Ina Geerts, Kaat Beunen, Mart Peeters, Nancy Van Wilder, Dominique Ballaux, Gerd Vanhaverbeke, Youri Taes, Xavier-Philippe Aers, Frank Nobels, Liesbeth Van Huffel, Joke Marlier, Dahae Lee, Joke Cuypers, Vanessa Preumont, Sarah E Siegelaar, Rebecca C Painter, Annouschka Laenen, Pieter Gillard, Chantal Mathieu, Katrien Benhalima
{"title":"在不同亚组中,谁从妊娠晚期混合闭环治疗中获益最多:随机对照crial试验的二次分析。","authors":"Ina Geerts, Kaat Beunen, Mart Peeters, Nancy Van Wilder, Dominique Ballaux, Gerd Vanhaverbeke, Youri Taes, Xavier-Philippe Aers, Frank Nobels, Liesbeth Van Huffel, Joke Marlier, Dahae Lee, Joke Cuypers, Vanessa Preumont, Sarah E Siegelaar, Rebecca C Painter, Annouschka Laenen, Pieter Gillard, Chantal Mathieu, Katrien Benhalima","doi":"10.1177/15209156251379505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The CRISTAL trial indicated that advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) therapy with MiniMed™ 780G in type 1 diabetes pregnancy did not improve time in range (TIRp) compared with standard insulin therapy (SoC), but improved TIRp overnight and reduced time below range (TBRp). We aimed to evaluate the effect of AHCL therapy across different subgroups. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> This secondary analysis of the CRISTAL randomized controlled trial compared glycemic outcomes (TIRp, TIRp overnight, TBRp, and TBRp overnight) averaged over the antenatal period (14-, 20-, 26-, and 33-weeks' gestation) between the AHCL and SoC groups, within subgroups defined by baseline characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In women with baseline HbA1c <7.0%, the AHCL group (<i>n</i> = 35) had a significantly higher TIRp than SoC (<i>n</i> = 37), with a mean difference of 5.64% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.32-9.96), corresponding to 1 h 21 min more TIRp per day and 11.89% (95% CI: 7.01-16.76) higher TIRp overnight. In women without prior AHCL use, TIRp was 6.29% higher (95% CI: 0.90-11.68) and overnight TIRp 11.91% higher (95% CI: 5.65-18.16) in the AHCL group (<i>n</i> = 24) compared with SoC (<i>n</i> = 28). In women without higher education, AHCL users (<i>n</i> = 14) had a significantly higher TIRp compared with SoC (<i>n</i> = 14) with a difference of 7.33% (95% CI: 0.88-13.78). TBRp was significantly lower in AHCL users with baseline HbA1c <7.0% and in women without prior AHCL use. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> AHCL therapy improved glycemic management in pregnant women with baseline HbA1c <7.0%, in women without prior AHCL use, and in women without higher education, indicating that AHCL might particularly benefit these subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Benefits Most from Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy in Pregnancy Across Different Subgroups: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Controlled CRISTAL Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ina Geerts, Kaat Beunen, Mart Peeters, Nancy Van Wilder, Dominique Ballaux, Gerd Vanhaverbeke, Youri Taes, Xavier-Philippe Aers, Frank Nobels, Liesbeth Van Huffel, Joke Marlier, Dahae Lee, Joke Cuypers, Vanessa Preumont, Sarah E Siegelaar, Rebecca C Painter, Annouschka Laenen, Pieter Gillard, Chantal Mathieu, Katrien Benhalima\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15209156251379505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The CRISTAL trial indicated that advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) therapy with MiniMed™ 780G in type 1 diabetes pregnancy did not improve time in range (TIRp) compared with standard insulin therapy (SoC), but improved TIRp overnight and reduced time below range (TBRp). We aimed to evaluate the effect of AHCL therapy across different subgroups. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> This secondary analysis of the CRISTAL randomized controlled trial compared glycemic outcomes (TIRp, TIRp overnight, TBRp, and TBRp overnight) averaged over the antenatal period (14-, 20-, 26-, and 33-weeks' gestation) between the AHCL and SoC groups, within subgroups defined by baseline characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In women with baseline HbA1c <7.0%, the AHCL group (<i>n</i> = 35) had a significantly higher TIRp than SoC (<i>n</i> = 37), with a mean difference of 5.64% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.32-9.96), corresponding to 1 h 21 min more TIRp per day and 11.89% (95% CI: 7.01-16.76) higher TIRp overnight. In women without prior AHCL use, TIRp was 6.29% higher (95% CI: 0.90-11.68) and overnight TIRp 11.91% higher (95% CI: 5.65-18.16) in the AHCL group (<i>n</i> = 24) compared with SoC (<i>n</i> = 28). In women without higher education, AHCL users (<i>n</i> = 14) had a significantly higher TIRp compared with SoC (<i>n</i> = 14) with a difference of 7.33% (95% CI: 0.88-13.78). TBRp was significantly lower in AHCL users with baseline HbA1c <7.0% and in women without prior AHCL use. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> AHCL therapy improved glycemic management in pregnant women with baseline HbA1c <7.0%, in women without prior AHCL use, and in women without higher education, indicating that AHCL might particularly benefit these subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251379505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251379505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Who Benefits Most from Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy in Pregnancy Across Different Subgroups: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Controlled CRISTAL Trial.
Objective: The CRISTAL trial indicated that advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) therapy with MiniMed™ 780G in type 1 diabetes pregnancy did not improve time in range (TIRp) compared with standard insulin therapy (SoC), but improved TIRp overnight and reduced time below range (TBRp). We aimed to evaluate the effect of AHCL therapy across different subgroups. Research Design and Methods: This secondary analysis of the CRISTAL randomized controlled trial compared glycemic outcomes (TIRp, TIRp overnight, TBRp, and TBRp overnight) averaged over the antenatal period (14-, 20-, 26-, and 33-weeks' gestation) between the AHCL and SoC groups, within subgroups defined by baseline characteristics. Results: In women with baseline HbA1c <7.0%, the AHCL group (n = 35) had a significantly higher TIRp than SoC (n = 37), with a mean difference of 5.64% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.32-9.96), corresponding to 1 h 21 min more TIRp per day and 11.89% (95% CI: 7.01-16.76) higher TIRp overnight. In women without prior AHCL use, TIRp was 6.29% higher (95% CI: 0.90-11.68) and overnight TIRp 11.91% higher (95% CI: 5.65-18.16) in the AHCL group (n = 24) compared with SoC (n = 28). In women without higher education, AHCL users (n = 14) had a significantly higher TIRp compared with SoC (n = 14) with a difference of 7.33% (95% CI: 0.88-13.78). TBRp was significantly lower in AHCL users with baseline HbA1c <7.0% and in women without prior AHCL use. Conclusions: AHCL therapy improved glycemic management in pregnant women with baseline HbA1c <7.0%, in women without prior AHCL use, and in women without higher education, indicating that AHCL might particularly benefit these subgroups.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.