Sasikala D Amirthalingam, Malanashita Ganeson, Chandramani Thuraisingham, Verna K M Lee, Chun Wai Chan, Lokman H Sulaiman, Sivarajan Ramasamy, Mohamad A Bujang, Cheong Lieng Teng
{"title":"探讨成人2型糖尿病患者健康知识、健康素养、自我保健、自我效能感与血糖控制的关系","authors":"Sasikala D Amirthalingam, Malanashita Ganeson, Chandramani Thuraisingham, Verna K M Lee, Chun Wai Chan, Lokman H Sulaiman, Sivarajan Ramasamy, Mohamad A Bujang, Cheong Lieng Teng","doi":"10.4239/wjd.v16.i9.105138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Malaysia continue to have substantial comorbidities and struggle to achieve glycemic targets.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To comprehensively evaluate diabetes self-care and glycemic control using multiple self-reporting questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults diagnosed with T2DM attending the Seremban Health Clinic were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Eligible participants were recruited based on a consecutive sampling technique, first-come-first-served-basis if they fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition to the usual sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data, the participants answered seven specific self-reporting questionnaires. This report was focused on six key variables: Glycemic control; self-care; self-efficacy; diabetes knowledge; health literacy; and medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 adults with T2DM participated. The proportions of participants achieving specific thresholds in the key variables were: Acceptable glycemic control 39.4%; adequate diabetes knowledge 59.6%; sufficient or higher health literacy 80.2%; and medication adherence 51.0%. The mean self-efficacy score was 110.6 (73.3% of maximum), and the mean self-care score was 30.7 (43.9% of maximum). A statistically significant linear correlation was observed for eight pairs of key variables with Pearson's correlation values varying between 0.21 to 0.55. Self-efficacy had a relatively higher correlation while glycated hemoglobin was not correlated with other key variables. Path analysis was conducted to examine the relationships among diabetes self-efficacy (Diabetes Management Self Efficacy scale score), self-care behavior (Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities score), and glycemic control, but the model demonstrated a poor fit (<i>χ</i>² = 28.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found substantial suboptimal glycemic control and low self-care practices but acceptable levels of diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy and medication adherence among the patients with T2DM. In spite of the correlations between self-care, self-efficacy, and medication adherence, it was surprising that self-care did not correlate with glycemic control. Prospective cohort studies are needed to explore whether these factors influence diabetes outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48607,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Diabetes","volume":"16 9","pages":"105138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationship between health knowledge, health literacy, self-care, self-efficacy, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Sasikala D Amirthalingam, Malanashita Ganeson, Chandramani Thuraisingham, Verna K M Lee, Chun Wai Chan, Lokman H Sulaiman, Sivarajan Ramasamy, Mohamad A Bujang, Cheong Lieng Teng\",\"doi\":\"10.4239/wjd.v16.i9.105138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Malaysia continue to have substantial comorbidities and struggle to achieve glycemic targets.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To comprehensively evaluate diabetes self-care and glycemic control using multiple self-reporting questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults diagnosed with T2DM attending the Seremban Health Clinic were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Eligible participants were recruited based on a consecutive sampling technique, first-come-first-served-basis if they fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition to the usual sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data, the participants answered seven specific self-reporting questionnaires. This report was focused on six key variables: Glycemic control; self-care; self-efficacy; diabetes knowledge; health literacy; and medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 adults with T2DM participated. The proportions of participants achieving specific thresholds in the key variables were: Acceptable glycemic control 39.4%; adequate diabetes knowledge 59.6%; sufficient or higher health literacy 80.2%; and medication adherence 51.0%. The mean self-efficacy score was 110.6 (73.3% of maximum), and the mean self-care score was 30.7 (43.9% of maximum). A statistically significant linear correlation was observed for eight pairs of key variables with Pearson's correlation values varying between 0.21 to 0.55. Self-efficacy had a relatively higher correlation while glycated hemoglobin was not correlated with other key variables. Path analysis was conducted to examine the relationships among diabetes self-efficacy (Diabetes Management Self Efficacy scale score), self-care behavior (Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities score), and glycemic control, but the model demonstrated a poor fit (<i>χ</i>² = 28.