[对欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)关于传导系统起搏适应症的临床共识声明的评论]。

Q4 Medicine
Carsten W Israel
{"title":"[对欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)关于传导系统起搏适应症的临床共识声明的评论]。","authors":"Carsten W Israel","doi":"10.1007/s00399-025-01106-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) updates expert opinions on conduction system pacing (CSP). It does not represent a focused update of the ESC pacemaker guidelines of 2021 since that would require the publication of new results of randomized trials. But an official statement became necessary because at the time of preparing the ESC guidelines on pacing and cardiac resynchronization, only very limited data on left bundle branch pacing were available rendering this form of pacing almost completely ignored in the recommendations. Second, daily implantation practice has changed substantially worldwide since the advent of CSP. Third, basically all international heart rhythm societies apart from the ESC have published new guidelines on the use CSP in 2023 which differ significantly from the European recommendations. The Clinical Consensus Statement on CSP of the ESC differs from the 2021 ESC guidelines only in nuances since ESC statutes do not allow that an ESC expert opinion paper substantially contradict current ESC guidelines. However, it is important for daily practice that CSP be recommended as a potential alternative to right ventricular pacing in patients with good left ventricular function or rare ventricular pacing is expected. Similarly, CSP is recommended as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BiVP) in reduced left ventricular function, in context with ablation of the atrioventricular node, in heart failure with wide QRS complex and for upgrading in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Finally, CSP is recommended in nonresponders to BiVP.</p>","PeriodicalId":52403,"journal":{"name":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comment on the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Consensus Statement on the indication for conduction system pacing].\",\"authors\":\"Carsten W Israel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00399-025-01106-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) updates expert opinions on conduction system pacing (CSP). It does not represent a focused update of the ESC pacemaker guidelines of 2021 since that would require the publication of new results of randomized trials. But an official statement became necessary because at the time of preparing the ESC guidelines on pacing and cardiac resynchronization, only very limited data on left bundle branch pacing were available rendering this form of pacing almost completely ignored in the recommendations. Second, daily implantation practice has changed substantially worldwide since the advent of CSP. Third, basically all international heart rhythm societies apart from the ESC have published new guidelines on the use CSP in 2023 which differ significantly from the European recommendations. The Clinical Consensus Statement on CSP of the ESC differs from the 2021 ESC guidelines only in nuances since ESC statutes do not allow that an ESC expert opinion paper substantially contradict current ESC guidelines. However, it is important for daily practice that CSP be recommended as a potential alternative to right ventricular pacing in patients with good left ventricular function or rare ventricular pacing is expected. Similarly, CSP is recommended as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BiVP) in reduced left ventricular function, in context with ablation of the atrioventricular node, in heart failure with wide QRS complex and for upgrading in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Finally, CSP is recommended in nonresponders to BiVP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-025-01106-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-025-01106-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)的临床共识声明更新了传导系统起搏(CSP)的专家意见。它并不代表2021年ESC起搏器指南的重点更新,因为这需要发表随机试验的新结果。但是官方声明是必要的,因为在准备ESC关于起搏和心脏再同步的指南时,只有非常有限的关于左束支起搏的数据,使得这种起搏形式在建议中几乎完全被忽略。其次,自CSP出现以来,全球范围内的日常植入实践发生了重大变化。第三,除了ESC之外,基本上所有国际心律学会都在2023年发布了关于使用CSP的新指南,这与欧洲的建议有很大不同。关于ESC CSP的临床共识声明与2021年ESC指南仅在细微差别上有所不同,因为ESC法规不允许ESC专家意见文件与当前ESC指南存在实质性矛盾。然而,在日常实践中,推荐CSP作为左心室功能良好或罕见心室起搏的患者右心室起搏的潜在替代方案是很重要的。同样,在左心室功能减退、房室结消融、伴有宽QRS复合物的心力衰竭和起搏性心肌病升级时,CSP被推荐作为双室起搏(BiVP)的替代方案。最后,推荐对BiVP无反应的患者使用CSP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comment on the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Consensus Statement on the indication for conduction system pacing].

The Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) updates expert opinions on conduction system pacing (CSP). It does not represent a focused update of the ESC pacemaker guidelines of 2021 since that would require the publication of new results of randomized trials. But an official statement became necessary because at the time of preparing the ESC guidelines on pacing and cardiac resynchronization, only very limited data on left bundle branch pacing were available rendering this form of pacing almost completely ignored in the recommendations. Second, daily implantation practice has changed substantially worldwide since the advent of CSP. Third, basically all international heart rhythm societies apart from the ESC have published new guidelines on the use CSP in 2023 which differ significantly from the European recommendations. The Clinical Consensus Statement on CSP of the ESC differs from the 2021 ESC guidelines only in nuances since ESC statutes do not allow that an ESC expert opinion paper substantially contradict current ESC guidelines. However, it is important for daily practice that CSP be recommended as a potential alternative to right ventricular pacing in patients with good left ventricular function or rare ventricular pacing is expected. Similarly, CSP is recommended as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BiVP) in reduced left ventricular function, in context with ablation of the atrioventricular node, in heart failure with wide QRS complex and for upgrading in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Finally, CSP is recommended in nonresponders to BiVP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie
Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Mit wissenschaftlichen Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten, Berichten über moderne Operationstechniken und experimentelle Methoden ist die Zeitschrift Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie ein Diskussionsforum für Themen wie: - Zelluläre Elektrophysiologie - Theoretische Elektrophysiologie - Klinische Elektrophysiologie - Angewandte Herzschrittmachertherapie - Bradykarde und tachykarde Herzrhythmusstörungen - Plötzlicher Herztod und Risikostratifikation - Elektrokardiographie - Elektromedizinische Technologie - Experimentelle und klinische Pharmakologie - Herzchirurgie bei Herzrhythmusstörungen Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgruppen Herzschrittmacher und Arrhythmie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie - Herz und Kreislaufforschung e.V. (DGK) sowie Stellungnahmen und praktische Hinweise runden das breite Spektrum dieser Zeitschrift ab. Interessensgebiete: Kardiologie, Herzschrittmachertherapie, Herzschrittmachertechnologie, klinische Elektrophysiologie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信