重新定义发明:应对人工智能产生的发明的挑战

Ricardo Villegas Tovar, David Pinto Avendaño
{"title":"重新定义发明:应对人工智能产生的发明的挑战","authors":"Ricardo Villegas Tovar,&nbsp;David Pinto Avendaño","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00709-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant advancements in various fields, including the generation of inventions. However, this progress has raised complex questions regarding inventorship, particularly in cases where AI systems autonomously generate inventions. This paper explores the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) entities can be recognized as inventors of patentable inventions. It discusses the challenges of AI-generated inventions and proposes updated patent examination criteria and guidelines. The European Patent Office and the United States Patent and Trademark Office have recently updated their guidelines to affirm the inventive capacity of individuals while considering the role of AI as a support tool in the examination process. The paper concludes by suggesting the consideration of a sui generis form of protection for AI-generated inventions, similar to concepts in intellectual property law, but argues against granting legal personality and assets to AI. Instead, it advocates for updating patent examination criteria to accommodate AI’s role in the inventive process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4475 - 4479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00709-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing inventorship: addressing the challenge of artificial intelligence-generated inventions\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Villegas Tovar,&nbsp;David Pinto Avendaño\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43681-025-00709-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant advancements in various fields, including the generation of inventions. However, this progress has raised complex questions regarding inventorship, particularly in cases where AI systems autonomously generate inventions. This paper explores the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) entities can be recognized as inventors of patentable inventions. It discusses the challenges of AI-generated inventions and proposes updated patent examination criteria and guidelines. The European Patent Office and the United States Patent and Trademark Office have recently updated their guidelines to affirm the inventive capacity of individuals while considering the role of AI as a support tool in the examination process. The paper concludes by suggesting the consideration of a sui generis form of protection for AI-generated inventions, similar to concepts in intellectual property law, but argues against granting legal personality and assets to AI. Instead, it advocates for updating patent examination criteria to accommodate AI’s role in the inventive process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI and ethics\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"4475 - 4479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00709-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00709-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00709-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)的出现在各个领域带来了重大进步,包括发明的产生。然而,这一进展引发了关于发明的复杂问题,特别是在人工智能系统自主产生发明的情况下。本文探讨了人工智能(AI)实体是否可以被视为可专利发明的发明者的问题。它讨论了人工智能产生的发明的挑战,并提出了更新的专利审查标准和指南。欧洲专利局和美国专利商标局最近更新了其指导方针,以肯定个人的发明能力,同时考虑人工智能在审查过程中作为辅助工具的作用。论文最后建议考虑为人工智能产生的发明提供一种独特的保护形式,类似于知识产权法中的概念,但反对授予人工智能法律人格和资产。相反,它主张更新专利审查标准,以适应人工智能在发明过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceptualizing inventorship: addressing the challenge of artificial intelligence-generated inventions

The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant advancements in various fields, including the generation of inventions. However, this progress has raised complex questions regarding inventorship, particularly in cases where AI systems autonomously generate inventions. This paper explores the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) entities can be recognized as inventors of patentable inventions. It discusses the challenges of AI-generated inventions and proposes updated patent examination criteria and guidelines. The European Patent Office and the United States Patent and Trademark Office have recently updated their guidelines to affirm the inventive capacity of individuals while considering the role of AI as a support tool in the examination process. The paper concludes by suggesting the consideration of a sui generis form of protection for AI-generated inventions, similar to concepts in intellectual property law, but argues against granting legal personality and assets to AI. Instead, it advocates for updating patent examination criteria to accommodate AI’s role in the inventive process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信