Inés Mesa Gandolfo , Justin D. Derner , R. Mark Enns , Larry A. Kuehn , Melissa K. Johnston , Sean P. Kearney , Sara E. Place , Edward J. Raynor , John P. Ritten , Anna M. Shadbolt , Kimberly R. Stackhouse-Lawson , Juan de J. Vargas , Pedro H.V. Carvalho
{"title":"西部大平原不同背景阶段的家畜生长性能和肠道气体通量","authors":"Inés Mesa Gandolfo , Justin D. Derner , R. Mark Enns , Larry A. Kuehn , Melissa K. Johnston , Sean P. Kearney , Sara E. Place , Edward J. Raynor , John P. Ritten , Anna M. Shadbolt , Kimberly R. Stackhouse-Lawson , Juan de J. Vargas , Pedro H.V. Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2025.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assessed the changes in growth performance and enteric gas flux of stocker steers across the postweaning phase and stocker phase of the production system in the western Great Plains. The objectives were to (1) evaluate growth performance and gas flux of steers originating from different production environments (e.g., diet and management) in the two phases of backgrounding, and (2) compare automated head-chamber system (AHCS)-measured enteric methane (CH<sub>4,</sub> g CH<sub>4</sub> d<sup>−1</sup>) emissions to predictions using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 2 methodology. In the winter postweaning phase, one group was stocked on shortgrass rangeland, and two groups were managed in drylot before all three groups were collectively stocked on summer rangeland. Steers winter-stocked on Colorado rangeland (hereafter, Colorado-grazing steers) doubled their average daily gain (ADG, kg steer<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>) during the summer stocker phase on extensive rangeland. Conversely, steers that spent the winter postweaning phase in drylot in Nebraska (hereafter, Nebraska-drylot steers) or Colorado (hereafter, Colorado-drylot steers) had the same or reduced ADG in the stocker phase compared with the postweaning phase. Colorado-grazing steers produced 58% more CH<sub>4</sub> in the stocker phase than in the postweaning phase, whereas Nebraska-drylot steers emitted 11% lower CH<sub>4</sub> in the stocker phase than in the postweaning phase. Methane production was similar between phases for Colorado-drylot steers. Concomitantly, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity (g CH<sub>4</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> ADG<sup>−1</sup>) decreased for Colorado-grazing and Nebraska-drylot steers, whereas no difference was detected for Colorado-drylot steers between phases. A comparison of measured enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions to IPCC predictions for the same animal class and diet in each production phase revealed that predictions for five of six animal-phase combinations diverged from AHCS-measured CH<sub>4</sub> production. This longitudinal experiment suggests that accounting for the variation in gas flux across each phase in growing steers may inform assessments of the sustainability of beef cattle related to greenhouse gas mitigation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"103 ","pages":"Pages 247-257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steer Growth Performance and Enteric Gas Flux Across Backgrounding Phases in the Western Great Plains\",\"authors\":\"Inés Mesa Gandolfo , Justin D. Derner , R. Mark Enns , Larry A. Kuehn , Melissa K. Johnston , Sean P. Kearney , Sara E. Place , Edward J. Raynor , John P. Ritten , Anna M. Shadbolt , Kimberly R. Stackhouse-Lawson , Juan de J. Vargas , Pedro H.V. Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rama.2025.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study assessed the changes in growth performance and enteric gas flux of stocker steers across the postweaning phase and stocker phase of the production system in the western Great Plains. The objectives were to (1) evaluate growth performance and gas flux of steers originating from different production environments (e.g., diet and management) in the two phases of backgrounding, and (2) compare automated head-chamber system (AHCS)-measured enteric methane (CH<sub>4,</sub> g CH<sub>4</sub> d<sup>−1</sup>) emissions to predictions using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 2 methodology. In the winter postweaning phase, one group was stocked on shortgrass rangeland, and two groups were managed in drylot before all three groups were collectively stocked on summer rangeland. Steers winter-stocked on Colorado rangeland (hereafter, Colorado-grazing steers) doubled their average daily gain (ADG, kg steer<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>) during the summer stocker