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found substantial suboptimal glycemic control and low self-care practices but acceptable levels of diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy and medication adherence among the patients with T2DM. In spite of the correlations between self-care, self-efficacy, and medication adherence, it was surprising that self-care did not correlate with glycemic control. Prospective cohort studies are needed to explore whether these factors influence diabetes outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"105138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i9.105138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i9.105138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在马来西亚,成人2型糖尿病(T2DM)仍然有大量的合并症,并且难以达到血糖目标。目的:采用多份自我报告问卷对糖尿病患者的自我护理和血糖控制进行综合评价。方法:在这项横断面研究中招募了在Seremban健康诊所就诊的诊断为2型糖尿病的成年人。如果符合纳入和排除标准,则根据连续抽样技术,先到先得的原则招募符合条件的参与者。除了通常的社会人口学、临床和实验室数据外,参与者还回答了七份具体的自我报告问卷。本报告主要关注六个关键变量:血糖控制;自理;自我效能感;糖尿病知识;健康知识;还有药物依从性。结果:共有100名成年T2DM患者参与。在关键变量中达到特定阈值的参与者比例为:可接受血糖控制39.4%;糖尿病知识充足(59.6%);有足够或更高的卫生素养80.2%;药物依从性为51.0%。平均自我效能得分为110.6分(占总分的73.3%),平均自我照顾得分为30.7分(占总分的43.9%)。8对关键变量的Pearson相关值在0.21 ~ 0.55之间,存在统计学上显著的线性相关。自我效能感与其他关键变量相关性较高,糖化血红蛋白与其他关键变量相关性不高。通过通径分析检验糖尿病自我效能感(糖尿病管理自我效能量表得分)、自我护理行为(糖尿病自我护理活动总结得分)与血糖控制之间的关系,但模型拟合不佳(χ 2 = 28.1, P < 0.001)。结论:我们发现T2DM患者的血糖控制处于次优状态,自我保健行为较低,但糖尿病知识、自我效能、健康素养和药物依从性水平可接受。尽管自我保健、自我效能和药物依从性之间存在相关性,但令人惊讶的是,自我保健与血糖控制没有相关性。需要前瞻性队列研究来探索这些因素是否影响糖尿病结局。
Exploring the relationship between health knowledge, health literacy, self-care, self-efficacy, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Background: Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Malaysia continue to have substantial comorbidities and struggle to achieve glycemic targets.
Aim: To comprehensively evaluate diabetes self-care and glycemic control using multiple self-reporting questionnaires.
Methods: Adults diagnosed with T2DM attending the Seremban Health Clinic were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Eligible participants were recruited based on a consecutive sampling technique, first-come-first-served-basis if they fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition to the usual sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data, the participants answered seven specific self-reporting questionnaires. This report was focused on six key variables: Glycemic control; self-care; self-efficacy; diabetes knowledge; health literacy; and medication adherence.
Results: A total of 100 adults with T2DM participated. The proportions of participants achieving specific thresholds in the key variables were: Acceptable glycemic control 39.4%; adequate diabetes knowledge 59.6%; sufficient or higher health literacy 80.2%; and medication adherence 51.0%. The mean self-efficacy score was 110.6 (73.3% of maximum), and the mean self-care score was 30.7 (43.9% of maximum). A statistically significant linear correlation was observed for eight pairs of key variables with Pearson's correlation values varying between 0.21 to 0.55. Self-efficacy had a relatively higher correlation while glycated hemoglobin was not correlated with other key variables. Path analysis was conducted to examine the relationships among diabetes self-efficacy (Diabetes Management Self Efficacy scale score), self-care behavior (Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities score), and glycemic control, but the model demonstrated a poor fit (χ² = 28.1, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: We found substantial suboptimal glycemic control and low self-care practices but acceptable levels of diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy, health literacy and medication adherence among the patients with T2DM. In spite of the correlations between self-care, self-efficacy, and medication adherence, it was surprising that self-care did not correlate with glycemic control. Prospective cohort studies are needed to explore whether these factors influence diabetes outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The WJD is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJD is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of diabetes. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJD is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJD are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in diabetes. Scope: Diabetes Complications, Experimental Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Cardiomyopathies, Diabetic Coma, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Neuropathies, Donohue Syndrome, Fetal Macrosomia, and Prediabetic State.