美国疾病控制与预防中心女性健康研究的覆盖范围和影响,2018-2023。

Victoria E Dunkley, Joy Ortega, Martha Knuth, Christie Kim, Mary G Reynolds, Bao-Ping Zhu
{"title":"美国疾病控制与预防中心女性健康研究的覆盖范围和影响,2018-2023。","authors":"Victoria E Dunkley, Joy Ortega, Martha Knuth, Christie Kim, Mary G Reynolds, Bao-Ping Zhu","doi":"10.1177/15409996251379401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the public health impact of women's health research is crucial for improving health outcomes and guiding future research priorities. Bibliometric analysis offers a unique suite of tools to identify opportunities to increase impact and measure the dissemination of women's health research. Using 2018-2021 mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System, we utilized age-adjusted death rates to identify conditions with the highest relative mortality risk for females versus males. Our analysis showed that breast cancer, Alzheimer's disease, infections of the kidney, and acute rheumatic fever and chronic rheumatic heart diseases were associated with the highest relative mortality risk for females. Using a systematic keyword search strategy, we identified 219 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-authored publications published between 2018 and 2023 featuring these conditions in a database of CDC-authored publications. For relevant publications on each condition, we evaluated five bibliometric indicators measuring media attention, academic citations, and policy citations. Overall, CDC's publications on these conditions did not demonstrate a gap in media attention, academic citations, and policy citations compared with other agency publications, underscoring the agency's effectiveness in disseminating its research on these topics. Assessing bibliometric indicators for published research on conditions with disproportionate relative mortality risk for females can reveal potential gaps in research coverage, highlight research successes, and inform strategic decisions for disseminating women's health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Reach and Impact of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Women's Health Research, 2018-2023.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria E Dunkley, Joy Ortega, Martha Knuth, Christie Kim, Mary G Reynolds, Bao-Ping Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15409996251379401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the public health impact of women's health research is crucial for improving health outcomes and guiding future research priorities. Bibliometric analysis offers a unique suite of tools to identify opportunities to increase impact and measure the dissemination of women's health research. Using 2018-2021 mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System, we utilized age-adjusted death rates to identify conditions with the highest relative mortality risk for females versus males. Our analysis showed that breast cancer, Alzheimer's disease, infections of the kidney, and acute rheumatic fever and chronic rheumatic heart diseases were associated with the highest relative mortality risk for females. Using a systematic keyword search strategy, we identified 219 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-authored publications published between 2018 and 2023 featuring these conditions in a database of CDC-authored publications. For relevant publications on each condition, we evaluated five bibliometric indicators measuring media attention, academic citations, and policy citations. Overall, CDC's publications on these conditions did not demonstrate a gap in media attention, academic citations, and policy citations compared with other agency publications, underscoring the agency's effectiveness in disseminating its research on these topics. Assessing bibliometric indicators for published research on conditions with disproportionate relative mortality risk for females can reveal potential gaps in research coverage, highlight research successes, and inform strategic decisions for disseminating women's health research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251379401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251379401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解妇女健康研究对公共卫生的影响对于改善健康结果和指导未来的研究重点至关重要。文献计量分析提供了一套独特的工具,以确定增加影响和衡量妇女健康研究传播的机会。使用来自国家生命统计系统的2018-2021年死亡率数据,我们利用年龄调整死亡率来确定女性与男性相对死亡风险最高的疾病。我们的分析显示,乳腺癌、阿尔茨海默病、肾脏感染、急性风湿热和慢性风湿性心脏病与女性最高的相对死亡风险相关。使用系统的关键字搜索策略,我们在疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)撰写的出版物数据库中确定了2018年至2023年间发表的219篇疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)撰写的出版物,其中包括这些疾病。对于每种情况下的相关出版物,我们评估了五个文献计量指标,测量媒体关注度、学术引用和政策引用。总体而言,疾病预防控制中心关于这些情况的出版物与其他机构出版物相比,在媒体关注、学术引用和政策引用方面没有表现出差距,这突显了该机构在传播其关于这些主题的研究方面的有效性。评估关于女性相对死亡风险不成比例的条件的已发表研究的文献计量指标,可以揭示研究覆盖范围的潜在差距,突出研究成果,并为传播妇女健康研究的战略决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Reach and Impact of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Women's Health Research, 2018-2023.

Understanding the public health impact of women's health research is crucial for improving health outcomes and guiding future research priorities. Bibliometric analysis offers a unique suite of tools to identify opportunities to increase impact and measure the dissemination of women's health research. Using 2018-2021 mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System, we utilized age-adjusted death rates to identify conditions with the highest relative mortality risk for females versus males. Our analysis showed that breast cancer, Alzheimer's disease, infections of the kidney, and acute rheumatic fever and chronic rheumatic heart diseases were associated with the highest relative mortality risk for females. Using a systematic keyword search strategy, we identified 219 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-authored publications published between 2018 and 2023 featuring these conditions in a database of CDC-authored publications. For relevant publications on each condition, we evaluated five bibliometric indicators measuring media attention, academic citations, and policy citations. Overall, CDC's publications on these conditions did not demonstrate a gap in media attention, academic citations, and policy citations compared with other agency publications, underscoring the agency's effectiveness in disseminating its research on these topics. Assessing bibliometric indicators for published research on conditions with disproportionate relative mortality risk for females can reveal potential gaps in research coverage, highlight research successes, and inform strategic decisions for disseminating women's health research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信