phase on extensive rangeland. Conversely, steers that spent the winter postweaning phase in drylot in Nebraska (hereafter, Nebraska-drylot steers) or Colorado (hereafter, Colorado-drylot steers) had the same or reduced ADG in the stocker phase compared with the postweaning phase. Colorado-grazing steers produced 58% more CH<sub>4</sub> in the stocker phase than in the postweaning phase, whereas Nebraska-drylot steers emitted 11% lower CH<sub>4</sub> in the stocker phase than in the postweaning phase. Methane production was similar between phases for Colorado-drylot steers. Concomitantly, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity (g CH<sub>4</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> ADG<sup>−1</sup>) decreased for Colorado-grazing and Nebraska-drylot steers, whereas no difference was detected for Colorado-drylot steers between phases. A comparison of measured enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions to IPCC predictions for the same animal class and diet in each production phase revealed that predictions for five of six animal-phase combinations diverged from AHCS-measured CH<sub>4</sub> production. This longitudinal experiment suggests that accounting for the variation in gas flux across each phase in growing steers may inform assessments of the sustainability of beef cattle related to greenhouse gas mitigation strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 247-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742425001150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742425001150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了大平原西部生产系统断奶后阶段和饲养阶段饲牛生长性能和肠道气体通量的变化。目标是(1)在两个背景阶段评估来自不同生产环境(例如,饮食和管理)的阉牛的生长性能和气体通量,以及(2)将自动头室系统(AHCS)测量的肠道甲烷(CH4, g CH4 d- 1)排放量与使用政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第2层方法的预测进行比较。冬季断奶后,1组放养在短草草地上,2组放养在旱地上,3组放养在夏季草地上。冬季放养在科罗拉多牧场的阉牛(以下简称科罗拉多放牧阉牛)在夏季放养阶段的平均日增重(日增重,kg阉牛−1天−1)翻了一番。相反,在内布拉斯加州(下称内布拉斯加州-旱地)或科罗拉多州(下称科罗拉多州-旱地)的旱地度过冬季断奶后阶段的阉牛,在库存阶段的平均日增重与断奶后阶段相同或更低。科罗拉多放牧阉牛在放牧期产生的CH4比断奶后多58%,而内布拉斯加旱地阉牛在放牧期产生的CH4比断奶后低11%。科罗拉多旱地舵手在不同阶段的甲烷产量相似。与此同时,colorado -放牧和nebraska -旱地的CH4强度(g CH4 kg - 1 ADG - 1)下降,而colorado -旱地的CH4强度在不同阶段之间没有差异。将测量到的肠道甲烷排放量与IPCC对同一动物类别和饮食在每个生产阶段的预测进行比较,发现对六种动物阶段组合中的五种的预测与ahcs测量的甲烷排放量存在差异。这一纵向实验表明,考虑肉牛生长各阶段气体通量的变化,可以为与温室气体减排战略相关的肉牛可持续性评估提供信息。
Steer Growth Performance and Enteric Gas Flux Across Backgrounding Phases in the Western Great Plains
This study assessed the changes in growth performance and enteric gas flux of stocker steers across the postweaning phase and stocker phase of the production system in the western Great Plains. The objectives were to (1) evaluate growth performance and gas flux of steers originating from different production environments (e.g., diet and management) in the two phases of backgrounding, and (2) compare automated head-chamber system (AHCS)-measured enteric methane (CH4, g CH4 d−1) emissions to predictions using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 2 methodology. In the winter postweaning phase, one group was stocked on shortgrass rangeland, and two groups were managed in drylot before all three groups were collectively stocked on summer rangeland. Steers winter-stocked on Colorado rangeland (hereafter, Colorado-grazing steers) doubled their average daily gain (ADG, kg steer−1 day−1) during the summer stocker phase on extensive rangeland. Conversely, steers that spent the winter postweaning phase in drylot in Nebraska (hereafter, Nebraska-drylot steers) or Colorado (hereafter, Colorado-drylot steers) had the same or reduced ADG in the stocker phase compared with the postweaning phase. Colorado-grazing steers produced 58% more CH4 in the stocker phase than in the postweaning phase, whereas Nebraska-drylot steers emitted 11% lower CH4 in the stocker phase than in the postweaning phase. Methane production was similar between phases for Colorado-drylot steers. Concomitantly, CH4 intensity (g CH4 kg−1 ADG−1) decreased for Colorado-grazing and Nebraska-drylot steers, whereas no difference was detected for Colorado-drylot steers between phases. A comparison of measured enteric CH4 emissions to IPCC predictions for the same animal class and diet in each production phase revealed that predictions for five of six animal-phase combinations diverged from AHCS-measured CH4 production. This longitudinal experiment suggests that accounting for the variation in gas flux across each phase in growing steers may inform assessments of the sustainability of beef cattle related to greenhouse gas mitigation strategies.
期刊介绍:
Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes.
Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.