标准与橡胶/纱布/甘布敷料用于下肢游离皮瓣重建的比较分析。

IF 1.3 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Pooja Jageer, John Kiely, Stephanie Day, Chris West, Waseem Bhat
{"title":"标准与橡胶/纱布/甘布敷料用于下肢游离皮瓣重建的比较分析。","authors":"Pooja Jageer, John Kiely, Stephanie Day, Chris West, Waseem Bhat","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower limb free flaps require regular monitoring in the immediate days postoperatively and often involve prolonged outpatient wound care. Post-operative dressings are complicated when a circular external fixator is used. Circumferential post-operative dressings are the standard option, such as Jelonet/gauze/wool/crepe. An alternative option is the use of Jelonet and gauze, with Gamgee (JGG) wrapped loosely over the frame instead. This allows easier monitoring with complete flap visualisation, avoids constriction and allows much quicker dressing application. This dressing option has been previously described, but no comparative study between standard dressings and JGG dressings has been made. A retrospective study was conducted for consecutive patients treated with a circular frame and free flap for reconstruction of either an acute open tibial fracture or fracture-related infection between January 2022 and October 2023. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative details, flap and wound healing outcomes were recorded and analysed using Jamovi 2.3.21. Thirty-one patients (average age 43 years) were identified, 81% open fracture, 42% gracilis, 36% ALT. A total of 48% had standard dressings, and 52% JGG. No statistically significant difference was found between the dressing groups for flap failure, inpatient stay, or time to complete healing. This study demonstrates clinical equivalence in outcomes between standard and JGG dressings for this patient group. The JGG dressing also has the advantages of quick and easy application, with improved flap visualisation. We recommend its use in this patient group.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Jageer P, Kiely J, Day S, <i>et al</i>. A Comparative Analysis of Standard vs Jelonet/Gauze/Gamgee Dressing for Lower Limb Free Flap Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):56-58.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"20 1","pages":"56-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Standard vs Jelonet/Gauze/Gamgee Dressing for Lower Limb Free Flap Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Jageer, John Kiely, Stephanie Day, Chris West, Waseem Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lower limb free flaps require regular monitoring in the immediate days postoperatively and often involve prolonged outpatient wound care. Post-operative dressings are complicated when a circular external fixator is used. Circumferential post-operative dressings are the standard option, such as Jelonet/gauze/wool/crepe. An alternative option is the use of Jelonet and gauze, with Gamgee (JGG) wrapped loosely over the frame instead. This allows easier monitoring with complete flap visualisation, avoids constriction and allows much quicker dressing application. This dressing option has been previously described, but no comparative study between standard dressings and JGG dressings has been made. A retrospective study was conducted for consecutive patients treated with a circular frame and free flap for reconstruction of either an acute open tibial fracture or fracture-related infection between January 2022 and October 2023. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative details, flap and wound healing outcomes were recorded and analysed using Jamovi 2.3.21. Thirty-one patients (average age 43 years) were identified, 81% open fracture, 42% gracilis, 36% ALT. A total of 48% had standard dressings, and 52% JGG. No statistically significant difference was found between the dressing groups for flap failure, inpatient stay, or time to complete healing. This study demonstrates clinical equivalence in outcomes between standard and JGG dressings for this patient group. The JGG dressing also has the advantages of quick and easy application, with improved flap visualisation. We recommend its use in this patient group.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Jageer P, Kiely J, Day S, <i>et al</i>. A Comparative Analysis of Standard vs Jelonet/Gauze/Gamgee Dressing for Lower Limb Free Flap Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):56-58.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"56-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下肢游离皮瓣术后需要定期监测,经常需要长期门诊伤口护理。当使用圆形外固定架时,术后敷料是复杂的。环状术后敷料是标准的选择,如jeonet /纱布/羊毛/绉。另一种选择是使用橡胶网和纱布,用松松地包裹在框架上。这使得更容易监测与完整的皮瓣可视化,避免收缩,并允许更快的敷料应用。这种敷料选项以前已经描述过,但没有标准敷料和JGG敷料之间的比较研究。对2022年1月至2023年10月期间连续接受圆形框架和游离皮瓣重建急性开放性胫骨骨折或骨折相关感染的患者进行了回顾性研究。使用Jamovi 2.3.21软件记录患者的人口统计学、合并症、围手术期细节、皮瓣和伤口愈合情况并进行分析。31例患者(平均年龄43岁),81%为开放性骨折,42%为股薄肌,36%为ALT。总共48%为标准敷料,52%为JGG。在皮瓣失败、住院时间或完全愈合时间方面,敷料组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。本研究证明了标准敷料和JGG敷料在该患者组的临床结果等效。JGG敷料也有快速和容易应用的优点,与改进皮瓣可视化。我们推荐在这个病人组中使用它。如何引用本文:Jageer P, Kiely J, Day S等。标准与橡胶/纱布/甘布敷料用于下肢游离皮瓣重建的比较分析。创伤肢体重建[j]; 2015;20(1):56-58。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comparative Analysis of Standard vs Jelonet/Gauze/Gamgee Dressing for Lower Limb Free Flap Reconstruction.

A Comparative Analysis of Standard vs Jelonet/Gauze/Gamgee Dressing for Lower Limb Free Flap Reconstruction.

Lower limb free flaps require regular monitoring in the immediate days postoperatively and often involve prolonged outpatient wound care. Post-operative dressings are complicated when a circular external fixator is used. Circumferential post-operative dressings are the standard option, such as Jelonet/gauze/wool/crepe. An alternative option is the use of Jelonet and gauze, with Gamgee (JGG) wrapped loosely over the frame instead. This allows easier monitoring with complete flap visualisation, avoids constriction and allows much quicker dressing application. This dressing option has been previously described, but no comparative study between standard dressings and JGG dressings has been made. A retrospective study was conducted for consecutive patients treated with a circular frame and free flap for reconstruction of either an acute open tibial fracture or fracture-related infection between January 2022 and October 2023. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative details, flap and wound healing outcomes were recorded and analysed using Jamovi 2.3.21. Thirty-one patients (average age 43 years) were identified, 81% open fracture, 42% gracilis, 36% ALT. A total of 48% had standard dressings, and 52% JGG. No statistically significant difference was found between the dressing groups for flap failure, inpatient stay, or time to complete healing. This study demonstrates clinical equivalence in outcomes between standard and JGG dressings for this patient group. The JGG dressing also has the advantages of quick and easy application, with improved flap visualisation. We recommend its use in this patient group.

How to cite this article: Jageer P, Kiely J, Day S, et al. A Comparative Analysis of Standard vs Jelonet/Gauze/Gamgee Dressing for Lower Limb Free Flap Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):56-58.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信