不同松动程度下十字形圆头榫卯的抗震性能研究

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yunpeng Chu , Qin Li , Mengqian Zeng , Jiahao Wang , Song Gu
{"title":"不同松动程度下十字形圆头榫卯的抗震性能研究","authors":"Yunpeng Chu ,&nbsp;Qin Li ,&nbsp;Mengqian Zeng ,&nbsp;Jiahao Wang ,&nbsp;Song Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cross hoop-head mortise and tenon joints are commonly used in corner joints of traditional timber structures such as halls and ancestral temples. Due to prevalent shrinkage-induced looseness during long-term service, quasi-static tests were conducted on 4 specimens, including 1 intact joint and 3 joints with varying looseness degrees, to investigate the effects of looseness on seismic performance, along with parametric analyses of friction coefficient, elastic modulus and axial load on bending resistance. Key findings include: (1) The intact joint primarily fails through tenon root shear failure and longitudinal cracks in beams, whereas loose joints exhibit longitudinal cracking at mortise-tenon interlocking area and shear fractures in mortise. Cracks developed in the Pu-pai Fang as looseness increased. (2) Beam 1 exhibited superior load-bearing performance in reverse loading compared to forward loading, whereas Beam 2 demonstrated comparable performance under both loading directions. Beam 1 showed higher sensitivity to looseness, but Beam 2 achieved greater ductility. (3) At 12 % looseness, peak bending moments declined by 28.37 % for Beam 1 and 12.55 % for Beam 2, while the cumulative energy dissipation of the joint decreased by 32.25 %. (4) When the friction coefficient increased from 0.2 to 0.6, the forward and reverse peak bending moments rose by 5.20 % and 5.54 %, respectively. As the longitudinal and transverse elastic moduli increased from 0.75E to 1.25E, the peak bending moments increased by 16.75 % and 37.70 %, respectively. Axial load exhibited negligible impact on the seismic performance of the joints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 110268"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic performance of cross hoop-head mortise and tenon joints under different degrees of looseness\",\"authors\":\"Yunpeng Chu ,&nbsp;Qin Li ,&nbsp;Mengqian Zeng ,&nbsp;Jiahao Wang ,&nbsp;Song Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cross hoop-head mortise and tenon joints are commonly used in corner joints of traditional timber structures such as halls and ancestral temples. Due to prevalent shrinkage-induced looseness during long-term service, quasi-static tests were conducted on 4 specimens, including 1 intact joint and 3 joints with varying looseness degrees, to investigate the effects of looseness on seismic performance, along with parametric analyses of friction coefficient, elastic modulus and axial load on bending resistance. Key findings include: (1) The intact joint primarily fails through tenon root shear failure and longitudinal cracks in beams, whereas loose joints exhibit longitudinal cracking at mortise-tenon interlocking area and shear fractures in mortise. Cracks developed in the Pu-pai Fang as looseness increased. (2) Beam 1 exhibited superior load-bearing performance in reverse loading compared to forward loading, whereas Beam 2 demonstrated comparable performance under both loading directions. Beam 1 showed higher sensitivity to looseness, but Beam 2 achieved greater ductility. (3) At 12 % looseness, peak bending moments declined by 28.37 % for Beam 1 and 12.55 % for Beam 2, while the cumulative energy dissipation of the joint decreased by 32.25 %. (4) When the friction coefficient increased from 0.2 to 0.6, the forward and reverse peak bending moments rose by 5.20 % and 5.54 %, respectively. As the longitudinal and transverse elastic moduli increased from 0.75E to 1.25E, the peak bending moments increased by 16.75 % and 37.70 %, respectively. Axial load exhibited negligible impact on the seismic performance of the joints.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020831\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

十字型圈头榫卯常用于殿堂、祠堂等传统木结构的转角接缝。针对长期使用过程中普遍存在的收缩松动现象,通过对1个完整节点和3个不同松动程度节点的4个试件进行拟静力试验,研究松动对抗震性能的影响,并对摩擦系数、弹性模量和轴向载荷对抗弯性能的影响进行参数化分析。主要发现如下:(1)完整节点主要通过榫头根部剪切破坏和梁的纵向裂缝破坏,而松散节点在榫头-榫头联锁区域表现为纵向开裂和榫头剪切断裂。随着松动程度的增加,普排方出现裂纹。(2) 1号梁在反向荷载作用下的承载性能优于正向荷载作用下的承载性能,2号梁在两种荷载作用下的承载性能均相当。梁1对松动表现出较高的敏感性,但梁2具有更大的延性。(3)在疏松度为12 %时,梁1的弯矩峰值下降28.37 %,梁2的弯矩峰值下降12.55 %,节点累积耗能下降32.25 %。(4)当摩擦系数从0.2增加到0.6时,正、反向弯矩峰值分别增加5.20 %和5.54 %。当纵向和横向弹性模量从0.75E增加到1.25E时,峰值弯矩分别增加16.75 %和37.70 %。轴向荷载对节点抗震性能的影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic performance of cross hoop-head mortise and tenon joints under different degrees of looseness
Cross hoop-head mortise and tenon joints are commonly used in corner joints of traditional timber structures such as halls and ancestral temples. Due to prevalent shrinkage-induced looseness during long-term service, quasi-static tests were conducted on 4 specimens, including 1 intact joint and 3 joints with varying looseness degrees, to investigate the effects of looseness on seismic performance, along with parametric analyses of friction coefficient, elastic modulus and axial load on bending resistance. Key findings include: (1) The intact joint primarily fails through tenon root shear failure and longitudinal cracks in beams, whereas loose joints exhibit longitudinal cracking at mortise-tenon interlocking area and shear fractures in mortise. Cracks developed in the Pu-pai Fang as looseness increased. (2) Beam 1 exhibited superior load-bearing performance in reverse loading compared to forward loading, whereas Beam 2 demonstrated comparable performance under both loading directions. Beam 1 showed higher sensitivity to looseness, but Beam 2 achieved greater ductility. (3) At 12 % looseness, peak bending moments declined by 28.37 % for Beam 1 and 12.55 % for Beam 2, while the cumulative energy dissipation of the joint decreased by 32.25 %. (4) When the friction coefficient increased from 0.2 to 0.6, the forward and reverse peak bending moments rose by 5.20 % and 5.54 %, respectively. As the longitudinal and transverse elastic moduli increased from 0.75E to 1.25E, the peak bending moments increased by 16.75 % and 37.70 %, respectively. Axial load exhibited negligible impact on the seismic performance of the joints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信