{"title":"评估接受外侧髁骨折手术复位和固定的儿童患者术后活动范围。","authors":"Gabrielle Rogie, Timothy Borden, Lindsay Crawford, Surya Mundluru, Brennan Roper, Rohini Mahajan Vanodia, Shiraz Younas","doi":"10.1177/18632521251368279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various methods of fixation for pediatric lateral condyle fractures. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the three treatment groups and time of return to the full range of motion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>There were three fixation groups-Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen (AO) cannulated screws (<i>n</i> = 11), buried Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 13), and unburied Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 36). Variables evaluated were time to return to full range of motion of the elbow, whether therapy was required, average number of follow-up visits, fracture classification (Milch), time to operating room, duration of immobilization, degree of initial fracture displacement, time to radiographic healing, complications, and if manipulation under anesthesia was done, whether this was planned or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average return to full range of motion for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins were 113, 82.7, and 94 days, respectively. A one-way ANOVA revealed a <i>p</i>-value of 0.11711. <i>p</i>-Values were also insignificant for the average number of follow-up visits, time to operating room, and time of immobilization. The <i>p</i>-value for time to radiographic healing was <0.00001, with times for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins being 75, 35, and 34.9 days, respectively. Notably, the Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screw group averaged 9 years old, more than twice the Steinmann pin groups' 4 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from this sample suggest that there is no difference in return to full range of motion when comparing the three fixation methods. There was a difference in time to radiographic healing with Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screws taking the longest, potentially due to age differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":56060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"18632521251368279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of postoperative range of motion in pediatric patients undergoing surgical reduction and fixation of lateral condyle fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Rogie, Timothy Borden, Lindsay Crawford, Surya Mundluru, Brennan Roper, Rohini Mahajan Vanodia, Shiraz Younas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18632521251368279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various methods of fixation for pediatric lateral condyle fractures. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the three treatment groups and time of return to the full range of motion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>There were three fixation groups-Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen (AO) cannulated screws (<i>n</i> = 11), buried Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 13), and unburied Steinmann pins (<i>n</i> = 36). Variables evaluated were time to return to full range of motion of the elbow, whether therapy was required, average number of follow-up visits, fracture classification (Milch), time to operating room, duration of immobilization, degree of initial fracture displacement, time to radiographic healing, complications, and if manipulation under anesthesia was done, whether this was planned or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average return to full range of motion for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins were 113, 82.7, and 94 days, respectively. A one-way ANOVA revealed a <i>p</i>-value of 0.11711. <i>p</i>-Values were also insignificant for the average number of follow-up visits, time to operating room, and time of immobilization. The <i>p</i>-value for time to radiographic healing was <0.00001, with times for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins being 75, 35, and 34.9 days, respectively. Notably, the Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screw group averaged 9 years old, more than twice the Steinmann pin groups' 4 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from this sample suggest that there is no difference in return to full range of motion when comparing the three fixation methods. There was a difference in time to radiographic healing with Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screws taking the longest, potentially due to age differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18632521251368279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251368279\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251368279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of postoperative range of motion in pediatric patients undergoing surgical reduction and fixation of lateral condyle fractures.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various methods of fixation for pediatric lateral condyle fractures. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the three treatment groups and time of return to the full range of motion.
Method: There were three fixation groups-Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen (AO) cannulated screws (n = 11), buried Steinmann pins (n = 13), and unburied Steinmann pins (n = 36). Variables evaluated were time to return to full range of motion of the elbow, whether therapy was required, average number of follow-up visits, fracture classification (Milch), time to operating room, duration of immobilization, degree of initial fracture displacement, time to radiographic healing, complications, and if manipulation under anesthesia was done, whether this was planned or not.
Results: Average return to full range of motion for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins were 113, 82.7, and 94 days, respectively. A one-way ANOVA revealed a p-value of 0.11711. p-Values were also insignificant for the average number of follow-up visits, time to operating room, and time of immobilization. The p-value for time to radiographic healing was <0.00001, with times for Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen cannulated screw, buried Steinmann pins, and unburied Steinmann pins being 75, 35, and 34.9 days, respectively. Notably, the Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screw group averaged 9 years old, more than twice the Steinmann pin groups' 4 years.
Conclusion: Data from this sample suggest that there is no difference in return to full range of motion when comparing the three fixation methods. There was a difference in time to radiographic healing with Algemeinshaft fur osteosynthesegragen screws taking the longest, potentially due to age differences.
期刊介绍:
Aims & Scope
The Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics is the official journal of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and is published by The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
It provides a forum for the advancement of the knowledge and education in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology across geographical borders. It advocates an increased worldwide involvement in preventing and treating musculoskeletal diseases in children and adolescents.
The journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles that focus on clinical practice, diagnosis and treatment of disorders unique to paediatric orthopaedics, as well as on basic and applied research. It aims to help physicians stay abreast of the latest and ever-changing developments in the field of paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology.
The journal welcomes original contributions submitted exclusively for review to the journal. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will publish one print issue each year to coincide with the EPOS Annual Congress, featuring the meeting’s abstracts.