一个新的逻辑回归模型检测慢性腰痛,基于病例对照研究在西班牙人口。

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Pilar Alberola-Zorrilla, Ana Queralt, Maria Ángeles Pamblanco-Valero, Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
{"title":"一个新的逻辑回归模型检测慢性腰痛,基于病例对照研究在西班牙人口。","authors":"Pilar Alberola-Zorrilla, Ana Queralt, Maria Ángeles Pamblanco-Valero, Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study comparing healthy individuals and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare detailed spinal motion and muscle activity patterns-recorded simultaneously using non-invasive methods-between chronic NSLBP patients and pain-free individuals, and to identify the most clinically useful variables for discriminating between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Motion analysis and electromyography (EMG) have been widely used to differentiate NSLBP patients from pain-free individuals. However, due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, the results have been inconsistent, limiting the clinical applicability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three pain-free controls and 43 patients with chronic NSLBP were enrolled. Using non-invasive techniques, synchronized lumbar spine motion and erector spinae (ES) EMG activity were recorded during standardized trunk flexion-extension cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several variables differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression identified two variables with significant odds ratios for the presence of chronic NSLBP: time spent with the spine flexed beyond 90% of its maximum range (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99) and the ES relaxation ratio (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with and without chronic NSLBP exhibit distinct spinal motion and ES activity patterns during trunk flexionextension. These differences-specifically the time of maximum lumbar flexion and the relaxation ratio-can be objectively and easily measured. Their assessment may offer valuable clinical utility for the diagnosis and follow-up of NSLBP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new logistic regression model for the detection of chronic low back pain, based on a case-control study in the Spanish population.\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Alberola-Zorrilla, Ana Queralt, Maria Ángeles Pamblanco-Valero, Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2025.0336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study comparing healthy individuals and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare detailed spinal motion and muscle activity patterns-recorded simultaneously using non-invasive methods-between chronic NSLBP patients and pain-free individuals, and to identify the most clinically useful variables for discriminating between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Motion analysis and electromyography (EMG) have been widely used to differentiate NSLBP patients from pain-free individuals. However, due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, the results have been inconsistent, limiting the clinical applicability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three pain-free controls and 43 patients with chronic NSLBP were enrolled. Using non-invasive techniques, synchronized lumbar spine motion and erector spinae (ES) EMG activity were recorded during standardized trunk flexion-extension cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several variables differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression identified two variables with significant odds ratios for the presence of chronic NSLBP: time spent with the spine flexed beyond 90% of its maximum range (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99) and the ES relaxation ratio (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with and without chronic NSLBP exhibit distinct spinal motion and ES activity patterns during trunk flexionextension. These differences-specifically the time of maximum lumbar flexion and the relaxation ratio-can be objectively and easily measured. Their assessment may offer valuable clinical utility for the diagnosis and follow-up of NSLBP patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:病例对照研究,比较健康个体和慢性非特异性腰痛(NSLBP)患者。目的:比较慢性非slbp患者和无痛个体之间详细的脊柱运动和肌肉活动模式(同时使用非侵入性方法记录),并确定区分两组的最有临床意义的变量。文献综述:运动分析和肌电图(EMG)已被广泛用于区分非slbp患者和无痛个体。然而,由于研究方法的异质性,结果不一致,限制了研究结果的临床适用性。方法:纳入43例无痛对照和43例慢性非slbp患者。采用非侵入性技术,在标准化躯干屈伸周期中记录同步腰椎运动和竖脊肌肌电图活动。结果:两组间多项指标差异显著。Logistic回归确定了慢性非slbp存在的两个具有显著优势比的变量:脊柱屈曲超过其最大范围90%的时间(优势比为0.92,95%可信区间为0.86-0.99)和ES松弛比(优势比为1.08,95%可信区间为1.04-1.13)。结论:患有和不患有慢性NSLBP的个体在躯干屈伸时表现出不同的脊柱运动和ES活动模式。这些差异——特别是最大腰椎屈曲的时间和松弛率——可以客观而容易地测量。他们的评估可能为非slbp患者的诊断和随访提供有价值的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new logistic regression model for the detection of chronic low back pain, based on a case-control study in the Spanish population.

Study design: Case-control study comparing healthy individuals and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).

Purpose: To compare detailed spinal motion and muscle activity patterns-recorded simultaneously using non-invasive methods-between chronic NSLBP patients and pain-free individuals, and to identify the most clinically useful variables for discriminating between the two groups.

Overview of literature: Motion analysis and electromyography (EMG) have been widely used to differentiate NSLBP patients from pain-free individuals. However, due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, the results have been inconsistent, limiting the clinical applicability of the findings.

Methods: Forty-three pain-free controls and 43 patients with chronic NSLBP were enrolled. Using non-invasive techniques, synchronized lumbar spine motion and erector spinae (ES) EMG activity were recorded during standardized trunk flexion-extension cycles.

Results: Several variables differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression identified two variables with significant odds ratios for the presence of chronic NSLBP: time spent with the spine flexed beyond 90% of its maximum range (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99) and the ES relaxation ratio (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13).

Conclusions: Individuals with and without chronic NSLBP exhibit distinct spinal motion and ES activity patterns during trunk flexionextension. These differences-specifically the time of maximum lumbar flexion and the relaxation ratio-can be objectively and easily measured. Their assessment may offer valuable clinical utility for the diagnosis and follow-up of NSLBP patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信