社会联系的四种概念

IF 21.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elisa C. Baek, Razieh Pourafshari, Joseph B. Bayer
{"title":"社会联系的四种概念","authors":"Elisa C. Baek, Razieh Pourafshari, Joseph B. Bayer","doi":"10.1038/s44159-025-00455-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on social connection has proliferated across psychology over the past two decades, with rapid growth in the past 10–15 years. However, this broad interest has led to ‘social connection’ becoming a catch-all term, such that disparate strands of work are based on different approaches to conceptualization and measurement. In this Review, we synthesize prior research and highlight four distinct uses of the term ‘social connection’ — as subjective perceptions, social networks, interpersonal synchrony and interpersonal behaviours — and describe how research based in each conceptualization has contributed to understanding of the concept. We also review how constant connectivity via smartphones and social media has changed and challenged the landscape of social connection research. We conclude by highlighting the complex links between the different conceptualizations of social connection (and constant connectivity) and discuss how fragmentation poses challenges to scientific progress and public communication. By categorizing and clarifying subsets of the literature, we aim to facilitate communication across areas of psychological science and thereby guide research towards a more holistic understanding of social connection. The term ‘social connection’ is operationalized differently across disparate strands of research. In this Review, Baek et al. highlight four distinct uses of the term ‘social connection’ — as subjective perceptions, social networks, synchrony and interpersonal behaviours — and describe how research based in each conceptualization has contributed to understanding of the concept.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"4 8","pages":"506-517"},"PeriodicalIF":21.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The four conceptualizations of social connection\",\"authors\":\"Elisa C. Baek, Razieh Pourafshari, Joseph B. Bayer\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44159-025-00455-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on social connection has proliferated across psychology over the past two decades, with rapid growth in the past 10–15 years. However, this broad interest has led to ‘social connection’ becoming a catch-all term, such that disparate strands of work are based on different approaches to conceptualization and measurement. In this Review, we synthesize prior research and highlight four distinct uses of the term ‘social connection’ — as subjective perceptions, social networks, interpersonal synchrony and interpersonal behaviours — and describe how research based in each conceptualization has contributed to understanding of the concept. We also review how constant connectivity via smartphones and social media has changed and challenged the landscape of social connection research. We conclude by highlighting the complex links between the different conceptualizations of social connection (and constant connectivity) and discuss how fragmentation poses challenges to scientific progress and public communication. By categorizing and clarifying subsets of the literature, we aim to facilitate communication across areas of psychological science and thereby guide research towards a more holistic understanding of social connection. The term ‘social connection’ is operationalized differently across disparate strands of research. In this Review, Baek et al. highlight four distinct uses of the term ‘social connection’ — as subjective perceptions, social networks, synchrony and interpersonal behaviours — and describe how research based in each conceptualization has contributed to understanding of the concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature reviews psychology\",\"volume\":\"4 8\",\"pages\":\"506-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature reviews psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-025-00455-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-025-00455-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年里,对社会联系的研究在心理学领域激增,在过去的10-15年里增长迅速。然而,这种广泛的兴趣导致“社会联系”成为一个包罗万象的术语,因此不同的工作链基于不同的概念化和测量方法。在这篇综述中,我们综合了之前的研究,并强调了“社会联系”一词的四种不同用法——主观感知、社会网络、人际同步和人际行为——并描述了基于每种概念化的研究如何有助于对这一概念的理解。我们还回顾了通过智能手机和社交媒体的持续连接如何改变和挑战社会联系研究的格局。最后,我们强调了社会联系(和持续联系)的不同概念之间的复杂联系,并讨论了碎片化如何对科学进步和公共交流构成挑战。通过分类和澄清文献的子集,我们旨在促进心理科学领域之间的交流,从而指导研究朝着更全面地理解社会联系的方向发展。在不同的研究领域,“社会联系”一词的操作方式是不同的。在这篇综述中,Baek等人强调了“社会联系”一词的四种不同用法——主观感知、社会网络、同步性和人际行为——并描述了基于每种概念化的研究如何有助于对这一概念的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The four conceptualizations of social connection
Research on social connection has proliferated across psychology over the past two decades, with rapid growth in the past 10–15 years. However, this broad interest has led to ‘social connection’ becoming a catch-all term, such that disparate strands of work are based on different approaches to conceptualization and measurement. In this Review, we synthesize prior research and highlight four distinct uses of the term ‘social connection’ — as subjective perceptions, social networks, interpersonal synchrony and interpersonal behaviours — and describe how research based in each conceptualization has contributed to understanding of the concept. We also review how constant connectivity via smartphones and social media has changed and challenged the landscape of social connection research. We conclude by highlighting the complex links between the different conceptualizations of social connection (and constant connectivity) and discuss how fragmentation poses challenges to scientific progress and public communication. By categorizing and clarifying subsets of the literature, we aim to facilitate communication across areas of psychological science and thereby guide research towards a more holistic understanding of social connection. The term ‘social connection’ is operationalized differently across disparate strands of research. In this Review, Baek et al. highlight four distinct uses of the term ‘social connection’ — as subjective perceptions, social networks, synchrony and interpersonal behaviours — and describe how research based in each conceptualization has contributed to understanding of the concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信