Maleea D Holbert,Yvonne Singer,Tina Palmieri,John Rose,Kevin Mackey,Sonia Singh,Nathan Kuppermann,Fiona Wood,Victor Joe,Tanesha A Dimanopoulos,Cody Frear,Steven M McPhail,Roy Kimble,Leila Cuttle,Robert Katzer,Bronwyn Griffin
{"title":"冷却自来水作为烧伤的急救方法。","authors":"Maleea D Holbert,Yvonne Singer,Tina Palmieri,John Rose,Kevin Mackey,Sonia Singh,Nathan Kuppermann,Fiona Wood,Victor Joe,Tanesha A Dimanopoulos,Cody Frear,Steven M McPhail,Roy Kimble,Leila Cuttle,Robert Katzer,Bronwyn Griffin","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVE\r\nThe application of 20 minutes of cool running water within 3 hours of a burn injury significantly improves patient burn-related outcomes. To facilitate the integration of 20 minutes of cool running water into clinical practice in the United States, this investigation aimed to determine barriers and facilitators to implementing 20 minutes of cool running water in out-of-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) and in-hospital emergency departments (EDs) and to codesign tailored strategies for its routine use in acute burn first aid.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nUsing a sequential mixed-methods design, we identified barriers and facilitators to 20 minutes of cool running water implementation and codesigned strategies to enhance its implementation. EMS and ED clinicians completed an online questionnaire assessing perceived barriers and facilitators, with responses coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of participants further examined determinants and codesigned implementation strategies.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 371 (210 EMS, 161 ED) clinicians participated in the questionnaire, and 22 (14 EMS, 8 ED) participated in interviews. Twelve key determinants were identified across 4 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. Implementation barriers included a lack of resources, challenges adapting 20 minutes of cool running water to local clinical settings, and the absence of external policies incorporating burn first aid cooling, whereas facilitators included high clinician motivation, strong professional networks, and a supportive clinical culture. Codesigned strategies to enhance 20 minutes of cool running water uptake included portable irrigation equipment, nursing-driven protocols, and policy updates.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAlthough clinicians appear motivated to implement 20 minutes of cool running water, infrastructure, workflow, and policy challenges hinder widespread adoption. Addressing these barriers through targeted codesigned 20 minutes of cool running water implementation strategies will facilitate integration into EMS and ED settings, improving burn care outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cool Running Water as a First Aid Treatment for Burn Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Maleea D Holbert,Yvonne Singer,Tina Palmieri,John Rose,Kevin Mackey,Sonia Singh,Nathan Kuppermann,Fiona Wood,Victor Joe,Tanesha A Dimanopoulos,Cody Frear,Steven M McPhail,Roy Kimble,Leila Cuttle,Robert Katzer,Bronwyn Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STUDY OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThe application of 20 minutes of cool running water within 3 hours of a burn injury significantly improves patient burn-related outcomes. To facilitate the integration of 20 minutes of cool running water into clinical practice in the United States, this investigation aimed to determine barriers and facilitators to implementing 20 minutes of cool running water in out-of-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) and in-hospital emergency departments (EDs) and to codesign tailored strategies for its routine use in acute burn first aid.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nUsing a sequential mixed-methods design, we identified barriers and facilitators to 20 minutes of cool running water implementation and codesigned strategies to enhance its implementation. EMS and ED clinicians completed an online questionnaire assessing perceived barriers and facilitators, with responses coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of participants further examined determinants and codesigned implementation strategies.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 371 (210 EMS, 161 ED) clinicians participated in the questionnaire, and 22 (14 EMS, 8 ED) participated in interviews. Twelve key determinants were identified across 4 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. Implementation barriers included a lack of resources, challenges adapting 20 minutes of cool running water to local clinical settings, and the absence of external policies incorporating burn first aid cooling, whereas facilitators included high clinician motivation, strong professional networks, and a supportive clinical culture. Codesigned strategies to enhance 20 minutes of cool running water uptake included portable irrigation equipment, nursing-driven protocols, and policy updates.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nAlthough clinicians appear motivated to implement 20 minutes of cool running water, infrastructure, workflow, and policy challenges hinder widespread adoption. Addressing these barriers through targeted codesigned 20 minutes of cool running water implementation strategies will facilitate integration into EMS and ED settings, improving burn care outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.08.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.08.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cool Running Water as a First Aid Treatment for Burn Injuries.
STUDY OBJECTIVE
The application of 20 minutes of cool running water within 3 hours of a burn injury significantly improves patient burn-related outcomes. To facilitate the integration of 20 minutes of cool running water into clinical practice in the United States, this investigation aimed to determine barriers and facilitators to implementing 20 minutes of cool running water in out-of-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) and in-hospital emergency departments (EDs) and to codesign tailored strategies for its routine use in acute burn first aid.
METHODS
Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we identified barriers and facilitators to 20 minutes of cool running water implementation and codesigned strategies to enhance its implementation. EMS and ED clinicians completed an online questionnaire assessing perceived barriers and facilitators, with responses coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of participants further examined determinants and codesigned implementation strategies.
RESULTS
A total of 371 (210 EMS, 161 ED) clinicians participated in the questionnaire, and 22 (14 EMS, 8 ED) participated in interviews. Twelve key determinants were identified across 4 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. Implementation barriers included a lack of resources, challenges adapting 20 minutes of cool running water to local clinical settings, and the absence of external policies incorporating burn first aid cooling, whereas facilitators included high clinician motivation, strong professional networks, and a supportive clinical culture. Codesigned strategies to enhance 20 minutes of cool running water uptake included portable irrigation equipment, nursing-driven protocols, and policy updates.
CONCLUSION
Although clinicians appear motivated to implement 20 minutes of cool running water, infrastructure, workflow, and policy challenges hinder widespread adoption. Addressing these barriers through targeted codesigned 20 minutes of cool running water implementation strategies will facilitate integration into EMS and ED settings, improving burn care outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.