用脊柱感染治疗评估评分预测胸腰椎硬膜外脓肿术后残留神经功能缺损:台湾回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jian-Jiun Chen, Hsi-Hsien Lin, Po-Hsin Chou, Shih-Tien Wang, Chien-Lin Liu, Yu-Cheng Yao
{"title":"用脊柱感染治疗评估评分预测胸腰椎硬膜外脓肿术后残留神经功能缺损:台湾回顾性研究。","authors":"Jian-Jiun Chen, Hsi-Hsien Lin, Po-Hsin Chou, Shih-Tien Wang, Chien-Lin Liu, Yu-Cheng Yao","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, consecutive case series.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed the predictive validity of the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation (SITE) score to determine the likelihood of residual neurological deficits (ND) following surgical treatment of spinal epidural abscess (SEA).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>SEA is a severe spinal infection that can result in irreversible ND and sepsis if left untreated. Although various risk factors have been proposed to predict postoperative neurological outcomes, the optimal predictors remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 patients diagnosed with de novo thoracic or lumbar SEA who underwent posterior-only surgical decompression between 2005 and 2014, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years, were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of postoperative residual ND, and neurological function was assessed immediately after surgery and at the final followup using the Frankel grading system. SITE scores, along with clinical and radiological data associated with residual ND, were collected. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with residual ND had significantly lower SITE scores than those without residual ND (4.3±1.3 vs. 7±1.8, p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified the SITE score as an independent predictor (odds ratio, 2.70; p=0.012). ROC analysis showed that a SITE score ≤6 predicted residual ND with 73.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with an area under the curve of 0.877 (p<0.001). Other significant predictors included cauda equina syndrome and a shorter symptom-to-surgery interval, both of which were associated with a higher risk of residual ND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SITE score is a reliable and independent predictor of residual ND after surgery for SEA. SITE scores <6 indicate a significantly higher risk of postoperative ND.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting residual neurologic deficits using the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation score after surgery for thoracic and lumbar spinal epidural abscess: a retrospective study in Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Jian-Jiun Chen, Hsi-Hsien Lin, Po-Hsin Chou, Shih-Tien Wang, Chien-Lin Liu, Yu-Cheng Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2025.0285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, consecutive case series.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed the predictive validity of the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation (SITE) score to determine the likelihood of residual neurological deficits (ND) following surgical treatment of spinal epidural abscess (SEA).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>SEA is a severe spinal infection that can result in irreversible ND and sepsis if left untreated. Although various risk factors have been proposed to predict postoperative neurological outcomes, the optimal predictors remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 patients diagnosed with de novo thoracic or lumbar SEA who underwent posterior-only surgical decompression between 2005 and 2014, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years, were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of postoperative residual ND, and neurological function was assessed immediately after surgery and at the final followup using the Frankel grading system. SITE scores, along with clinical and radiological data associated with residual ND, were collected. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with residual ND had significantly lower SITE scores than those without residual ND (4.3±1.3 vs. 7±1.8, p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified the SITE score as an independent predictor (odds ratio, 2.70; p=0.012). ROC analysis showed that a SITE score ≤6 predicted residual ND with 73.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with an area under the curve of 0.877 (p<0.001). Other significant predictors included cauda equina syndrome and a shorter symptom-to-surgery interval, both of which were associated with a higher risk of residual ND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SITE score is a reliable and independent predictor of residual ND after surgery for SEA. SITE scores <6 indicate a significantly higher risk of postoperative ND.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性、连续的病例系列。目的:我们评估脊髓感染治疗评估(SITE)评分的预测有效性,以确定脊髓硬膜外脓肿(SEA)手术治疗后残留神经功能缺损(ND)的可能性。文献综述:SEA是一种严重的脊柱感染,如果不及时治疗,可导致不可逆的ND和败血症。虽然已经提出了各种危险因素来预测术后神经预后,但最佳预测因素仍不清楚。方法:共纳入45例2005年至2014年间接受单纯后路手术减压的新发胸腰椎SEA患者,术后随访至少2年。根据是否存在术后残余ND对患者进行分层,并在术后和最后随访时使用Frankel分级系统立即评估神经功能。收集SITE评分,以及与残余ND相关的临床和放射学数据。采用Logistic回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定显著的预测因子。结果:ND残留患者的SITE评分明显低于无ND残留患者(4.3±1.3比7±1.8)。结论:SITE评分是SEA术后ND残留的可靠和独立的预测指标。网站评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting residual neurologic deficits using the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation score after surgery for thoracic and lumbar spinal epidural abscess: a retrospective study in Taiwan.

Study design: Retrospective, consecutive case series.

Purpose: We assessed the predictive validity of the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation (SITE) score to determine the likelihood of residual neurological deficits (ND) following surgical treatment of spinal epidural abscess (SEA).

Overview of literature: SEA is a severe spinal infection that can result in irreversible ND and sepsis if left untreated. Although various risk factors have been proposed to predict postoperative neurological outcomes, the optimal predictors remain unclear.

Methods: A total of 45 patients diagnosed with de novo thoracic or lumbar SEA who underwent posterior-only surgical decompression between 2005 and 2014, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years, were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of postoperative residual ND, and neurological function was assessed immediately after surgery and at the final followup using the Frankel grading system. SITE scores, along with clinical and radiological data associated with residual ND, were collected. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify significant predictors.

Results: Patients with residual ND had significantly lower SITE scores than those without residual ND (4.3±1.3 vs. 7±1.8, p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified the SITE score as an independent predictor (odds ratio, 2.70; p=0.012). ROC analysis showed that a SITE score ≤6 predicted residual ND with 73.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with an area under the curve of 0.877 (p<0.001). Other significant predictors included cauda equina syndrome and a shorter symptom-to-surgery interval, both of which were associated with a higher risk of residual ND.

Conclusions: The SITE score is a reliable and independent predictor of residual ND after surgery for SEA. SITE scores <6 indicate a significantly higher risk of postoperative ND.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信