使用改进的Robson分类系统评估2012-2019年安大略省剖宫产率:一项基于人群的研究

Sandra I Dunn, Yanfang Guo, Sheryll Dimanlig-Cruz, Malia S Q Murphy, Sara Carolina Scremin Souza, Ruth Rennicks White, Deshayne B Fell, Shi Wu Wen, Jun Zhang, Mark C Walker, Darine El-Chaâr
{"title":"使用改进的Robson分类系统评估2012-2019年安大略省剖宫产率:一项基于人群的研究","authors":"Sandra I Dunn, Yanfang Guo, Sheryll Dimanlig-Cruz, Malia S Q Murphy, Sara Carolina Scremin Souza, Ruth Rennicks White, Deshayne B Fell, Shi Wu Wen, Jun Zhang, Mark C Walker, Darine El-Chaâr","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe the trends in cesarean delivery (CD) rates in Ontario using the modified Robson classification system and identify the most common indications for CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN), a comprehensive maternal-child registry in Ontario. The analysis included all pregnant individuals who delivered a live or stillborn infant weighing ≥500 grams at ≥20 weeks' gestation between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 952 567 pregnant individuals gave birth in Ontario, Canada, during the study period. Our findings demonstrated a slight increase in the overall CD rate over seven fiscal years from 2012-2013 to 2018-2019. Robson Group 5 (term singleton cephalic pregnancy with previous CD), Groups 1 and 2 (nulliparous, term, singleton, cephalic pregnancy and no labour, induced labour, or spontaneous labour), and Group 6 (nulliparous pregnancy with breech presentation) made the largest contributions to the overall CD rate over the study period. The top five primary indications for CD across all years included previous CD, atypical or abnormal fetal surveillance, malposition/malpresentation, non-progressive first stage of labour and non-progressive second stage of labour.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results enhance our understanding of the key drivers of the CD rates. These findings will help to inform practice improvement, support policy change, and identify areas where future research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","volume":" ","pages":"103131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates across Ontario from 2012-2019 using the modified Robson classification system: a population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra I Dunn, Yanfang Guo, Sheryll Dimanlig-Cruz, Malia S Q Murphy, Sara Carolina Scremin Souza, Ruth Rennicks White, Deshayne B Fell, Shi Wu Wen, Jun Zhang, Mark C Walker, Darine El-Chaâr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe the trends in cesarean delivery (CD) rates in Ontario using the modified Robson classification system and identify the most common indications for CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN), a comprehensive maternal-child registry in Ontario. The analysis included all pregnant individuals who delivered a live or stillborn infant weighing ≥500 grams at ≥20 weeks' gestation between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 952 567 pregnant individuals gave birth in Ontario, Canada, during the study period. Our findings demonstrated a slight increase in the overall CD rate over seven fiscal years from 2012-2013 to 2018-2019. Robson Group 5 (term singleton cephalic pregnancy with previous CD), Groups 1 and 2 (nulliparous, term, singleton, cephalic pregnancy and no labour, induced labour, or spontaneous labour), and Group 6 (nulliparous pregnancy with breech presentation) made the largest contributions to the overall CD rate over the study period. The top five primary indications for CD across all years included previous CD, atypical or abnormal fetal surveillance, malposition/malpresentation, non-progressive first stage of labour and non-progressive second stage of labour.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results enhance our understanding of the key drivers of the CD rates. These findings will help to inform practice improvement, support policy change, and identify areas where future research is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在利用改进的Robson分类系统描述安大略省剖宫产率的趋势,并确定剖宫产最常见的适应症。方法:我们进行了一项基于人群的回顾性横断面研究,研究数据来自安大略省的一个综合母婴登记处——更好的结局登记处和网络(BORN)。该分析包括2012年4月1日至2019年3月31日期间妊娠≥20周分娩体重≥500克活产或死产婴儿的所有孕妇。结果:在研究期间,加拿大安大略省共有952 567名孕妇分娩。我们的研究结果表明,从2012-2013年到2018-2019年的七个财政年度,总体CD率略有上升。Robson组5(足月单胎头位妊娠,既往有乳糜泻)、组1和组2(无产、足月、单胎、头位妊娠,无分娩、引产或自然分娩)和组6(无产妊娠,臀位分娩)在研究期间对总乳糜泻率贡献最大。在所有年份中,乳糜泻的前五大主要指征包括既往乳糜泻、非典型或异常胎儿监测、体位/表现不当、第一产程非进行性和第二产程非进行性。结论:研究结果加深了我们对慢性阻塞性肺病发病率的主要影响因素的认识。这些发现将有助于为实践改进提供信息,支持政策变化,并确定未来需要研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates across Ontario from 2012-2019 using the modified Robson classification system: a population-based study.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the trends in cesarean delivery (CD) rates in Ontario using the modified Robson classification system and identify the most common indications for CD.

Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN), a comprehensive maternal-child registry in Ontario. The analysis included all pregnant individuals who delivered a live or stillborn infant weighing ≥500 grams at ≥20 weeks' gestation between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2019.

Results: A total of 952 567 pregnant individuals gave birth in Ontario, Canada, during the study period. Our findings demonstrated a slight increase in the overall CD rate over seven fiscal years from 2012-2013 to 2018-2019. Robson Group 5 (term singleton cephalic pregnancy with previous CD), Groups 1 and 2 (nulliparous, term, singleton, cephalic pregnancy and no labour, induced labour, or spontaneous labour), and Group 6 (nulliparous pregnancy with breech presentation) made the largest contributions to the overall CD rate over the study period. The top five primary indications for CD across all years included previous CD, atypical or abnormal fetal surveillance, malposition/malpresentation, non-progressive first stage of labour and non-progressive second stage of labour.

Conclusion: The results enhance our understanding of the key drivers of the CD rates. These findings will help to inform practice improvement, support policy change, and identify areas where future research is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信