Ara Faraj, Felix Hammett, Beth Lineham, Elizabeth Barron, Yvonne Hadland, Elizabeth Moulder, Ross Muir, Hemant Sharma
{"title":"急性踝关节牵引治疗胫骨远端和皮隆关节内骨折的疗效。","authors":"Ara Faraj, Felix Hammett, Beth Lineham, Elizabeth Barron, Yvonne Hadland, Elizabeth Moulder, Ross Muir, Hemant Sharma","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>Intra-articular distal tibia fractures can lead to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Joint distraction has shown promise in elective cases of osteoarthritis (OA) by temporarily offloading joint forces and potentially facilitating cartilage regeneration. However, its application in acute fractures remains unexplored. This pilot study aims to investigate the benefits of joint distraction in acute fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study comprising consecutive patients with intra-articular distal tibia and pilon fractures, treated with a circular ring fixator (CRF) and ankle distraction as part of their fracture management, was undertaken at a single centre.Prospective data collection included radiological assessments, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), complications, necessity for additional procedures, and the Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KL) for OA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 137 patients included in the study, among them 30 in the distraction group and 107 in the non-distraction group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, distribution of open or closed fractures, diabetic status, and smoking status between the groups. Mean follow-up was 3.73 years.There was no significant difference between the distraction and non-distraction groups in overall complications or need for further procedures. The mean radiological follow-up was 1.90 years, there was no significant difference in progression of KL between the groups (1.81 vs 2.0, <i>p</i> = 0.38). There were 32 patients who had radiological follow-up exceeding 2 years (average 3.52 years); here there was no significant difference between these groups (mean change 2.18 vs 2.4, <i>p</i> = 0.87).Patient-reported outcome measures data was available for 44 patients (6 in the distraction group, 38 in the non-distraction group) with a mean follow-up of 1.71 years. There were no significant differences in EQ5D and C Olerud-H Molander scores between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ankle joint distraction in the management of acute ankle fractures did not influence outcomes for patients in short and medium term follow-up. Future work should investigate for long-term effects of this auxiliary technique when using circular external fixators, in particular on the development of PTOA.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Faraj A, Hammett F, Lineham B, <i>et al</i>. Outcomes of Acute Ankle Distraction for Intra-articular Distal Tibial and Pilon Fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):6-10.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"20 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Acute Ankle Distraction for Intra-articular Distal Tibial and Pilon Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Ara Faraj, Felix Hammett, Beth Lineham, Elizabeth Barron, Yvonne Hadland, Elizabeth Moulder, Ross Muir, Hemant Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>Intra-articular distal tibia fractures can lead to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Joint distraction has shown promise in elective cases of osteoarthritis (OA) by temporarily offloading joint forces and potentially facilitating cartilage regeneration. However, its application in acute fractures remains unexplored. This pilot study aims to investigate the benefits of joint distraction in acute fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study comprising consecutive patients with intra-articular distal tibia and pilon fractures, treated with a circular ring fixator (CRF) and ankle distraction as part of their fracture management, was undertaken at a single centre.Prospective data collection included radiological assessments, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), complications, necessity for additional procedures, and the Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KL) for OA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 137 patients included in the study, among them 30 in the distraction group and 107 in the non-distraction group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, distribution of open or closed fractures, diabetic status, and smoking status between the groups. Mean follow-up was 3.73 years.There was no significant difference between the distraction and non-distraction groups in overall complications or need for further procedures. The