完善“分娩友好医院”称号。

IF 2.7
Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf170
Amanda Bonheur, Kortney Floyd James, Megan Andrew
{"title":"完善“分娩友好医院”称号。","authors":"Amanda Bonheur, Kortney Floyd James, Megan Andrew","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"Birthing-Friendly\" designation, intended to guide birthing individuals toward quality hospitals, has become widespread. However, our analysis of hospital data finds that the Birthing-Friendly designation does not differentiate hospitals based on meaningful quality measures. Our analysis shows that while Birthing-Friendly hospitals are larger and engage in quality improvement efforts, they do not consistently outperform non-designated hospitals on core maternal health metrics such as early elective delivery rates or births-to-staff ratios. The designation likely reflects a hospital's capacity to adopt basic quality improvement programming structures more than its ability to provide consistent, high-quality maternal care. To address this, we propose a more robust measure that includes clinical outcomes, patient experiences, and equity metrics, particularly for marginalized groups like Black and Indigenous birthing people.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the \\\"Birthing-Friendly\\\" hospital designation better.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Bonheur, Kortney Floyd James, Megan Andrew\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxaf170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The \\\"Birthing-Friendly\\\" designation, intended to guide birthing individuals toward quality hospitals, has become widespread. However, our analysis of hospital data finds that the Birthing-Friendly designation does not differentiate hospitals based on meaningful quality measures. Our analysis shows that while Birthing-Friendly hospitals are larger and engage in quality improvement efforts, they do not consistently outperform non-designated hospitals on core maternal health metrics such as early elective delivery rates or births-to-staff ratios. The designation likely reflects a hospital's capacity to adopt basic quality improvement programming structures more than its ability to provide consistent, high-quality maternal care. To address this, we propose a more robust measure that includes clinical outcomes, patient experiences, and equity metrics, particularly for marginalized groups like Black and Indigenous birthing people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 9\",\"pages\":\"qxaf170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“分娩友好”的称号,旨在引导分娩个人到优质医院,已经变得普遍。然而,我们对医院数据的分析发现,分娩友好称号并没有根据有意义的质量措施区分医院。我们的分析表明,虽然分娩友好医院规模较大,并致力于提高质量,但它们在核心孕产妇健康指标(如早期选择性分娩率或分娩与医务人员比率)上的表现并不总是优于非指定医院。这一称号可能反映的是医院采用基本质量改进方案结构的能力,而不是其提供一致的高质量产妇保健的能力。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个更有力的衡量标准,包括临床结果、患者体验和公平指标,特别是针对黑人和土著生育人群等边缘化群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Making the "Birthing-Friendly" hospital designation better.

Making the "Birthing-Friendly" hospital designation better.

Making the "Birthing-Friendly" hospital designation better.

Making the "Birthing-Friendly" hospital designation better.

The "Birthing-Friendly" designation, intended to guide birthing individuals toward quality hospitals, has become widespread. However, our analysis of hospital data finds that the Birthing-Friendly designation does not differentiate hospitals based on meaningful quality measures. Our analysis shows that while Birthing-Friendly hospitals are larger and engage in quality improvement efforts, they do not consistently outperform non-designated hospitals on core maternal health metrics such as early elective delivery rates or births-to-staff ratios. The designation likely reflects a hospital's capacity to adopt basic quality improvement programming structures more than its ability to provide consistent, high-quality maternal care. To address this, we propose a more robust measure that includes clinical outcomes, patient experiences, and equity metrics, particularly for marginalized groups like Black and Indigenous birthing people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信