{"title":"收敛还是发散?共同机构所有权对企业创新轨迹的影响","authors":"Yuhan He , Fengguang Lyu , Shougui Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how innovation trajectories are shaped is a central concern in innovation management research. This paper investigates whether common institutional ownership (CIO) drives convergence or divergence in the innovation trajectories of firms. Using a large sample of Chinese A-share listed firm-pairs from 2010 to 2022, we find that CIO significantly enhances innovation similarity among invested firms, highlighting the knowledge spillover effect in innovation governance. The results are robust across various model specifications and robustness checks. Further analysis reveals that CIO facilitates inter-firm patent collaboration and patent citation, and site visits play a positive moderating role, thereby fostering innovation convergence. We also find that intra-industry relationships and heterogeneous ownership structures amplify inter-firm knowledge flows, reinforcing the role of CIO in facilitating knowledge transfer. Overall, our study provides new insights into the governance effect of CIO, examining its role in inter-firm innovation behavior and advancing the understanding of innovation convergence at the micro level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103137"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergence or divergence? The impact of common institutional ownership on firms’ innovation trajectories\",\"authors\":\"Yuhan He , Fengguang Lyu , Shougui Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding how innovation trajectories are shaped is a central concern in innovation management research. This paper investigates whether common institutional ownership (CIO) drives convergence or divergence in the innovation trajectories of firms. Using a large sample of Chinese A-share listed firm-pairs from 2010 to 2022, we find that CIO significantly enhances innovation similarity among invested firms, highlighting the knowledge spillover effect in innovation governance. The results are robust across various model specifications and robustness checks. Further analysis reveals that CIO facilitates inter-firm patent collaboration and patent citation, and site visits play a positive moderating role, thereby fostering innovation convergence. We also find that intra-industry relationships and heterogeneous ownership structures amplify inter-firm knowledge flows, reinforcing the role of CIO in facilitating knowledge transfer. Overall, our study provides new insights into the governance effect of CIO, examining its role in inter-firm innovation behavior and advancing the understanding of innovation convergence at the micro level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003939\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Convergence or divergence? The impact of common institutional ownership on firms’ innovation trajectories
Understanding how innovation trajectories are shaped is a central concern in innovation management research. This paper investigates whether common institutional ownership (CIO) drives convergence or divergence in the innovation trajectories of firms. Using a large sample of Chinese A-share listed firm-pairs from 2010 to 2022, we find that CIO significantly enhances innovation similarity among invested firms, highlighting the knowledge spillover effect in innovation governance. The results are robust across various model specifications and robustness checks. Further analysis reveals that CIO facilitates inter-firm patent collaboration and patent citation, and site visits play a positive moderating role, thereby fostering innovation convergence. We also find that intra-industry relationships and heterogeneous ownership structures amplify inter-firm knowledge flows, reinforcing the role of CIO in facilitating knowledge transfer. Overall, our study provides new insights into the governance effect of CIO, examining its role in inter-firm innovation behavior and advancing the understanding of innovation convergence at the micro level.
期刊介绍:
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance