收敛还是发散?共同机构所有权对企业创新轨迹的影响

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yuhan He , Fengguang Lyu , Shougui Luo
{"title":"收敛还是发散?共同机构所有权对企业创新轨迹的影响","authors":"Yuhan He ,&nbsp;Fengguang Lyu ,&nbsp;Shougui Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how innovation trajectories are shaped is a central concern in innovation management research. This paper investigates whether common institutional ownership (CIO) drives convergence or divergence in the innovation trajectories of firms. Using a large sample of Chinese A-share listed firm-pairs from 2010 to 2022, we find that CIO significantly enhances innovation similarity among invested firms, highlighting the knowledge spillover effect in innovation governance. The results are robust across various model specifications and robustness checks. Further analysis reveals that CIO facilitates inter-firm patent collaboration and patent citation, and site visits play a positive moderating role, thereby fostering innovation convergence. We also find that intra-industry relationships and heterogeneous ownership structures amplify inter-firm knowledge flows, reinforcing the role of CIO in facilitating knowledge transfer. Overall, our study provides new insights into the governance effect of CIO, examining its role in inter-firm innovation behavior and advancing the understanding of innovation convergence at the micro level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103137"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergence or divergence? The impact of common institutional ownership on firms’ innovation trajectories\",\"authors\":\"Yuhan He ,&nbsp;Fengguang Lyu ,&nbsp;Shougui Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding how innovation trajectories are shaped is a central concern in innovation management research. This paper investigates whether common institutional ownership (CIO) drives convergence or divergence in the innovation trajectories of firms. Using a large sample of Chinese A-share listed firm-pairs from 2010 to 2022, we find that CIO significantly enhances innovation similarity among invested firms, highlighting the knowledge spillover effect in innovation governance. The results are robust across various model specifications and robustness checks. Further analysis reveals that CIO facilitates inter-firm patent collaboration and patent citation, and site visits play a positive moderating role, thereby fostering innovation convergence. We also find that intra-industry relationships and heterogeneous ownership structures amplify inter-firm knowledge flows, reinforcing the role of CIO in facilitating knowledge transfer. Overall, our study provides new insights into the governance effect of CIO, examining its role in inter-firm innovation behavior and advancing the understanding of innovation convergence at the micro level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003939\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解创新轨迹是如何形成的是创新管理研究的中心问题。本文研究了共同机构所有权(CIO)在企业创新轨迹中是推动趋同还是分化。利用2010 - 2022年中国a股上市公司对的大样本,我们发现CIO显著增强了被投资公司之间的创新相似性,突出了创新治理中的知识溢出效应。结果在各种模型规范和鲁棒性检查中都是鲁棒的。进一步分析表明,CIO对企业间专利合作和专利引用具有促进作用,而实地考察对企业间专利引用起到正向调节作用,从而促进创新趋同。我们还发现,行业内关系和异质性所有权结构放大了企业间的知识流动,强化了CIO促进知识转移的作用。总体而言,我们的研究为CIO的治理效应提供了新的视角,考察了其在企业间创新行为中的作用,并在微观层面上推进了对创新趋同的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Convergence or divergence? The impact of common institutional ownership on firms’ innovation trajectories
Understanding how innovation trajectories are shaped is a central concern in innovation management research. This paper investigates whether common institutional ownership (CIO) drives convergence or divergence in the innovation trajectories of firms. Using a large sample of Chinese A-share listed firm-pairs from 2010 to 2022, we find that CIO significantly enhances innovation similarity among invested firms, highlighting the knowledge spillover effect in innovation governance. The results are robust across various model specifications and robustness checks. Further analysis reveals that CIO facilitates inter-firm patent collaboration and patent citation, and site visits play a positive moderating role, thereby fostering innovation convergence. We also find that intra-industry relationships and heterogeneous ownership structures amplify inter-firm knowledge flows, reinforcing the role of CIO in facilitating knowledge transfer. Overall, our study provides new insights into the governance effect of CIO, examining its role in inter-firm innovation behavior and advancing the understanding of innovation convergence at the micro level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信