尿路感染中抗生素耐药性的快速直接纸片扩散试验:一种细菌浓度调整方法。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Henning Sabersky-Müssigbrodt, Seoras Russell, Nina Wantia, Oliver Hayden
{"title":"尿路感染中抗生素耐药性的快速直接纸片扩散试验:一种细菌浓度调整方法。","authors":"Henning Sabersky-Müssigbrodt, Seoras Russell, Nina Wantia, Oliver Hayden","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.00888-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urinary tract infections are among the most prevalent bacterial infections worldwide, typically diagnosed using clinical symptoms, dipstick tests, and laboratory methods requiring standardized bacterial suspensions for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). This study evaluated two rapid disk diffusion methods for urine samples that incorporate bacterial concentration into the analysis, eliminating the need for standardized suspensions. The threshold-adapted approach compares inhibition zones to concentration-specific breakpoints derived from reference strains, while the regression-based method transforms inhibition zones at various concentrations into predicted standard (0.5 McFarland) values using a linear model. In both methods, urine and antibiotic disks are applied to one agar plate for disk diffusion, while a separate plate determines bacterial concentration, enables isolation, and supports matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis. This simultaneous processing reduces diagnostic time by 18-24 hours. The approaches were compared with traditional disk diffusion testing using defined bacterial suspensions, reference strains, and clinical urine samples. In trials using defined suspensions from 0.5 McFarland to 10<b><sup>3</sup></b> CFU/mL, the threshold-adapted method achieved 94.7% and 94.1% categorical agreement for susceptible and resistant bacteria, respectively; the regression-based method achieved 100% for susceptible and 88.2% for resistant bacteria. When urine was applied directly, both methods showed 93.7% true susceptible and 94.1% true resistant agreement with standard testing. By integrating inhibition zone size, antibiotic, species, and bacterial concentration, these rapid AST methods streamline urine diagnostics and show high agreement with standard testing-highlighting their potential as practical alternatives to conventional AST, particularly in resource-limited settings where reduced diagnostic time and simplified laboratory procedures can significantly improve patient care.IMPORTANCEAntibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) for urinary tract infections typically requires time-consuming standardization of bacterial suspensions, delaying targeted treatment. Prior direct susceptibility testing (DST) approaches have largely overlooked the inoculum effect, testing at a single, arbitrary concentration and risking misclassification of both resistant and susceptible isolates. This study presents two rapid disk diffusion methods that systemically incorporate bacterial concentration into the analysis, enabling direct testing from urine samples without prior inoculum adjustment. Both approaches demonstrated high agreement with standard AST and reduced diagnostic time by up to 24 hours. These concentration-aware methods may streamline susceptibility testing workflows, particularly in resource-limited settings, and represent a practical advancement toward faster, clinically reliable DST.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0088825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid direct disk diffusion testing for antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infections: a bacterial concentration-adjusted approach.\",\"authors\":\"Henning Sabersky-Müssigbrodt, Seoras Russell, Nina Wantia, Oliver Hayden\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.00888-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Urinary tract infections are among the most prevalent bacterial infections worldwide, typically diagnosed using clinical symptoms, dipstick tests, and laboratory methods requiring standardized bacterial suspensions for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). This study evaluated two rapid disk diffusion methods for urine samples that incorporate bacterial concentration into the analysis, eliminating the need for standardized suspensions. The threshold-adapted approach compares inhibition zones to concentration-specific breakpoints derived from reference strains, while the regression-based method transforms inhibition zones at various concentrations into predicted standard (0.5 McFarland) values using a linear model. In both methods, urine and antibiotic disks are applied to one agar plate for disk diffusion, while a separate plate determines bacterial concentration, enables isolation, and supports matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis. This simultaneous processing reduces diagnostic time by 18-24 hours. The approaches were compared with traditional disk diffusion testing using defined bacterial suspensions, reference strains, and clinical urine samples. In trials using defined suspensions from 0.5 McFarland to 10<b><sup>3</sup></b> CFU/mL, the threshold-adapted method achieved 94.7% and 94.1% categorical agreement for susceptible and resistant bacteria, respectively; the regression-based method achieved 100% for susceptible and 88.2% for resistant bacteria. When urine was applied directly, both methods showed 93.7% true susceptible and 94.1% true resistant agreement with standard testing. By integrating inhibition zone size, antibiotic, species, and bacterial