mean radiological follow-up was 1.90 years, there was no significant difference in progression of KL between the groups (1.81 vs 2.0, <i>p</i> = 0.38). There were 32 patients who had radiological follow-up exceeding 2 years (average 3.52 years); here there was no significant difference between these groups (mean change 2.18 vs 2.4, <i>p</i> = 0.87).Patient-reported outcome measures data was available for 44 patients (6 in the distraction group, 38 in the non-distraction group) with a mean follow-up of 1.71 years. There were no significant differences in EQ5D and C Olerud-H Molander scores between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ankle joint distraction in the management of acute ankle fractures did not influence outcomes for patients in short and medium term follow-up. Future work should investigate for long-term effects of this auxiliary technique when using circular external fixators, in particular on the development of PTOA.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Faraj A, Hammett F, Lineham B, <i>et al</i>. Outcomes of Acute Ankle Distraction for Intra-articular Distal Tibial and Pilon Fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):6-10.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445135/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的和背景:胫骨远端关节内骨折可导致创伤后骨关节炎(pta)。关节牵张术在骨关节炎(OA)的选择性病例中显示出了希望,它可以暂时减轻关节受力,并可能促进软骨再生。然而,其在急性骨折中的应用仍未探索。本初步研究旨在探讨关节牵引治疗急性骨折的益处。材料和方法:在单一中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该研究包括连续的胫骨远端关节内骨折和pilon骨折患者,采用环形固定器(CRF)和踝关节牵引治疗,作为骨折治疗的一部分。前瞻性数据收集包括放射学评估、患者报告的结果测量(PROM)、并发症、额外手术的必要性以及骨性关节炎的Kellgren和Lawrence分级(KL)。结果:共纳入137例患者,其中分心组30例,非分心组107例。两组患者在年龄、性别、开放性或闭合性骨折分布、糖尿病状况、吸烟状况等方面均无显著差异。平均随访3.73年。牵张组和非牵张组在总体并发症或需要进一步手术方面没有显著差异。平均放射随访时间为1.90年,两组间KL进展无显著差异(1.81 vs 2.0, p = 0.38)。随访时间超过2年的32例(平均3.52年);两组间无显著差异(平均变化2.18 vs 2.4, p = 0.87)。44例患者报告的结果测量数据(分心组6例,非分心组38例),平均随访时间为1.71年。两组间EQ5D和C - Olerud-H Molander评分无显著差异。结论:踝关节牵引治疗急性踝关节骨折对患者的中短期随访无影响。未来的工作应该研究这种辅助技术在使用圆形外固定架时的长期影响,特别是对上睑下垂的发展。本文引用方式:Faraj A, Hammett F, Lineham B,等。急性踝关节牵引治疗胫骨远端和皮隆关节内骨折的疗效。创伤肢体重建2025;20(1):6-10。
Outcomes of Acute Ankle Distraction for Intra-articular Distal Tibial and Pilon Fractures.
Aims and background: Intra-articular distal tibia fractures can lead to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Joint distraction has shown promise in elective cases of osteoarthritis (OA) by temporarily offloading joint forces and potentially facilitating cartilage regeneration. However, its application in acute fractures remains unexplored. This pilot study aims to investigate the benefits of joint distraction in acute fractures.
Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study comprising consecutive patients with intra-articular distal tibia and pilon fractures, treated with a circular ring fixator (CRF) and ankle distraction as part of their fracture management, was undertaken at a single centre.Prospective data collection included radiological assessments, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), complications, necessity for additional procedures, and the Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KL) for OA.
Results: There were 137 patients included in the study, among them 30 in the distraction group and 107 in the non-distraction group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, distribution of open or closed fractures, diabetic status, and smoking status between the groups. Mean follow-up was 3.73 years.There was no significant difference between the distraction and non-distraction groups in overall complications or need for further procedures. The mean radiological follow-up was 1.90 years, there was no significant difference in progression of KL between the groups (1.81 vs 2.0, p = 0.38). There were 32 patients who had radiological follow-up exceeding 2 years (average 3.52 years); here there was no significant difference between these groups (mean change 2.18 vs 2.4, p = 0.87).Patient-reported outcome measures data was available for 44 patients (6 in the distraction group, 38 in the non-distraction group) with a mean follow-up of 1.71 years. There were no significant differences in EQ5D and C Olerud-H Molander scores between the two groups.
Conclusion: Ankle joint distraction in the management of acute ankle fractures did not influence outcomes for patients in short and medium term follow-up. Future work should investigate for long-term effects of this auxiliary technique when using circular external fixators, in particular on the development of PTOA.
How to cite this article: Faraj A, Hammett F, Lineham B, et al. Outcomes of Acute Ankle Distraction for Intra-articular Distal Tibial and Pilon Fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):6-10.
期刊介绍:
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.