从维度到动态到结果-淋巴结和皮肤评估预测CTCL的结果。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Alexander Kaminsky, Lauren M Fahmy, Zaid Bilgrami, Hye Ryung Yang, Volkan Beylergil, Mengxi Zhou, Sara Suhl, Susan E Bates, Tito Fojo, Hao Yang, Lawrence H Schwartz, Larisa J Geskin
{"title":"从维度到动态到结果-淋巴结和皮肤评估预测CTCL的结果。","authors":"Alexander Kaminsky, Lauren M Fahmy, Zaid Bilgrami, Hye Ryung Yang, Volkan Beylergil, Mengxi Zhou, Sara Suhl, Susan E Bates, Tito Fojo, Hao Yang, Lawrence H Schwartz, Larisa J Geskin","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2553863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiologic nodal staging in CTCL traditionally uses a 1.5 cm longest diameter (LDi) cutoff; however, this lacks validation and may misclassify risk. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 6,095 CT scans from 262 CTCL patients in the MAVORIC trial using unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric LN measurements and mSWAT scores. Optimal cutoffs were determined <i>via</i> ROC analysis and landmarking adjusted for informative censoring. Additionally, kinetic modeling growth rates (<i>g</i>) were calculated for both LN and skin scores. We demonstrated that LDi > 1.5 cm did not predict OS (<i>p</i> = 0.8). However, baseline volumetric cutoffs (3,945 mm<sup>3</sup>; AUC = 0.67) stratified OS (median 43.6 months vs NA, log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.035); post‑landmark analysis (6,930 mm<sup>3</sup>) enhanced discrimination. High <i>g</i> (volumetric or mSWAT) independently predicted shorter OS/PFS/TTF (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A combined model (volume + g) had C‑index 0.63 versus 0.60 for volume alone. We conclude that volumetric and dynamic metrics outperform conventional measures in predicting CTCL outcomes. Incorporating these methods into staging and trial criteria is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From dimensions through dynamics to outcomes - lymph nodes and skin assessments predict CTCL outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Kaminsky, Lauren M Fahmy, Zaid Bilgrami, Hye Ryung Yang, Volkan Beylergil, Mengxi Zhou, Sara Suhl, Susan E Bates, Tito Fojo, Hao Yang, Lawrence H Schwartz, Larisa J Geskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2025.2553863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radiologic nodal staging in CTCL traditionally uses a 1.5 cm longest diameter (LDi) cutoff; however, this lacks validation and may misclassify risk. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 6,095 CT scans from 262 CTCL patients in the MAVORIC trial using unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric LN measurements and mSWAT scores. Optimal cutoffs were determined <i>via</i> ROC analysis and landmarking adjusted for informative censoring. Additionally, kinetic modeling growth rates (<i>g</i>) were calculated for both LN and skin scores. We demonstrated that LDi > 1.5 cm did not predict OS (<i>p</i> = 0.8). However, baseline volumetric cutoffs (3,945 mm<sup>3</sup>; AUC = 0.67) stratified OS (median 43.6 months vs NA, log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.035); post‑landmark analysis (6,930 mm<sup>3</sup>) enhanced discrimination. High <i>g</i> (volumetric or mSWAT) independently predicted shorter OS/PFS/TTF (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A combined model (volume + g) had C‑index 0.63 versus 0.60 for volume alone. We conclude that volumetric and dynamic metrics outperform conventional measures in predicting CTCL outcomes. Incorporating these methods into staging and trial criteria is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2553863\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2553863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,CTCL的放射分期采用1.5 cm的最长直径(LDi)截止;然而,这缺乏验证,可能会错误地分类风险。我们对MAVORIC试验中262例CTCL患者的6095份CT扫描进行了回顾性分析,使用一维、二维、体积LN测量和mSWAT评分。通过ROC分析确定最佳截止点,并根据信息审查调整地标。此外,计算LN和皮肤评分的动力学建模增长率(g)。我们证明LDi > 1.5 cm不能预测OS (p = 0.8)。然而,基线体积截断值(3,945 mm3; AUC = 0.67)分层OS(中位43.6个月vs NA, log-rank p = 0.035);地标后分析(6,930 mm3)增强了歧视。高g(体积或mSWAT)独立地预测较短的OS/PFS/TTF (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From dimensions through dynamics to outcomes - lymph nodes and skin assessments predict CTCL outcomes.

Radiologic nodal staging in CTCL traditionally uses a 1.5 cm longest diameter (LDi) cutoff; however, this lacks validation and may misclassify risk. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 6,095 CT scans from 262 CTCL patients in the MAVORIC trial using unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric LN measurements and mSWAT scores. Optimal cutoffs were determined via ROC analysis and landmarking adjusted for informative censoring. Additionally, kinetic modeling growth rates (g) were calculated for both LN and skin scores. We demonstrated that LDi > 1.5 cm did not predict OS (p = 0.8). However, baseline volumetric cutoffs (3,945 mm3; AUC = 0.67) stratified OS (median 43.6 months vs NA, log-rank p = 0.035); post‑landmark analysis (6,930 mm3) enhanced discrimination. High g (volumetric or mSWAT) independently predicted shorter OS/PFS/TTF (p < 0.05). A combined model (volume + g) had C‑index 0.63 versus 0.60 for volume alone. We conclude that volumetric and dynamic metrics outperform conventional measures in predicting CTCL outcomes. Incorporating these methods into staging and trial criteria is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信