连接定性方法和开放研究

IF 21.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Madeleine Pownall
{"title":"连接定性方法和开放研究","authors":"Madeleine Pownall","doi":"10.1038/s44159-025-00477-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open research in psychology has advanced transparency and accountability but remains dominated by quantitative, positivist frameworks. For open research to be truly transformative, it must embrace methodological pluralism, learn from qualitative traditions and accommodate all research approaches.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"4 9","pages":"556-557"},"PeriodicalIF":21.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-025-00477-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging qualitative methods and open research\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Pownall\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44159-025-00477-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Open research in psychology has advanced transparency and accountability but remains dominated by quantitative, positivist frameworks. For open research to be truly transformative, it must embrace methodological pluralism, learn from qualitative traditions and accommodate all research approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature reviews psychology\",\"volume\":\"4 9\",\"pages\":\"556-557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-025-00477-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature reviews psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-025-00477-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-025-00477-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理学的开放研究提高了透明度和问责制,但仍然被定量的实证主义框架所主导。开放研究要真正具有变革性,就必须拥抱方法论的多元化,从定性传统中学习,并适应所有的研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging qualitative methods and open research
Open research in psychology has advanced transparency and accountability but remains dominated by quantitative, positivist frameworks. For open research to be truly transformative, it must embrace methodological pluralism, learn from qualitative traditions and accommodate all research approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信