近期住院后诊断为心力衰竭并射血分数降低的门诊人群中苏比里尔/缬沙坦的处方模式

IF 2.2
Dimitri Roustan, Hugo Bothorel, Omar Kherad
{"title":"近期住院后诊断为心力衰竭并射血分数降低的门诊人群中苏比里尔/缬沙坦的处方模式","authors":"Dimitri Roustan, Hugo Bothorel, Omar Kherad","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia6030055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to international guidelines. However, achieving the target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains a challenge in clinical practice and its efficacy at suboptimal dose (<200 mg/day) versus angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors remains debated. Our objective was to evaluate the titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge in patients with HFrEF. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary care hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients hospitalized between 2020 and 2022 with HFrEF, discharged with Sacubitril/Valsartan, were included. Physicians managing patients discharged with a Sacubitril/Valsartan dose of less than 200 mg/day were contacted and asked to complete a structured 7-item questionnaire regarding dose adjustments within the first 3 months following hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not achieve GDMT doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan, along with reasons for inadequate titration. <b>Results</b>: Overall, 30 patients out of 79 (38%, 95% confidence interval [27-49%]) had not been titrated to an effective dose of Sacubitril/Valsartan 3 months after hospitalization. Of these thirty patients, the primary reason for not titrating cited by their practitioners (<i>n</i> = 27) was that titration was perceived to be within the cardiologist's scope of responsibility (15/27, 56%). While most physicians (66%) knew the target doses for Sacubitril/Valsartan, 83% of them were unaware that the clinical benefit of sacubitril/valsartan at doses below 50% of the target compared to ACE inhibitors remains uncertain and is not well supported by current evidence. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this cohort, more than a third of patients with HFrEF were not titrated to guideline-recommended target doses of sacubitril/valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge. This finding raises questions about the clinical and economic value of initiating sacubitril/valsartan without subsequent dose optimization, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of suboptimal dosing compared to ACE inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription Patterns of Sacubitril/Valsartan in an Outpatient Population Diagnosed with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After a Recent Hospitalization.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitri Roustan, Hugo Bothorel, Omar Kherad\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/epidemiologia6030055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to international guidelines. However, achieving the target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains a challenge in clinical practice and its efficacy at suboptimal dose (<200 mg/day) versus angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors remains debated. Our objective was to evaluate the titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge in patients with HFrEF. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary care hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients hospitalized between 2020 and 2022 with HFrEF, discharged with Sacubitril/Valsartan, were included. Physicians managing patients discharged with a Sacubitril/Valsartan dose of less than 200 mg/day were contacted and asked to complete a structured 7-item questionnaire regarding dose adjustments within the first 3 months following hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not achieve GDMT doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan, along with reasons for inadequate titration. <b>Results</b>: Overall, 30 patients out of 79 (38%, 95% confidence interval [27-49%]) had not been titrated to an effective dose of Sacubitril/Valsartan 3 months after hospitalization. Of these thirty patients, the primary reason for not titrating cited by their practitioners (<i>n</i> = 27) was that titration was perceived to be within the cardiologist's scope of responsibility (15/27, 56%). While most physicians (66%) knew the target doses for Sacubitril/Valsartan, 83% of them were unaware that the clinical benefit of sacubitril/valsartan at doses below 50% of the target compared to ACE inhibitors remains uncertain and is not well supported by current evidence. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this cohort, more than a third of patients with HFrEF were not titrated to guideline-recommended target doses of sacubitril/valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge. This finding raises questions about the clinical and economic value of initiating sacubitril/valsartan without subsequent dose optimization, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of suboptimal dosing compared to ACE inhibitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6030055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6030055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据国际指南,Sacubitril/缬沙坦是治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的一线药物。然而,在临床实践中,实现指南导向药物治疗(GDMT)的目标剂量仍然是一个挑战,其在次优剂量下的疗效(方法:在瑞士日内瓦的一家二级护理医院进行了一项横断面研究。纳入了2020年至2022年期间因HFrEF住院,出院时使用Sacubitril/缬沙坦的患者。联系了管理沙克比里尔/缬沙坦剂量低于200 mg/天出院患者的医生,并要求他们在出院后的前3个月内完成一份关于剂量调整的结构化7项问卷。主要结局是未达到GDMT剂量的Sacubitril/缬沙坦患者的比例,以及滴定不足的原因。结果:总体而言,79例患者中有30例(38%,95%可信区间[27-49%])在住院后3个月未滴定到有效剂量的Sacubitril/缬沙坦。在这30名患者中,他们的医生(n = 27)引用的不滴定的主要原因是认为滴定在心脏病专家的责任范围内(15/ 27,56 %)。虽然大多数医生(66%)知道Sacubitril/缬沙坦的目标剂量,但83%的医生不知道与ACE抑制剂相比,Sacubitril/缬沙坦在低于目标剂量50%时的临床获益仍然不确定,并且目前没有很好的证据支持。结论:在这个队列中,超过三分之一的HFrEF患者在出院后3个月内没有滴定到指南推荐的目标剂量的苏比里尔/缬沙坦。这一发现提出了关于在没有后续剂量优化的情况下开始使用苏比里尔/缬沙坦的临床和经济价值的问题,特别是考虑到与ACE抑制剂相比,次优剂量的疗效存在不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescription Patterns of Sacubitril/Valsartan in an Outpatient Population Diagnosed with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After a Recent Hospitalization.

Background: Sacubitril/Valsartan is a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to international guidelines. However, achieving the target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains a challenge in clinical practice and its efficacy at suboptimal dose (<200 mg/day) versus angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors remains debated. Our objective was to evaluate the titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge in patients with HFrEF. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary care hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients hospitalized between 2020 and 2022 with HFrEF, discharged with Sacubitril/Valsartan, were included. Physicians managing patients discharged with a Sacubitril/Valsartan dose of less than 200 mg/day were contacted and asked to complete a structured 7-item questionnaire regarding dose adjustments within the first 3 months following hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not achieve GDMT doses of Sacubitril/Valsartan, along with reasons for inadequate titration. Results: Overall, 30 patients out of 79 (38%, 95% confidence interval [27-49%]) had not been titrated to an effective dose of Sacubitril/Valsartan 3 months after hospitalization. Of these thirty patients, the primary reason for not titrating cited by their practitioners (n = 27) was that titration was perceived to be within the cardiologist's scope of responsibility (15/27, 56%). While most physicians (66%) knew the target doses for Sacubitril/Valsartan, 83% of them were unaware that the clinical benefit of sacubitril/valsartan at doses below 50% of the target compared to ACE inhibitors remains uncertain and is not well supported by current evidence. Conclusions: In this cohort, more than a third of patients with HFrEF were not titrated to guideline-recommended target doses of sacubitril/valsartan within 3 months of hospital discharge. This finding raises questions about the clinical and economic value of initiating sacubitril/valsartan without subsequent dose optimization, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of suboptimal dosing compared to ACE inhibitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信