平衡护理需求——院前急救护士为年老体弱病人提供自我护理建议和家庭转诊经验的定性研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Gabriella Norberg Boysen, Elin Svensson, Caroline Heldtander, Johan Herlitz, Agnes Olander
{"title":"平衡护理需求——院前急救护士为年老体弱病人提供自我护理建议和家庭转诊经验的定性研究。","authors":"Gabriella Norberg Boysen, Elin Svensson, Caroline Heldtander, Johan Herlitz, Agnes Olander","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01355-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aging population has led to a growing number of frail older patients in prehospital emergency care. These patients often present with complex healthcare needs, posing significant challenges for prehospital emergency nurses (PENs) when assessing the appropriateness of providing self-care advice and recommending that patients remain at home. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the experiences of PENs in giving self-care advice and referring frail older patients to remain at home when this approach is considered the most appropriate course of action.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory qualitative design was employed, which was based on individual semistructured interviews with ten PENs from an ambulance service organization in southwestern Sweden. The data were analysed via inductive qualitative content analysis, following the approach described by Elo and Kyngäs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in one main category: Professional discretion and coordinated support for sustainable decision making, along with three generic categories. The findings highlight key dilemmas faced by PENs: navigating uncertainty in frail older patients' cognitive and functional abilities, balancing patient autonomy and self-determination with safety concerns, and managing the ethical tension between respecting dignity and preventing harm. PENs also highlighted dilemmas in communication, where striving for clarity and trust was hampered by language barriers. They further experienced challenges in negotiating power and responsibility with frail older patients and relatives. Limited resources, unclear care structures, and insufficient collaboration with other healthcare providers created additional organizational dilemmas, constraining PENs' ability to make confident, ethically sustainable decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the complexity of decision-making for PENs when giving self-care advice and referring frail older patients to remain at home. Ensuring safe and sustainable care requires thorough assessments, clear communication, clinical expertise, empathy, and interprofessional collaboration, while future research should also address patients' perspectives and the organizational factors influencing PENs' decisions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing care needs - a qualitative study on prehospital emergency nurses' experiences of providing self-care advice and home referrals for frail older patients.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriella Norberg Boysen, Elin Svensson, Caroline Heldtander, Johan Herlitz, Agnes Olander\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01355-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aging population has led to a growing number of frail older patients in prehospital emergency care. These patients often present with complex healthcare needs, posing significant challenges for prehospital emergency nurses (PENs) when assessing the appropriateness of providing self-care advice and recommending that patients remain at home. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the experiences of PENs in giving self-care advice and referring frail older patients to remain at home when this approach is considered the most appropriate course of action.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory qualitative design was employed, which was based on individual semistructured interviews with ten PENs from an ambulance service organization in southwestern Sweden. The data were analysed via inductive qualitative content analysis, following the approach described by Elo and Kyngäs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in one main category: Professional discretion and coordinated support for sustainable decision making, along with three generic categories. The findings highlight key dilemmas faced by PENs: navigating uncertainty in frail older patients' cognitive and functional abilities, balancing patient autonomy and self-determination with safety concerns, and managing the ethical tension between respecting dignity and preventing harm. PENs also highlighted dilemmas in communication, where striving for clarity and trust was hampered by language barriers. They further experienced challenges in negotiating power and responsibility with frail older patients and relatives. Limited resources, unclear care structures, and insufficient collaboration with other healthcare providers created additional organizational dilemmas, constraining PENs' ability to make confident, ethically sustainable decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the complexity of decision-making for PENs when giving self-care advice and referring frail older patients to remain at home. Ensuring safe and sustainable care requires thorough assessments, clear communication, clinical expertise, empathy, and interprofessional collaboration, while future research should also address patients' perspectives and the organizational factors influencing PENs' decisions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01355-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01355-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人口老龄化导致越来越多的体弱老年患者院前急救。这些患者通常具有复杂的医疗保健需求,在评估提供自我护理建议和建议患者留在家中的适当性时,对院前急诊护士(PENs)提出了重大挑战。因此,本研究旨在探讨pen在提供自我护理建议和推荐体弱多病的老年患者留在家中时的经验,当这种方法被认为是最合适的行动方案时。方法:采用探索性定性设计,基于对瑞典西南部救护车服务组织的10名pen的个人半结构化访谈。根据Elo和Kyngäs描述的方法,通过归纳定性内容分析对数据进行分析。结果:分析得出一个主要类别:专业自由裁量权和可持续决策的协调支持,以及三个一般类别。研究结果突出了pen面临的关键困境:应对体弱多病的老年患者认知和功能能力的不确定性,平衡患者的自主权和自决与安全问题,以及管理尊重尊严和防止伤害之间的伦理紧张关系。pen还强调了沟通中的困境,语言障碍阻碍了对清晰和信任的努力。他们还在与体弱多病的老年病人和亲属的谈判能力和责任方面遇到了挑战。有限的资源、不明确的护理结构以及与其他医疗保健提供者的合作不足造成了额外的组织困境,限制了pen做出自信、道德上可持续的决策的能力。结论:本研究强调了pen在提供自我护理建议和推荐虚弱的老年患者留在家中时决策的复杂性。确保安全和可持续的护理需要彻底的评估、清晰的沟通、临床专业知识、同理心和跨专业合作,而未来的研究还应考虑患者的观点和影响pen决策的组织因素。临床试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing care needs - a qualitative study on prehospital emergency nurses' experiences of providing self-care advice and home referrals for frail older patients.

Background: The aging population has led to a growing number of frail older patients in prehospital emergency care. These patients often present with complex healthcare needs, posing significant challenges for prehospital emergency nurses (PENs) when assessing the appropriateness of providing self-care advice and recommending that patients remain at home. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the experiences of PENs in giving self-care advice and referring frail older patients to remain at home when this approach is considered the most appropriate course of action.

Methods: An exploratory qualitative design was employed, which was based on individual semistructured interviews with ten PENs from an ambulance service organization in southwestern Sweden. The data were analysed via inductive qualitative content analysis, following the approach described by Elo and Kyngäs.

Results: The analysis resulted in one main category: Professional discretion and coordinated support for sustainable decision making, along with three generic categories. The findings highlight key dilemmas faced by PENs: navigating uncertainty in frail older patients' cognitive and functional abilities, balancing patient autonomy and self-determination with safety concerns, and managing the ethical tension between respecting dignity and preventing harm. PENs also highlighted dilemmas in communication, where striving for clarity and trust was hampered by language barriers. They further experienced challenges in negotiating power and responsibility with frail older patients and relatives. Limited resources, unclear care structures, and insufficient collaboration with other healthcare providers created additional organizational dilemmas, constraining PENs' ability to make confident, ethically sustainable decisions.

Conclusion: This study underscores the complexity of decision-making for PENs when giving self-care advice and referring frail older patients to remain at home. Ensuring safe and sustainable care requires thorough assessments, clear communication, clinical expertise, empathy, and interprofessional collaboration, while future research should also address patients' perspectives and the organizational factors influencing PENs' decisions.

Clinical trial registration: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信