-and-middle-income countries each year could be prevented by organised Emergency Care System but the emergency care in these countries is fragmented and unstructured. The WHO's Emergency Care Systems (WHO-ECS) toolkit aims to systematise and structure emergency care in such countries.<b>Objectives</b>To identify and analyse key facilitators and barriers encountered during the implementation of the (WHO-ECS) toolkit in primary hospitals in Ethiopia, within the context of a national emergency care strengthening initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative research arm of a larger implementation study conducted within 10 primary hospitals in the Oromia region, Ethiopia for 14 months. Qualitative data were collected using focus group discussions with healthcare workers in target hospitals (Amaya, Arsi Kersa, Tulu Bolo and Robe Dida Hospitals) selected via lottery method and key-informant questionnaires among project coordinators from May 2021 to February 2022. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation process were identified using thematic data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40 participants in four focus group discussions and four respondents to the key informant questionnaires. Facilitators of the toolkit included a supportive model of implementation, enthusiastic staff and the toolkit itself. Lack of medications and equipment, some components in the toolkit itself and lack of permanent staff in emergency departments were found to be barriers. Support from hospital administrators was a facilitator while lack thereof was a hurdle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has outlined the significant factors related to implementing the WHO-ECS toolkit in a low-income setting. Support from project implementers and hospital administrators as well as key stakeholder involvement facilitates success. Conversely, lack of support and resources as well as toolkits misaligned with context can hamper it. Comparable healthcare setups can use these lessons before and during implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the WHO's Emergency Care Systems toolkit: a qualitative study for facilitators and barriers.\",\"authors\":\"Kalkidan Tilahun Yegele, Alegnta Gebreyesus, Aman Safewo, Gelila Mengistu, Shama Patel, Menbeu Sultan, Tsion Firew\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2023-213652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The emergency medical disease burden in low-income countries such as Ethiopia is four times that of high-income countries. It is estimated that more than half of all deaths occurring in low-and-middle-income countries each year could be prevented by organised Emergency Care System but the emergency care in these countries is fragmented and unstructured. The WHO's Emergency Care Systems (WHO-ECS) toolkit aims to systematise and structure emergency care in such countries.<b>Objectives</b>To identify and analyse key facilitators and barriers encountered during the implementation of the (WHO-ECS) toolkit in primary hospitals in Ethiopia, within the context of a national emergency care strengthening initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative research arm of a larger implementation study conducted within 10 primary hospitals in the Oromia region, Ethiopia for 14 months. Qualitative data were collected using focus group discussions with healthcare workers in target hospitals (Amaya, Arsi Kersa, Tulu Bolo and Robe Dida Hospitals) selected via lottery method and key-informant questionnaires among project coordinators from May 2021 to February 2022. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation process were identified using thematic data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40 participants in four focus group discussions and four respondents to the key informant questionnaires. Facilitators of the toolkit included a supportive model of implementation, enthusiastic staff and the toolkit itself. Lack of medications and equipment, some components in the toolkit itself and lack of permanent staff in emergency departments were found to be barriers. Support from hospital administrators was a facilitator while lack thereof was a hurdle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has outlined the significant factors related to implementing the WHO-ECS toolkit in a low-income setting. Support from project implementers and hospital administrators as well as key stakeholder involvement facilitates success. Conversely, lack of support and resources as well as toolkits misaligned with context can hamper it. Comparable healthcare setups can use these lessons before and during implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213652\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:埃塞俄比亚等低收入国家的紧急医疗疾病负担是高收入国家的四倍。据估计,每年在低收入和中等收入国家发生的所有死亡中,有组织的紧急护理系统可以预防一半以上的死亡,但这些国家的紧急护理是分散和非结构化的。世卫组织的紧急护理系统(WHO- ecs)工具包旨在使这些国家的紧急护理系统化和结构化。在国家紧急护理加强倡议的背景下,确定和分析在埃塞俄比亚初级医院实施(世卫组织- ecs)工具包过程中遇到的主要促进因素和障碍。方法:这是在埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区10家初级医院进行的为期14个月的大型实施研究的定性研究部分。从2021年5月至2022年2月,通过抽签法和项目协调员关键信息问卷,对目标医院(Amaya、Arsi Kersa、Tulu Bolo和Robe Dida医院)的医护人员进行焦点小组讨论,收集定性数据。利用专题数据分析确定了实施进程的促进因素和障碍。结果:40人参加了4次焦点小组讨论,4人参与了关键信息问卷调查。工具包的推动者包括一个支持性的实施模型、热情的工作人员和工具包本身。缺乏药品和设备、工具包本身的一些组成部分以及急诊科缺乏长期工作人员被认为是障碍。医院管理人员的支持是一个促进因素,而缺乏支持则是一个障碍。结论:本研究概述了与在低收入环境中实施世卫组织ecs工具包相关的重要因素。项目执行者和医院管理者的支持以及关键利益相关者的参与促进了成功。相反,缺乏支持和资源以及与上下文不一致的工具包可能会阻碍它。类似的医疗机构可以在实施之前和实施过程中使用这些经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing the WHO's Emergency Care Systems toolkit: a qualitative study for facilitators and barriers.

Introduction: The emergency medical disease burden in low-income countries such as Ethiopia is four times that of high-income countries. It is estimated that more than half of all deaths occurring in low-and-middle-income countries each year could be prevented by organised Emergency Care System but the emergency care in these countries is fragmented and unstructured. The WHO's Emergency Care Systems (WHO-ECS) toolkit aims to systematise and structure emergency care in such countries.ObjectivesTo identify and analyse key facilitators and barriers encountered during the implementation of the (WHO-ECS) toolkit in primary hospitals in Ethiopia, within the context of a national emergency care strengthening initiative.

Methods: This was a qualitative research arm of a larger implementation study conducted within 10 primary hospitals in the Oromia region, Ethiopia for 14 months. Qualitative data were collected using focus group discussions with healthcare workers in target hospitals (Amaya, Arsi Kersa, Tulu Bolo and Robe Dida Hospitals) selected via lottery method and key-informant questionnaires among project coordinators from May 2021 to February 2022. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation process were identified using thematic data analysis.

Results: There were 40 participants in four focus group discussions and four respondents to the key informant questionnaires. Facilitators of the toolkit included a supportive model of implementation, enthusiastic staff and the toolkit itself. Lack of medications and equipment, some components in the toolkit itself and lack of permanent staff in emergency departments were found to be barriers. Support from hospital administrators was a facilitator while lack thereof was a hurdle.

Conclusion: This study has outlined the significant factors related to implementing the WHO-ECS toolkit in a low-income setting. Support from project implementers and hospital administrators as well as key stakeholder involvement facilitates success. Conversely, lack of support and resources as well as toolkits misaligned with context can hamper it. Comparable healthcare setups can use these lessons before and during implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信