零保费医疗保险优势计划:社会经济脆弱性和健康需求地区的趋势。

IF 2.7
Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf177
Changchuan Jiang, Lesi He, Chuan Angel Lu, Arthur S Hong, Xin Hu, Joseph H Joo, Ryan D Nipp, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, K Robin Yabroff, Joshua M Liao
{"title":"零保费医疗保险优势计划:社会经济脆弱性和健康需求地区的趋势。","authors":"Changchuan Jiang, Lesi He, Chuan Angel Lu, Arthur S Hong, Xin Hu, Joseph H Joo, Ryan D Nipp, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, K Robin Yabroff, Joshua M Liao","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Zero-premium Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are increasingly popular, yet knowledge gaps exist regarding their distribution, enrollment, and quality, particularly in areas with greater socioeconomic vulnerability and clinical need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a serial cross-sectional study of publicly available CMS data from 2019-2024, analyzing 2472 US counties. Annual plan counts and enrollment rates were examined, stratified by county-level socioeconomic and health characteristics (racial/ethnic minority percentage, poverty rate, and prevalence of fair/poor health). Counties were categorized into quartiles for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zero-premium MA plans expanded substantially from 2019-2024, rising from 46.02% of MA plans (9.12 million enrollees) to 66.3% (18.76 million). These plans were more likely to feature restrictive provider networks and showed disproportionate enrollment growth in counties with greater socioeconomic and health needs (higher proportions of racial/ethnic minority residents, poverty, and poor health status; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Across all county-characteristic subgroups, zero-premium plans consistently had lower star ratings (1-3.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid zero-premium MA plan adoption raises concerns about the quality of care, especially among vulnerable populations. Further examination of plan quality standards and patient outcomes, transparency of enrollment incentives (eg, insurance broker commissions), and enrollee navigation and decision-making about plan options is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zero-premium Medicare Advantage plans: trends in areas with socioeconomic vulnerability and health needs.\",\"authors\":\"Changchuan Jiang, Lesi He, Chuan Angel Lu, Arthur S Hong, Xin Hu, Joseph H Joo, Ryan D Nipp, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, K Robin Yabroff, Joshua M Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxaf177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Zero-premium Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are increasingly popular, yet knowledge gaps exist regarding their distribution, enrollment, and quality, particularly in areas with greater socioeconomic vulnerability and clinical need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a serial cross-sectional study of publicly available CMS data from 2019-2024, analyzing 2472 US counties. Annual plan counts and enrollment rates were examined, stratified by county-level socioeconomic and health characteristics (racial/ethnic minority percentage, poverty rate, and prevalence of fair/poor health). Counties were categorized into quartiles for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zero-premium MA plans expanded substantially from 2019-2024, rising from 46.02% of MA plans (9.12 million enrollees) to 66.3% (18.76 million). These plans were more likely to feature restrictive provider networks and showed disproportionate enrollment growth in counties with greater socioeconomic and health needs (higher proportions of racial/ethnic minority residents, poverty, and poor health status; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Across all county-characteristic subgroups, zero-premium plans consistently had lower star ratings (1-3.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid zero-premium MA plan adoption raises concerns about the quality of care, especially among vulnerable populations. Further examination of plan quality standards and patient outcomes, transparency of enrollment incentives (eg, insurance broker commissions), and enrollee navigation and decision-making about plan options is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 9\",\"pages\":\"qxaf177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:零保费医疗保险优势(MA)计划越来越受欢迎,但在其分布、登记和质量方面存在知识差距,特别是在社会经济脆弱性和临床需求较大的地区。方法:我们对2019-2024年公开可用的CMS数据进行了一系列横断面研究,分析了2472个美国县。对年度计划计数和入学率进行了检查,并根据县级社会经济和健康特征(种族/少数民族百分比、贫困率和健康状况一般/较差的患病率)进行了分层。各县被分成四分位数进行比较。结果:零保费MA计划从2019-2024年大幅扩张,从MA计划的46.02%(912万注册者)上升到66.3%(1876万)。这些计划更有可能具有限制性提供者网络,并且在社会经济和健康需求较大的县显示不成比例的入学率增长(种族/少数民族居民比例较高,贫困和健康状况不佳;P < 0.001)。在所有具有县特色的亚组中,零保费计划的星级评级一直较低(1-3.5)。结论:快速采用零保费MA计划引起了对护理质量的担忧,特别是在弱势群体中。有必要进一步检查计划质量标准和患者结果,登记激励机制(如保险经纪人佣金)的透明度,以及登记人对计划选择的导航和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Zero-premium Medicare Advantage plans: trends in areas with socioeconomic vulnerability and health needs.

Zero-premium Medicare Advantage plans: trends in areas with socioeconomic vulnerability and health needs.

Zero-premium Medicare Advantage plans: trends in areas with socioeconomic vulnerability and health needs.

Zero-premium Medicare Advantage plans: trends in areas with socioeconomic vulnerability and health needs.

Introduction: Zero-premium Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are increasingly popular, yet knowledge gaps exist regarding their distribution, enrollment, and quality, particularly in areas with greater socioeconomic vulnerability and clinical need.

Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional study of publicly available CMS data from 2019-2024, analyzing 2472 US counties. Annual plan counts and enrollment rates were examined, stratified by county-level socioeconomic and health characteristics (racial/ethnic minority percentage, poverty rate, and prevalence of fair/poor health). Counties were categorized into quartiles for comparison.

Results: Zero-premium MA plans expanded substantially from 2019-2024, rising from 46.02% of MA plans (9.12 million enrollees) to 66.3% (18.76 million). These plans were more likely to feature restrictive provider networks and showed disproportionate enrollment growth in counties with greater socioeconomic and health needs (higher proportions of racial/ethnic minority residents, poverty, and poor health status; P < 0.001). Across all county-characteristic subgroups, zero-premium plans consistently had lower star ratings (1-3.5).

Conclusion: Rapid zero-premium MA plan adoption raises concerns about the quality of care, especially among vulnerable populations. Further examination of plan quality standards and patient outcomes, transparency of enrollment incentives (eg, insurance broker commissions), and enrollee navigation and decision-making about plan options is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信