利用人工智能技术从乳房x线摄影扫描中的肿瘤轮廓分类良性与恶性肿瘤

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Hamidreza Mortazavy Beni, Fatemeh Yekta Asaei
{"title":"利用人工智能技术从乳房x线摄影扫描中的肿瘤轮廓分类良性与恶性肿瘤","authors":"Hamidreza Mortazavy Beni,&nbsp;Fatemeh Yekta Asaei","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of death among women due to cancer. With the early diagnosis of this condition, the probability of survival will increase. For this purpose, medical imaging methods, especially mammography, are used for screening and early diagnosis of breast abnormalities. The main goal of this study is to distinguish benign or malignant tumors based on tumor morphology features extracted from tumor outlines extracted from mammography images. Unlike previous studies, this study does not use the mammographic image itself but only extracts the exact outline of the tumor.</div><div>These outlines were extracted from a new and publicly available mammography database published in 2024. The features outlines were calculated using known pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), including VGG16, ResNet50, Xception65, AlexNet, DenseNet, GoogLeNet, Inception-v3, and a combination of them to improve performance. These pre-trained networks have been used in many studies in various fields. In the classification part, known Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and a combination of them have been compared in outcome measures, namely accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and precision. Also, with the use of data augmentation, the dataset size was increased about 6–8 times, and the K-fold cross-validation technique (K = 5) was used in this study. Based on the performed simulations, a combination of the features from all pre-trained deep networks and the NB classifier resulted in the best possible outcomes with 88.13 % accuracy, 92.52 % specificity, 83.73 % sensitivity, and 92.04 % precision. Furthermore, validation on DMID dataset using ResNet50 features along with NB classifier, led to 92.03 % accuracy, 95.57 % specificity, 88.49 % sensitivity, and 95.23 % precision. This study sheds light on using AI algorithms to prevent biopsy tests and speed up breast cancer tumor classification using tumor outlines in mammographic images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 111118"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benign vs malignant tumors classification from tumor outlines in mammography scans using artificial intelligence techniques\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Mortazavy Beni,&nbsp;Fatemeh Yekta Asaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of death among women due to cancer. With the early diagnosis of this condition, the probability of survival will increase. For this purpose, medical imaging methods, especially mammography, are used for screening and early diagnosis of breast abnormalities. The main goal of this study is to distinguish benign or malignant tumors based on tumor morphology features extracted from tumor outlines extracted from mammography images. Unlike previous studies, this study does not use the mammographic image itself but only extracts the exact outline of the tumor.</div><div>These outlines were extracted from a new and publicly available mammography database published in 2024. The features outlines were calculated using known pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), including VGG16, ResNet50, Xception65, AlexNet, DenseNet, GoogLeNet, Inception-v3, and a combination of them to improve performance. These pre-trained networks have been used in many studies in various fields. In the classification part, known Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and a combination of them have been compared in outcome measures, namely accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and precision. Also, with the use of data augmentation, the dataset size was increased about 6–8 times, and the K-fold cross-validation technique (K = 5) was used in this study. Based on the performed simulations, a combination of the features from all pre-trained deep networks and the NB classifier resulted in the best possible outcomes with 88.13 % accuracy, 92.52 % specificity, 83.73 % sensitivity, and 92.04 % precision. Furthermore, validation on DMID dataset using ResNet50 features along with NB classifier, led to 92.03 % accuracy, 95.57 % specificity, 88.49 % sensitivity, and 95.23 % precision. This study sheds light on using AI algorithms to prevent biopsy tests and speed up breast cancer tumor classification using tumor outlines in mammographic images.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525014714\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525014714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌是妇女因癌症死亡的最重要原因之一。随着这种情况的早期诊断,生存的可能性将增加。为此目的,医学成像方法,特别是乳房x线照相术,用于筛查和早期诊断乳房异常。本研究的主要目的是基于乳房x线摄影图像中提取的肿瘤轮廓提取的肿瘤形态特征来区分良恶性肿瘤。与以往的研究不同,这项研究不使用乳房x线摄影图像本身,而只是提取肿瘤的确切轮廓。这些轮廓是从2024年发布的一个新的公开的乳房x光检查数据库中提取的。使用已知的预训练卷积神经网络(CNN)计算特征轮廓,包括VGG16, ResNet50, Xception65, AlexNet, DenseNet, GoogLeNet, Inception-v3,以及它们的组合以提高性能。这些预训练的网络已经应用于许多领域的研究中。在分类部分,比较了已知的机器学习(ML)算法,如支持向量机(SVM)、k -最近邻(KNN)、神经网络(NN)、Naïve贝叶斯(NB)、决策树(DT)及其组合的结果指标,即准确性、特异性、灵敏度和精密度。此外,通过使用数据增强,数据集大小增加了约6-8倍,并在本研究中使用K-fold交叉验证技术(K = 5)。基于所进行的模拟,将所有预训练的深度网络的特征与NB分类器相结合产生了最佳结果,准确率为88.13%,特异性为92.52%,灵敏度为83.73%,精度为92.04%。此外,使用ResNet50特征和NB分类器在DMID数据集上进行验证,准确率为92.03%,特异性为95.57%,灵敏度为88.49%,精密度为95.23%。这项研究揭示了利用人工智能算法来防止活检检查,并利用乳房x线摄影图像中的肿瘤轮廓加速乳腺癌肿瘤分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benign vs malignant tumors classification from tumor outlines in mammography scans using artificial intelligence techniques
Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of death among women due to cancer. With the early diagnosis of this condition, the probability of survival will increase. For this purpose, medical imaging methods, especially mammography, are used for screening and early diagnosis of breast abnormalities. The main goal of this study is to distinguish benign or malignant tumors based on tumor morphology features extracted from tumor outlines extracted from mammography images. Unlike previous studies, this study does not use the mammographic image itself but only extracts the exact outline of the tumor.
These outlines were extracted from a new and publicly available mammography database published in 2024. The features outlines were calculated using known pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), including VGG16, ResNet50, Xception65, AlexNet, DenseNet, GoogLeNet, Inception-v3, and a combination of them to improve performance. These pre-trained networks have been used in many studies in various fields. In the classification part, known Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and a combination of them have been compared in outcome measures, namely accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and precision. Also, with the use of data augmentation, the dataset size was increased about 6–8 times, and the K-fold cross-validation technique (K = 5) was used in this study. Based on the performed simulations, a combination of the features from all pre-trained deep networks and the NB classifier resulted in the best possible outcomes with 88.13 % accuracy, 92.52 % specificity, 83.73 % sensitivity, and 92.04 % precision. Furthermore, validation on DMID dataset using ResNet50 features along with NB classifier, led to 92.03 % accuracy, 95.57 % specificity, 88.49 % sensitivity, and 95.23 % precision. This study sheds light on using AI algorithms to prevent biopsy tests and speed up breast cancer tumor classification using tumor outlines in mammographic images.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信