系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病的治疗:系统综述和网络荟萃分析

IF 1.1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Siyao Wu, Wanling Xu, Zhen Bei, Junpei Wu, Mingchun Zhang
{"title":"系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病的治疗:系统综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Siyao Wu, Wanling Xu, Zhen Bei, Junpei Wu, Mingchun Zhang","doi":"10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.25013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background/Aims: Several clinical studies have shown favorable outcomes in treating systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), yet head-to-head comparisons regarding the efficacy and safety of these pharmacological therapies remain limited. Materials and Methods: A systematical search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pharmacological treatments for SScILD.A comprehensive systematic search was performed across Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify RCTs that evaluated pharmacological interventions for SSc-ILD, specifically cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, nintedanib, pirfenidone, tocilizumab, and rituximab. The effects of various treatments versus placebo on changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated by a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Pooled estimates, including mean difference and risk ratios with 95% CIs, were calculated to compare different therapies. The surface under the cumulative ranking probability (SUCRA) was then used to rank these therapeutic agents. Results: Tocilizumab had the highest SUCRA probability (90.4%) in slowing the deterioration of FVC. Rituximab showed the highest SUCRA probability (84.2%) in the prevention of DLCO. Moreover, rituximab showed the lowest probability (59.1%) for SAEs. Conclusion: Tocilizumab and rituximab may be the optimal interventions. Still, further direct head-to-head trials are necessary to substantiate these conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93884,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":"40 3","pages":"395-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Siyao Wu, Wanling Xu, Zhen Bei, Junpei Wu, Mingchun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.25013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background/Aims: Several clinical studies have shown favorable outcomes in treating systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), yet head-to-head comparisons regarding the efficacy and safety of these pharmacological therapies remain limited. Materials and Methods: A systematical search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pharmacological treatments for SScILD.A comprehensive systematic search was performed across Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify RCTs that evaluated pharmacological interventions for SSc-ILD, specifically cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, nintedanib, pirfenidone, tocilizumab, and rituximab. The effects of various treatments versus placebo on changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated by a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Pooled estimates, including mean difference and risk ratios with 95% CIs, were calculated to compare different therapies. The surface under the cumulative ranking probability (SUCRA) was then used to rank these therapeutic agents. Results: Tocilizumab had the highest SUCRA probability (90.4%) in slowing the deterioration of FVC. Rituximab showed the highest SUCRA probability (84.2%) in the prevention of DLCO. Moreover, rituximab showed the lowest probability (59.1%) for SAEs. Conclusion: Tocilizumab and rituximab may be the optimal interventions. Still, further direct head-to-head trials are necessary to substantiate these conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"395-406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.25013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.25013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:一些临床研究已经显示出治疗系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病(SSc-ILD)的良好结果,但这些药物治疗的疗效和安全性的正面比较仍然有限。材料和方法:对SScILD药物治疗的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统检索。在Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed和Web of Science中进行了全面的系统检索,以确定评估SSc-ILD药物干预措施的随机对照试验,特别是环磷酰胺、霉酚酸酯、尼达尼布、吡非尼酮、托珠单抗和利妥昔单抗。通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析评估各种治疗与安慰剂对用力肺活量(FVC)、肺一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)和严重不良事件(SAEs)变化的影响。计算汇总估计,包括95% ci的平均差异和风险比,以比较不同的治疗方法。然后使用累积排序概率(SUCRA)下的表面对这些治疗剂进行排序。结果:托珠单抗在延缓FVC恶化方面具有最高的SUCRA概率(90.4%)。利妥昔单抗预防DLCO的SUCRA概率最高(84.2%)。此外,利妥昔单抗发生SAEs的概率最低(59.1%)。结论:托珠单抗和利妥昔单抗可能是最佳干预措施。不过,还需要进一步的直接面对面试验来证实这些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Background/Aims: Several clinical studies have shown favorable outcomes in treating systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), yet head-to-head comparisons regarding the efficacy and safety of these pharmacological therapies remain limited. Materials and Methods: A systematical search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pharmacological treatments for SScILD.A comprehensive systematic search was performed across Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science to identify RCTs that evaluated pharmacological interventions for SSc-ILD, specifically cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, nintedanib, pirfenidone, tocilizumab, and rituximab. The effects of various treatments versus placebo on changes in forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated by a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Pooled estimates, including mean difference and risk ratios with 95% CIs, were calculated to compare different therapies. The surface under the cumulative ranking probability (SUCRA) was then used to rank these therapeutic agents. Results: Tocilizumab had the highest SUCRA probability (90.4%) in slowing the deterioration of FVC. Rituximab showed the highest SUCRA probability (84.2%) in the prevention of DLCO. Moreover, rituximab showed the lowest probability (59.1%) for SAEs. Conclusion: Tocilizumab and rituximab may be the optimal interventions. Still, further direct head-to-head trials are necessary to substantiate these conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信