纤维肌痛的疼痛致敏和下行疼痛抑制。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ailyn Garcia-Hernandez, Pablo de la Coba, Stephen Bruehl, Stefan Duschek, Gustavo A Reyes Del Paso
{"title":"纤维肌痛的疼痛致敏和下行疼痛抑制。","authors":"Ailyn Garcia-Hernandez, Pablo de la Coba, Stephen Bruehl, Stefan Duschek, Gustavo A Reyes Del Paso","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both facilitation of ascending nociceptive pathways and impaired inhibition of descending ones may contribute to pain sensitization in fibromyalgia (FM). The slowly repeated evoked pain (SREP) protocol is a potential diagnostic marker for this sensitization. Though its mechanisms are unclear, SREP appears linked to ascending facilitation, while the role of descending inhibitory dysfunction in SREP sensitization remains to be clarified.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify descending pain inhibition in FM compared to healthy individuals and to assess its relationship with pain sensitization via SREP. Additionally, associations between descending pain inhibition and clinical symptoms were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 55 women with FM and 45 healthy women, descending pain inhibition was estimated using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, with interdigital web pinching as the conditioning stimulus. The use of SREP protocol consisted of applying pressure stimuli to the nail of the third finger of the non-dominant hand. Clinical symptoms were assessed using questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SREP sensitization was stronger and CPM smaller in FM patients than in healthy women. In FM patients, SREP sensitization was inversely associated with CPM, and both related to clinical symptoms. Patients who did not show CPM reported greater severity of FM symptoms and higher anxiety and fatigue levels than those who showed CPM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impaired endogenous pain inhibition contributes to pain sensitization in FM and may partly explain SREP sensitization. This reduced pain inhibition could also underlie the clinical symptoms commonly seen in FM. Future research may clarify altered balance between ascending and descending pain processes in FM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Sensitization and Descending Pain Inhibition in Fibromyalgia.\",\"authors\":\"Ailyn Garcia-Hernandez, Pablo de la Coba, Stephen Bruehl, Stefan Duschek, Gustavo A Reyes Del Paso\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both facilitation of ascending nociceptive pathways and impaired inhibition of descending ones may contribute to pain sensitization in fibromyalgia (FM). The slowly repeated evoked pain (SREP) protocol is a potential diagnostic marker for this sensitization. Though its mechanisms are unclear, SREP appears linked to ascending facilitation, while the role of descending inhibitory dysfunction in SREP sensitization remains to be clarified.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify descending pain inhibition in FM compared to healthy individuals and to assess its relationship with pain sensitization via SREP. Additionally, associations between descending pain inhibition and clinical symptoms were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 55 women with FM and 45 healthy women, descending pain inhibition was estimated using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, with interdigital web pinching as the conditioning stimulus. The use of SREP protocol consisted of applying pressure stimuli to the nail of the third finger of the non-dominant hand. Clinical symptoms were assessed using questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SREP sensitization was stronger and CPM smaller in FM patients than in healthy women. In FM patients, SREP sensitization was inversely associated with CPM, and both related to clinical symptoms. Patients who did not show CPM reported greater severity of FM symptoms and higher anxiety and fatigue levels than those who showed CPM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impaired endogenous pain inhibition contributes to pain sensitization in FM and may partly explain SREP sensitization. This reduced pain inhibition could also underlie the clinical symptoms commonly seen in FM. Future research may clarify altered balance between ascending and descending pain processes in FM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:上行痛觉通路的促进和下行痛觉通路的抑制受损都可能导致纤维肌痛(FM)的疼痛致敏。缓慢重复诱发疼痛(SREP)方案是这种致敏性的潜在诊断标志。尽管其机制尚不清楚,但SREP似乎与上行促进有关,而下行抑制功能障碍在SREP致敏中的作用仍有待阐明。目的:量化FM患者与健康个体的疼痛下降抑制,并通过SREP评估其与疼痛致敏的关系。此外,还研究了下行疼痛抑制与临床症状之间的关系。方法:采用条件疼痛调节(CPM)模式,以手指间捏网为条件刺激,对55名FM女性和45名健康女性进行下行疼痛抑制评估。使用SREP方案包括对非优势手的第三指指甲施加压力刺激。临床症状通过问卷评估。结果:与健康女性相比,FM患者的SREP致敏更强,CPM更小。在FM患者中,SREP致敏与CPM呈负相关,且两者均与临床症状相关。未表现出CPM的患者比表现出CPM的患者报告更严重的FM症状和更高的焦虑和疲劳水平。结论:内源性疼痛抑制受损有助于FM的疼痛致敏,并可能部分解释SREP致敏。这种疼痛抑制的减弱也可能是FM中常见的临床症状的基础。未来的研究可能会澄清FM中上升和下降疼痛过程之间平衡的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain Sensitization and Descending Pain Inhibition in Fibromyalgia.

Background: Both facilitation of ascending nociceptive pathways and impaired inhibition of descending ones may contribute to pain sensitization in fibromyalgia (FM). The slowly repeated evoked pain (SREP) protocol is a potential diagnostic marker for this sensitization. Though its mechanisms are unclear, SREP appears linked to ascending facilitation, while the role of descending inhibitory dysfunction in SREP sensitization remains to be clarified.

Objective: To quantify descending pain inhibition in FM compared to healthy individuals and to assess its relationship with pain sensitization via SREP. Additionally, associations between descending pain inhibition and clinical symptoms were examined.

Methods: In 55 women with FM and 45 healthy women, descending pain inhibition was estimated using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, with interdigital web pinching as the conditioning stimulus. The use of SREP protocol consisted of applying pressure stimuli to the nail of the third finger of the non-dominant hand. Clinical symptoms were assessed using questionnaires.

Results: SREP sensitization was stronger and CPM smaller in FM patients than in healthy women. In FM patients, SREP sensitization was inversely associated with CPM, and both related to clinical symptoms. Patients who did not show CPM reported greater severity of FM symptoms and higher anxiety and fatigue levels than those who showed CPM.

Conclusions: Impaired endogenous pain inhibition contributes to pain sensitization in FM and may partly explain SREP sensitization. This reduced pain inhibition could also underlie the clinical symptoms commonly seen in FM. Future research may clarify altered balance between ascending and descending pain processes in FM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信