{"title":"生成式人工智能平台作为数字创业的制度催化剂:实现、依赖和权力动态","authors":"Kisito F. Nzembayie , David Urbano","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study theorizes how recent generative AI (Gen AI) platforms operate as institutional catalysts of platform-dependent entrepreneurship (PDE). Integrating institutional theory, the external enablement framework, and innovation platform theory, we propose an integrative framework for explaining the emergence of PDE under reliance on non-substitutable, platform-governed capabilities. Using an abductive mixed-method case study of OpenAI's ecosystem (2020–2025), we trace how governance, boundary resources, and institutional signals shape entrepreneurial feasibility, scaling, and vulnerability. Our analysis identifies four catalytic institutional mechanisms—Infrastructure Provision, Capability Scaffolding, Market Legitimization, and Ecosystem Orchestration—that enable venture creation while simultaneously generating dependence. Temporal analysis reveals an enablement–dependence paradox: platforms accelerate entry by democratizing frontier capabilities, yet accumulate dependencies that expose ventures to governance shocks. Empirically, we show how enthusiasm gave way to crisis during OpenAI's GPT-5 release, illustrating governance overreach, trust erosion cascades, and choice removal as control. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103074"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative AI platforms as institutional catalysts of digital entrepreneurship: Enablement, dependence & power dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Kisito F. Nzembayie , David Urbano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study theorizes how recent generative AI (Gen AI) platforms operate as institutional catalysts of platform-dependent entrepreneurship (PDE). Integrating institutional theory, the external enablement framework, and innovation platform theory, we propose an integrative framework for explaining the emergence of PDE under reliance on non-substitutable, platform-governed capabilities. Using an abductive mixed-method case study of OpenAI's ecosystem (2020–2025), we trace how governance, boundary resources, and institutional signals shape entrepreneurial feasibility, scaling, and vulnerability. Our analysis identifies four catalytic institutional mechanisms—Infrastructure Provision, Capability Scaffolding, Market Legitimization, and Ecosystem Orchestration—that enable venture creation while simultaneously generating dependence. Temporal analysis reveals an enablement–dependence paradox: platforms accelerate entry by democratizing frontier capabilities, yet accumulate dependencies that expose ventures to governance shocks. Empirically, we show how enthusiasm gave way to crisis during OpenAI's GPT-5 release, illustrating governance overreach, trust erosion cascades, and choice removal as control. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002647\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Generative AI platforms as institutional catalysts of digital entrepreneurship: Enablement, dependence & power dynamics
This study theorizes how recent generative AI (Gen AI) platforms operate as institutional catalysts of platform-dependent entrepreneurship (PDE). Integrating institutional theory, the external enablement framework, and innovation platform theory, we propose an integrative framework for explaining the emergence of PDE under reliance on non-substitutable, platform-governed capabilities. Using an abductive mixed-method case study of OpenAI's ecosystem (2020–2025), we trace how governance, boundary resources, and institutional signals shape entrepreneurial feasibility, scaling, and vulnerability. Our analysis identifies four catalytic institutional mechanisms—Infrastructure Provision, Capability Scaffolding, Market Legitimization, and Ecosystem Orchestration—that enable venture creation while simultaneously generating dependence. Temporal analysis reveals an enablement–dependence paradox: platforms accelerate entry by democratizing frontier capabilities, yet accumulate dependencies that expose ventures to governance shocks. Empirically, we show how enthusiasm gave way to crisis during OpenAI's GPT-5 release, illustrating governance overreach, trust erosion cascades, and choice removal as control. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.