评估接受外侧髁骨折手术复位和固定的儿童患者术后活动范围。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Gabrielle Rogie, Timothy Borden, Lindsay Crawford, Surya Mundluru, Brennan Roper, Rohini Mahajan Vanodia, Shiraz Younas
{"title":"评估接受外侧髁骨折手术复位和固定的儿童患者术后活动范围。","authors":"Gabrielle Rogie, Timothy Borden, Lindsay Crawford, Surya Mundluru, Brennan Roper, Rohini Mahajan Vanodia, Shiraz Younas","doi":"10.1177/18632521251368279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various methods of fixation for pediatric lateral condyle fractures. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the three treatment groups and time of return to the full range of motion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>There were three fixation groups-Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen (AO) cannulated screws (<i>n</i> = 11), buried Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 13), and unburied Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 36). Variables evaluated were time to return to full range of motion of the elbow, whether therapy was required, average number of follow-up visits, fracture classification (Milch), time to operating room, duration of immobilization, degree of initial fracture displacement, time to radiographic healing, complications, and if manipulation under anesthesia was done, whether this was planned or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average return to full range of motion for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins were 113, 82.7, and 94 days, respectively. A one-way ANOVA revealed a <i>p</i>-value of 0.11711. <i>p</i>-Values were also insignificant for the average number of follow-up visits, time to operating room, and time of immobilization. The <i>p</i>-value for time to radiographic healing was <0.00001, with times for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins being 75, 35, and 34.9 days, respectively. Notably, the Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screw group averaged 9 years old, more than twice the Steinmann pin groups' 4 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from this sample suggest that there is no difference in return to full range of motion when comparing the three fixation methods. There was a difference in time to radiographic healing with Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screws taking the longest, potentially due to age differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":56060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"18632521251368279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of postoperative range of motion in pediatric patients undergoing surgical reduction and fixation of lateral condyle fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Rogie, Timothy Borden, Lindsay Crawford, Surya Mundluru, Brennan Roper, Rohini Mahajan Vanodia, Shiraz Younas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18632521251368279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various methods of fixation for pediatric lateral condyle fractures. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the three treatment groups and time of return to the full range of motion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>There were three fixation groups-Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen (AO) cannulated screws (<i>n</i> = 11), buried Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 13), and unburied Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 36). Variables evaluated were time to return to full range of motion of the elbow, whether therapy was required, average number of follow-up visits, fracture classification (Milch), time to operating room, duration of immobilization, degree of initial fracture displacement, time to radiographic healing, complications, and if manipulation under anesthesia was done, whether this was planned or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average return to full range of motion for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins were 113, 82.7, and 94 days, respectively. A one-way ANOVA revealed a <i>p</i>-value of 0.11711. <i>p</i>-Values were also insignificant for the average number of follow-up visits, time to operating room, and time of immobilization. The <i>p</i>-value for time to radiographic healing was <0.00001, with times for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins being 75, 35, and 34.9 days, respectively. Notably, the Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screw group averaged 9 years old, more than twice the Steinmann pin groups' 4 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from this sample suggest that there is no difference in return to full range of motion when comparing the three fixation methods. There was a difference in time to radiographic healing with Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screws taking the longest, potentially due to age differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18632521251368279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251368279\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251368279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估小儿外侧髁骨折的各种固定方法的效果。原假设是,三个治疗组之间和恢复全活动范围的时间没有差异。方法:采用algemeinshaft骨合成原(AO)空心螺钉(n = 11)、埋置Steinmann销(n = 13)和非埋置Steinmann销(n = 36) 3组固定。评估的变量包括肘关节恢复完全活动的时间、是否需要治疗、平均随访次数、骨折分类(Milch)、到手术室的时间、固定时间、初始骨折移位程度、影像学愈合时间、并发症,以及是否在麻醉下进行操作,是否计划进行操作。结果:采用骨合成根空心螺钉、埋置Steinmann销和未埋置Steinmann销对Algemeinshaft进行全活动的平均恢复时间分别为113、82.7和94天。单因素方差分析显示p值为0.11711。平均随访次数、到手术室时间和固定时间的p值也不显著。结论:该样本的数据表明,在比较三种固定方法时,在恢复全活动范围方面没有差异。使用Algemeinshaft进行骨合成螺钉放射治疗所需时间最长,这可能是由于年龄的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of postoperative range of motion in pediatric patients undergoing surgical reduction and fixation of lateral condyle fractures.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various methods of fixation for pediatric lateral condyle fractures. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the three treatment groups and time of return to the full range of motion.

Method: There were three fixation groups-Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen (AO) cannulated screws (n = 11), buried Steinmann pins (n = 13), and unburied Steinmann pins (n = 36). Variables evaluated were time to return to full range of motion of the elbow, whether therapy was required, average number of follow-up visits, fracture classification (Milch), time to operating room, duration of immobilization, degree of initial fracture displacement, time to radiographic healing, complications, and if manipulation under anesthesia was done, whether this was planned or not.

Results: Average return to full range of motion for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins were 113, 82.7, and 94 days, respectively. A one-way ANOVA revealed a p-value of 0.11711. p-Values were also insignificant for the average number of follow-up visits, time to operating room, and time of immobilization. The p-value for time to radiographic healing was <0.00001, with times for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins being 75, 35, and 34.9 days, respectively. Notably, the Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screw group averaged 9 years old, more than twice the Steinmann pin groups' 4 years.

Conclusion: Data from this sample suggest that there is no difference in return to full range of motion when comparing the three fixation methods. There was a difference in time to radiographic healing with Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screws taking the longest, potentially due to age differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics
Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope The Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics is the official journal of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and is published by The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. It provides a forum for the advancement of the knowledge and education in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology across geographical borders. It advocates an increased worldwide involvement in preventing and treating musculoskeletal diseases in children and adolescents. The journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles that focus on clinical practice, diagnosis and treatment of disorders unique to paediatric orthopaedics, as well as on basic and applied research. It aims to help physicians stay abreast of the latest and ever-changing developments in the field of paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal welcomes original contributions submitted exclusively for review to the journal. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will publish one print issue each year to coincide with the EPOS Annual Congress, featuring the meeting’s abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信