Ruihua Zhang, Meizhizi Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Yang Liu, Jingyi Li, Hui Wang, Song Han, Xiufeng Huang, Zhonghua Shi
{"title":"机械充气/呼气咳嗽辅助预防神经外科术后肺炎的安全性和有效性:一项生理和队列联合研究","authors":"Ruihua Zhang, Meizhizi Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Yang Liu, Jingyi Li, Hui Wang, Song Han, Xiufeng Huang, Zhonghua Shi","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02386-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a common complication after neurosurgery, leading to worse outcomes. Although mechanical insufflation/exsufflation cough assistance (M-I/E-ca) may improve airway clearance, its safety and efficacy in this patient group remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate M-I/E-ca's impact on intracranial pressure (ICP) and hemodynamics and its role in preventing POP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of two substudies: a prospective physiological study to evaluate ICP and hemodynamic changes and a retrospective-prospective cohort study to assess the incidence of POP. The first substudy enrolled ten patients after neurosurgery, whereas the second included 200 patients, with 100 in the M-I/E-ca group (prospective) and 100 in the control group (retrospective).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>M-I/E-ca did not significantly alter ICP or hemodynamic parameters compared with the baseline. Instead, M-I/E-ca caused less disruption in ICP than traditional endotracheal suction, with insufflation/exsufflation pressure set at 40 mm Hg. The incidence of POP was 39%, with lower but not significant incidence in the M-I/E-ca (35%) compared with control (42%) groups (P = 0.309). In addition, patients in the M-I/E-ca group had significantly shorter intensive care unit (P = 0.006) and hospital (P = 0.002) stays compared with those in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>M-I/E-ca is safe for patients after neurosurgery, with no significant impact on ICP or hemodynamics. Although it did not significantly reduce POP, it may contribute to shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, suggesting potential benefits that warrant further investigation in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation/Exsufflation Cough Assistance for Preventing Postoperative Pneumonia in Neurosurgical Patients: A Combined Physiological and Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruihua Zhang, Meizhizi Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Yang Liu, Jingyi Li, Hui Wang, Song Han, Xiufeng Huang, Zhonghua Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02386-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a common complication after neurosurgery, leading to worse outcomes. Although mechanical insufflation/exsufflation cough assistance (M-I/E-ca) may improve airway clearance, its safety and efficacy in this patient group remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate M-I/E-ca's impact on intracranial pressure (ICP) and hemodynamics and its role in preventing POP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of two substudies: a prospective physiological study to evaluate ICP and hemodynamic changes and a retrospective-prospective cohort study to assess the incidence of POP. The first substudy enrolled ten patients after neurosurgery, whereas the second included 200 patients, with 100 in the M-I/E-ca group (prospective) and 100 in the control group (retrospective).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>M-I/E-ca did not significantly alter ICP or hemodynamic parameters compared with the baseline. Instead, M-I/E-ca caused less disruption in ICP than traditional endotracheal suction, with insufflation/exsufflation pressure set at 40 mm Hg. The incidence of POP was 39%, with lower but not significant incidence in the M-I/E-ca (35%) compared with control (42%) groups (P = 0.309). In addition, patients in the M-I/E-ca group had significantly shorter intensive care unit (P = 0.006) and hospital (P = 0.002) stays compared with those in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>M-I/E-ca is safe for patients after neurosurgery, with no significant impact on ICP or hemodynamics. Although it did not significantly reduce POP, it may contribute to shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, suggesting potential benefits that warrant further investigation in larger studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02386-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02386-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:术后肺炎(POP)是神经外科术后常见的并发症,其预后较差。虽然机械充气/呼气咳嗽辅助(M-I/E-ca)可以改善气道清除率,但其在该患者组中的安全性和有效性仍有待研究。本研究旨在评估M-I/E-ca对颅内压(ICP)和血流动力学的影响及其在预防POP中的作用。方法:本研究包括两个亚研究:评估ICP和血流动力学变化的前瞻性生理研究和评估POP发生率的回顾性-前瞻性队列研究。第一个亚研究招募了10名神经外科术后患者,而第二个亚研究包括200名患者,其中100名在M-I/E-ca组(前瞻性),100名在对照组(回顾性)。结果:与基线相比,M-I/E-ca没有显著改变ICP或血流动力学参数。相反,M-I/E-ca对ICP的破坏比传统气管内吸引更小,充气/呼气压力设定为40 mm Hg。POP发生率为39%,M-I/E-ca组发生率为35%,低于对照组(42%)(P = 0.309)。此外,与对照组相比,M-I/E-ca组患者的重症监护病房(P = 0.006)和住院时间(P = 0.002)均显著缩短。结论:M-I/E-ca对神经外科术后患者是安全的,对颅内压和血流动力学无明显影响。虽然它没有显著减少POP,但它可能有助于缩短重症监护病房和住院时间,这表明潜在的益处值得在更大规模的研究中进一步调查。
Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation/Exsufflation Cough Assistance for Preventing Postoperative Pneumonia in Neurosurgical Patients: A Combined Physiological and Cohort Study.
Background: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a common complication after neurosurgery, leading to worse outcomes. Although mechanical insufflation/exsufflation cough assistance (M-I/E-ca) may improve airway clearance, its safety and efficacy in this patient group remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate M-I/E-ca's impact on intracranial pressure (ICP) and hemodynamics and its role in preventing POP.
Methods: This study consisted of two substudies: a prospective physiological study to evaluate ICP and hemodynamic changes and a retrospective-prospective cohort study to assess the incidence of POP. The first substudy enrolled ten patients after neurosurgery, whereas the second included 200 patients, with 100 in the M-I/E-ca group (prospective) and 100 in the control group (retrospective).
Results: M-I/E-ca did not significantly alter ICP or hemodynamic parameters compared with the baseline. Instead, M-I/E-ca caused less disruption in ICP than traditional endotracheal suction, with insufflation/exsufflation pressure set at 40 mm Hg. The incidence of POP was 39%, with lower but not significant incidence in the M-I/E-ca (35%) compared with control (42%) groups (P = 0.309). In addition, patients in the M-I/E-ca group had significantly shorter intensive care unit (P = 0.006) and hospital (P = 0.002) stays compared with those in the control group.
Conclusions: M-I/E-ca is safe for patients after neurosurgery, with no significant impact on ICP or hemodynamics. Although it did not significantly reduce POP, it may contribute to shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, suggesting potential benefits that warrant further investigation in larger studies.
期刊介绍:
Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.