{"title":"完善“分娩友好医院”称号。","authors":"Amanda Bonheur, Kortney Floyd James, Megan Andrew","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"Birthing-Friendly\" designation, intended to guide birthing individuals toward quality hospitals, has become widespread. However, our analysis of hospital data finds that the Birthing-Friendly designation does not differentiate hospitals based on meaningful quality measures. Our analysis shows that while Birthing-Friendly hospitals are larger and engage in quality improvement efforts, they do not consistently outperform non-designated hospitals on core maternal health metrics such as early elective delivery rates or births-to-staff ratios. The designation likely reflects a hospital's capacity to adopt basic quality improvement programming structures more than its ability to provide consistent, high-quality maternal care. To address this, we propose a more robust measure that includes clinical outcomes, patient experiences, and equity metrics, particularly for marginalized groups like Black and Indigenous birthing people.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the \\\"Birthing-Friendly\\\" hospital designation better.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Bonheur, Kortney Floyd James, Megan Andrew\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxaf170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The \\\"Birthing-Friendly\\\" designation, intended to guide birthing individuals toward quality hospitals, has become widespread. However, our analysis of hospital data finds that the Birthing-Friendly designation does not differentiate hospitals based on meaningful quality measures. Our analysis shows that while Birthing-Friendly hospitals are larger and engage in quality improvement efforts, they do not consistently outperform non-designated hospitals on core maternal health metrics such as early elective delivery rates or births-to-staff ratios. The designation likely reflects a hospital's capacity to adopt basic quality improvement programming structures more than its ability to provide consistent, high-quality maternal care. To address this, we propose a more robust measure that includes clinical outcomes, patient experiences, and equity metrics, particularly for marginalized groups like Black and Indigenous birthing people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 9\",\"pages\":\"qxaf170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Making the "Birthing-Friendly" hospital designation better.
The "Birthing-Friendly" designation, intended to guide birthing individuals toward quality hospitals, has become widespread. However, our analysis of hospital data finds that the Birthing-Friendly designation does not differentiate hospitals based on meaningful quality measures. Our analysis shows that while Birthing-Friendly hospitals are larger and engage in quality improvement efforts, they do not consistently outperform non-designated hospitals on core maternal health metrics such as early elective delivery rates or births-to-staff ratios. The designation likely reflects a hospital's capacity to adopt basic quality improvement programming structures more than its ability to provide consistent, high-quality maternal care. To address this, we propose a more robust measure that includes clinical outcomes, patient experiences, and equity metrics, particularly for marginalized groups like Black and Indigenous birthing people.