{"title":"期权价格不对称,投机和股票卖空成本","authors":"Jiantao Ma , Yuanyi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We introduce <em>implied variance asymmetry</em> (<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span>) — the weighted difference between out-of-the-money call and put option prices — as a predictor of cross-sectional option returns. We find that <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> negatively predicts future delta-hedged call returns and positively predicts future delta-hedged put returns. These predictive relationships reflect distinct investor behaviors: retail investors drive the overpricing of high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options through speculative demand, whereas informed short-sellers bid up prices of low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> puts as substitutes for constrained stock short-selling. Furthermore, stocks and put options characterized by low <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> and high short-sale costs experience significantly lower subsequent excess returns. This pattern suggests that low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> put buyers pay a premium and they correctly anticipate future stock price declines. In contrast, high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options exhibit temporary mispricing driven by uninformed speculation, which rapidly reverses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 107539"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Option price asymmetry, speculation and stock short-sale cost\",\"authors\":\"Jiantao Ma , Yuanyi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We introduce <em>implied variance asymmetry</em> (<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span>) — the weighted difference between out-of-the-money call and put option prices — as a predictor of cross-sectional option returns. We find that <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> negatively predicts future delta-hedged call returns and positively predicts future delta-hedged put returns. These predictive relationships reflect distinct investor behaviors: retail investors drive the overpricing of high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options through speculative demand, whereas informed short-sellers bid up prices of low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> puts as substitutes for constrained stock short-selling. Furthermore, stocks and put options characterized by low <span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> and high short-sale costs experience significantly lower subsequent excess returns. This pattern suggests that low-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> put buyers pay a premium and they correctly anticipate future stock price declines. In contrast, high-<span><math><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>V</mi><mi>A</mi></mrow></math></span> call options exhibit temporary mispricing driven by uninformed speculation, which rapidly reverses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001591\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426625001591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Option price asymmetry, speculation and stock short-sale cost
We introduce implied variance asymmetry () — the weighted difference between out-of-the-money call and put option prices — as a predictor of cross-sectional option returns. We find that negatively predicts future delta-hedged call returns and positively predicts future delta-hedged put returns. These predictive relationships reflect distinct investor behaviors: retail investors drive the overpricing of high- call options through speculative demand, whereas informed short-sellers bid up prices of low- puts as substitutes for constrained stock short-selling. Furthermore, stocks and put options characterized by low and high short-sale costs experience significantly lower subsequent excess returns. This pattern suggests that low- put buyers pay a premium and they correctly anticipate future stock price declines. In contrast, high- call options exhibit temporary mispricing driven by uninformed speculation, which rapidly reverses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.