concentration, these rapid AST methods streamline urine diagnostics and show high agreement with standard testing-highlighting their potential as practical alternatives to conventional AST, particularly in resource-limited settings where reduced diagnostic time and simplified laboratory procedures can significantly improve patient care.IMPORTANCEAntibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) for urinary tract infections typically requires time-consuming standardization of bacterial suspensions, delaying targeted treatment. Prior direct susceptibility testing (DST) approaches have largely overlooked the inoculum effect, testing at a single, arbitrary concentration and risking misclassification of both resistant and susceptible isolates. This study presents two rapid disk diffusion methods that systemically incorporate bacterial concentration into the analysis, enabling direct testing from urine samples without prior inoculum adjustment. Both approaches demonstrated high agreement with standard AST and reduced diagnostic time by up to 24 hours. These concentration-aware methods may streamline susceptibility testing workflows, particularly in resource-limited settings, and represent a practical advancement toward faster, clinically reliable DST.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0088825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00888-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00888-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿路感染是世界上最普遍的细菌感染之一,通常通过临床症状、试纸试验和需要标准化细菌悬浮液进行抗生素敏感性试验(AST)的实验室方法进行诊断。本研究评估了两种尿样快速圆盘扩散方法,将细菌浓度纳入分析,消除了标准化悬浮液的需要。适应阈值的方法将抑制带与参考菌株的浓度特定断点进行比较,而基于回归的方法使用线性模型将不同浓度下的抑制带转换为预测的标准(0.5麦克法兰)值。在这两种方法中,将尿液和抗生素磁盘应用于一个琼脂板上进行磁盘扩散,而另一个单独的板确定细菌浓度,进行分离,并支持基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)分析。这种同时处理将诊断时间缩短了18-24小时。采用定义的细菌悬浮液、参考菌株和临床尿液样本对传统的纸片扩散检测方法进行比较。在使用从0.5 McFarland到103 CFU/mL的定义悬浮液的试验中,适应阈值的方法对敏感菌和耐药菌的分类一致性分别为94.7%和94.1%;基于回归的方法对敏感菌的检出率为100%,对耐药菌的检出率为88.2%。直接使用尿液时,两种方法的真敏感和耐药阳性率分别为93.7%和94.1%。通过整合抑制区大小、抗生素、菌种和细菌浓度,这些快速AST方法简化了尿液诊断,并与标准测试高度一致,突出了它们作为传统AST的实用替代方案的潜力,特别是在资源有限的环境中,减少诊断时间和简化实验室程序可以显著改善患者护理。尿路感染的抗生素敏感性检测(AST)通常需要耗时的细菌悬浮液标准化,从而延迟靶向治疗。先前的直接药敏试验(DST)方法在很大程度上忽视了接种效应,以单一、任意浓度进行测试,并有可能对耐药和敏感分离株进行错误分类。本研究提出了两种快速的圆盘扩散方法,系统地将细菌浓度纳入分析,使尿液样品的直接检测无需事先调整接种量。两种方法均显示与标准AST高度一致,并将诊断时间缩短了24小时。这些浓度敏感的方法可以简化药敏试验的工作流程,特别是在资源有限的情况下,并且代表了更快、临床可靠的DST的实际进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid direct disk diffusion testing for antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infections: a bacterial concentration-adjusted approach.

Urinary tract infections are among the most prevalent bacterial infections worldwide, typically diagnosed using clinical symptoms, dipstick tests, and laboratory methods requiring standardized bacterial suspensions for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). This study evaluated two rapid disk diffusion methods for urine samples that incorporate bacterial concentration into the analysis, eliminating the need for standardized suspensions. The threshold-adapted approach compares inhibition zones to concentration-specific breakpoints derived from reference strains, while the regression-based method transforms inhibition zones at various concentrations into predicted standard (0.5 McFarland) values using a linear model. In both methods, urine and antibiotic disks are applied to one agar plate for disk diffusion, while a separate plate determines bacterial concentration, enables isolation, and supports matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis. This simultaneous processing reduces diagnostic time by 18-24 hours. The approaches were compared with traditional disk diffusion testing using defined bacterial suspensions, reference strains, and clinical urine samples. In trials using defined suspensions from 0.5 McFarland to 103 CFU/mL, the threshold-adapted method achieved 94.7% and 94.1% categorical agreement for susceptible and resistant bacteria, respectively; the regression-based method achieved 100% for susceptible and 88.2% for resistant bacteria. When urine was applied directly, both methods showed 93.7% true susceptible and 94.1% true resistant agreement with standard testing. By integrating inhibition zone size, antibiotic, species, and bacterial concentration, these rapid AST methods streamline urine diagnostics and show high agreement with standard testing-highlighting their potential as practical alternatives to conventional AST, particularly in resource-limited settings where reduced diagnostic time and simplified laboratory procedures can significantly improve patient care.IMPORTANCEAntibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) for urinary tract infections typically requires time-consuming standardization of bacterial suspensions, delaying targeted treatment. Prior direct susceptibility testing (DST) approaches have largely overlooked the inoculum effect, testing at a single, arbitrary concentration and risking misclassification of both resistant and susceptible isolates. This study presents two rapid disk diffusion methods that systemically incorporate bacterial concentration into the analysis, enabling direct testing from urine samples without prior inoculum adjustment. Both approaches demonstrated high agreement with standard AST and reduced diagnostic time by up to 24 hours. These concentration-aware methods may streamline susceptibility testing workflows, particularly in resource-limited settings, and represent a practical advancement toward faster, clinically reliable DST.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信