在缺血性卒中二级预防中优先使用降压药:一项基于人群的回顾性研究

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hsin-Yu Chen, Wei-Kai Lee, Yao-Min Hung, Der-Yang Cho, Renin Chang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Jin-Shuen Chen
{"title":"在缺血性卒中二级预防中优先使用降压药:一项基于人群的回顾性研究","authors":"Hsin-Yu Chen, Wei-Kai Lee, Yao-Min Hung, Der-Yang Cho, Renin Chang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Jin-Shuen Chen","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01229-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) is associated with higher rates of mortality and comorbidities as well as an increased economic burden than the first attack, the choice of first-line antihypertensive agent for secondary prevention remains controversial. This study examined the efficacy of various antihypertensive agents for the secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in a real-world context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Health Insurance Research Database, patients with first acute IS from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2020 were enrolled. Using propensity score-based probability of treatment weighting, all participants were divided into other antihypertensive drugs (OHTND), angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors/angiotensin II-receptor-blockers (ACEI/ARB), and calcium-channel-blockers (CCB) cohorts. Primary outcome was difference in risk of recurrent IS, and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke-related death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the OHTND cohort, individuals in the ACEI/ARB and CCB cohorts had a 14% (p < 0.001) and 15% (p < 0.001) lower risk of recurrent IS, respectively. Individuals in the CCB cohort had a 37% (p = 0.006) higher risk of acute myocardial infarction compared with the OHTND cohort. Compared with ACEI users, ARB users experienced a 22% lower risk of recurrent IS, while ARB users had a 46% lower risk of stroke-related death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of ACEI/ARB following acute IS was associated with a lower risk of recurrent IS. Our results not only corresponded to pre-existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but also addressed the knowledge gap regarding the choice of first-line antihypertensive agents following acute IS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing Antihypertensive Agents in Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hsin-Yu Chen, Wei-Kai Lee, Yao-Min Hung, Der-Yang Cho, Renin Chang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Jin-Shuen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40263-025-01229-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) is associated with higher rates of mortality and comorbidities as well as an increased economic burden than the first attack, the choice of first-line antihypertensive agent for secondary prevention remains controversial. This study examined the efficacy of various antihypertensive agents for the secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in a real-world context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Health Insurance Research Database, patients with first acute IS from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2020 were enrolled. Using propensity score-based probability of treatment weighting, all participants were divided into other antihypertensive drugs (OHTND), angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors/angiotensin II-receptor-blockers (ACEI/ARB), and calcium-channel-blockers (CCB) cohorts. Primary outcome was difference in risk of recurrent IS, and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke-related death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the OHTND cohort, individuals in the ACEI/ARB and CCB cohorts had a 14% (p < 0.001) and 15% (p < 0.001) lower risk of recurrent IS, respectively. Individuals in the CCB cohort had a 37% (p = 0.006) higher risk of acute myocardial infarction compared with the OHTND cohort. Compared with ACEI users, ARB users experienced a 22% lower risk of recurrent IS, while ARB users had a 46% lower risk of stroke-related death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of ACEI/ARB following acute IS was associated with a lower risk of recurrent IS. Our results not only corresponded to pre-existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but also addressed the knowledge gap regarding the choice of first-line antihypertensive agents following acute IS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-025-01229-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-025-01229-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管与首次发作相比,复发性缺血性卒中(IS)与更高的死亡率和合并症以及增加的经济负担相关,但一线降压药的选择用于二级预防仍然存在争议。本研究考察了在现实世界中各种降压药对复发性缺血性脑卒中二级预防的疗效。方法:使用国家健康保险研究数据库,纳入2000年1月1日至2020年12月31日首次急性IS患者。使用基于倾向评分的治疗加权概率,所有参与者被分为其他抗高血压药物(OHTND)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素ii受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARB)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)队列。主要结局是IS复发风险的差异,次要结局是全因死亡率、卒中相关死亡和主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCEs)。采用Cox比例风险模型估计调整后的风险比和95%置信区间。结果:与OHTND队列相比,ACEI/ARB和CCB队列的个体复发IS的风险分别降低了14% (p < 0.001)和15% (p < 0.001)。CCB组的个体发生急性心肌梗死的风险比OHTND组高37% (p = 0.006)。与ACEI使用者相比,ARB使用者复发性IS的风险降低22%,而ARB使用者卒中相关死亡风险降低46%。结论:急性IS后使用ACEI/ARB与较低的IS复发风险相关。我们的研究结果不仅与已有的随机对照试验(RCTs)相符,而且还解决了急性IS后一线抗高血压药物选择的知识缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritizing Antihypertensive Agents in Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.

Background: Although recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) is associated with higher rates of mortality and comorbidities as well as an increased economic burden than the first attack, the choice of first-line antihypertensive agent for secondary prevention remains controversial. This study examined the efficacy of various antihypertensive agents for the secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in a real-world context.

Methods: Using the National Health Insurance Research Database, patients with first acute IS from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2020 were enrolled. Using propensity score-based probability of treatment weighting, all participants were divided into other antihypertensive drugs (OHTND), angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors/angiotensin II-receptor-blockers (ACEI/ARB), and calcium-channel-blockers (CCB) cohorts. Primary outcome was difference in risk of recurrent IS, and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke-related death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Compared with the OHTND cohort, individuals in the ACEI/ARB and CCB cohorts had a 14% (p < 0.001) and 15% (p < 0.001) lower risk of recurrent IS, respectively. Individuals in the CCB cohort had a 37% (p = 0.006) higher risk of acute myocardial infarction compared with the OHTND cohort. Compared with ACEI users, ARB users experienced a 22% lower risk of recurrent IS, while ARB users had a 46% lower risk of stroke-related death.

Conclusions: The use of ACEI/ARB following acute IS was associated with a lower risk of recurrent IS. Our results not only corresponded to pre-existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but also addressed the knowledge gap regarding the choice of first-line antihypertensive agents following acute IS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS drugs
CNS drugs 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes: - Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. - Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses. - Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. - Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry. - Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信