期权价格不对称,投机和股票卖空成本

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jiantao Ma , Yuanyi Zhang
{"title":"期权价格不对称,投机和股票卖空成本","authors":"Jiantao Ma ,&nbsp;Yuanyi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We introduce <em>implied variance asymmetry</em> (<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span>) — the weighted difference between out-of-the-money call and put option prices — as a predictor of cross-sectional option returns. We find that <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> negatively predicts future delta-hedged call returns and positively predicts future delta-hedged put returns. These predictive relationships reflect distinct investor behaviors: retail investors drive the overpricing of high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options through speculative demand, whereas informed short-sellers bid up prices of low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> puts as substitutes for constrained stock short-selling. Furthermore, stocks and put options characterized by low <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> and high short-sale costs experience significantly lower subsequent excess returns. This pattern suggests that low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> put buyers pay a premium and they correctly anticipate future stock price declines. In contrast, high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options exhibit temporary mispricing driven by uninformed speculation, which rapidly reverses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 107539"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Option price asymmetry, speculation and stock short-sale cost\",\"authors\":\"Jiantao Ma ,&nbsp;Yuanyi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We introduce <em>implied variance asymmetry</em> (<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span>) — the weighted difference between out-of-the-money call and put option prices — as a predictor of cross-sectional option returns. We find that <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> negatively predicts future delta-hedged call returns and positively predicts future delta-hedged put returns. These predictive relationships reflect distinct investor behaviors: retail investors drive the overpricing of high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options through speculative demand, whereas informed short-sellers bid up prices of low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> puts as substitutes for constrained stock short-selling. Furthermore, stocks and put options characterized by low <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> and high short-sale costs experience significantly lower subsequent excess returns. This pattern suggests that low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> put buyers pay a premium and they correctly anticipate future stock price declines. In contrast, high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options exhibit temporary mispricing driven by uninformed speculation, which rapidly reverses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001591\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们引入隐含方差不对称(IVA)——价外看涨期权和看跌期权价格之间的加权差值——作为横断面期权收益的预测因子。我们发现IVA负向预测未来delta对冲看涨期权的收益,正向预测未来delta对冲看跌期权的收益。这些预测关系反映了不同的投资者行为:散户投资者通过投机需求推动高iva看涨期权的定价过高,而知情的卖空者则推高低iva看跌期权的价格,作为受限股票卖空的替代品。此外,以低IVA和高卖空成本为特征的股票和看跌期权的后续超额收益明显较低。这种模式表明,低iva看跌期权的买家支付了溢价,他们正确地预测了未来股价的下跌。相比之下,高iva看涨期权在不知情的投机行为的驱动下表现出暂时的错误定价,这种错误定价会迅速逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Option price asymmetry, speculation and stock short-sale cost
We introduce implied variance asymmetry (IVA) — the weighted difference between out-of-the-money call and put option prices — as a predictor of cross-sectional option returns. We find that IVA negatively predicts future delta-hedged call returns and positively predicts future delta-hedged put returns. These predictive relationships reflect distinct investor behaviors: retail investors drive the overpricing of high-IVA call options through speculative demand, whereas informed short-sellers bid up prices of low-IVA puts as substitutes for constrained stock short-selling. Furthermore, stocks and put options characterized by low IVA and high short-sale costs experience significantly lower subsequent excess returns. This pattern suggests that low-IVA put buyers pay a premium and they correctly anticipate future stock price declines. In contrast, high-IVA call options exhibit temporary mispricing driven by uninformed speculation, which rapidly reverses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
262
期刊介绍: The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信