{"title":"近期住院后诊断为心力衰竭并射血分数降低的门诊人群中苏比里尔/缬沙坦的处方模式","authors":"Dimitri Roustan, Hugo Bothorel, Omar Kherad","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia6030055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to international guidelines. However, achieving the target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains a challenge in clinical practice and its efficacy at suboptimal dose (<200 mg/day) versus angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors remains debated. Our objective was to evaluate the titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge in patients with HFrEF. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary care hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients hospitalized between 2020 and 2022 with HFrEF, discharged with Sacubitril/Valsartan, were included. Physicians managing patients discharged with a Sacubitril/Valsartan dose of less than 200 mg/day were contacted and asked to complete a structured 7-item questionnaire regarding dose adjustments within the first 3 months following hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not achieve GDMT doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan, along with reasons for inadequate titration. <b>Results</b>: Overall, 30 patients out of 79 (38%, 95% confidence interval [27-49%]) had not been titrated to an effective dose of Sacubitril/Valsartan 3 months after hospitalization. Of these thirty patients, the primary reason for not titrating cited by their practitioners (<i>n</i> = 27) was that titration was perceived to be within the cardiologist's scope of responsibility (15/27, 56%). While most physicians (66%) knew the target doses for Sacubitril/Valsartan, 83% of them were unaware that the clinical benefit of sacubitril/valsartan at doses below 50% of the target compared to ACE inhibitors remains uncertain and is not well supported by current evidence. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this cohort, more than a third of patients with HFrEF were not titrated to guideline-recommended target doses of sacubitril/valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge. This finding raises questions about the clinical and economic value of initiating sacubitril/valsartan without subsequent dose optimization, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of suboptimal dosing compared to ACE inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription Patterns of Sacubitril/Valsartan in an Outpatient Population Diagnosed with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After a Recent Hospitalization.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitri Roustan, Hugo Bothorel, Omar Kherad\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/epidemiologia6030055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to international guidelines. However, achieving the target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains a challenge in clinical practice and its efficacy at suboptimal dose (<200 mg/day) versus angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors remains debated. Our objective was to evaluate the titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge in patients with HFrEF. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary care hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients hospitalized between 2020 and 2022 with HFrEF, discharged with Sacubitril/Valsartan, were included. Physicians managing patients discharged with a Sacubitril/Valsartan dose of less than 200 mg/day were contacted and asked to complete a structured 7-item questionnaire regarding dose adjustments within the first 3 months following hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not achieve GDMT doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan, along with reasons for inadequate titration. <b>Results</b>: Overall, 30 patients out of 79 (38%, 95% confidence interval [27-49%]) had not been titrated to an effective dose of Sacubitril/Valsartan 3 months after hospitalization. Of these thirty patients, the primary reason for not titrating cited by their practitioners (<i>n</i> = 27) was that titration was perceived to be within the cardiologist's scope of responsibility (15/27, 56%). While most physicians (66%) knew the target doses for Sacubitril/Valsartan, 83% of them were unaware that the clinical benefit of sacubitril/valsartan at doses below 50% of the target compared to ACE inhibitors remains uncertain and is not well supported by current evidence. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this cohort, more than a third of patients with HFrEF were not titrated to guideline-recommended target doses of sacubitril/valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge. This finding raises questions about the clinical and economic value of initiating sacubitril/valsartan without subsequent dose optimization, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of suboptimal dosing compared to ACE inhibitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6030055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6030055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prescription Patterns of Sacubitril/Valsartan in an Outpatient Population Diagnosed with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After a Recent Hospitalization.
Background: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to international guidelines. However, achieving the target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains a challenge in clinical practice and its efficacy at suboptimal dose (<200 mg/day) versus angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors remains debated. Our objective was to evaluate the titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge in patients with HFrEF. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary care hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients hospitalized between 2020 and 2022 with HFrEF, discharged with Sacubitril/Valsartan, were included. Physicians managing patients discharged with a Sacubitril/Valsartan dose of less than 200 mg/day were contacted and asked to complete a structured 7-item questionnaire regarding dose adjustments within the first 3 months following hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not achieve GDMT doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan, along with reasons for inadequate titration. Results: Overall, 30 patients out of 79 (38%, 95% confidence interval [27-49%]) had not been titrated to an effective dose of Sacubitril/Valsartan 3 months after hospitalization. Of these thirty patients, the primary reason for not titrating cited by their practitioners (n = 27) was that titration was perceived to be within the cardiologist's scope of responsibility (15/27, 56%). While most physicians (66%) knew the target doses for Sacubitril/Valsartan, 83% of them were unaware that the clinical benefit of sacubitril/valsartan at doses below 50% of the target compared to ACE inhibitors remains uncertain and is not well supported by current evidence. Conclusions: In this cohort, more than a third of patients with HFrEF were not titrated to guideline-recommended target doses of sacubitril/valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge. This finding raises questions about the clinical and economic value of initiating sacubitril/valsartan without subsequent dose optimization, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of suboptimal dosing compared to ACE inhibitors.