脓毒症治疗后截肢患者经皮骨整合:9例患者,平均随访4年。

IF 1.3 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexis C Panzures, Muhammad A Akhtar, Jason S Hoellwarth, Kevin Tetsworth, Munjed Al Muderis
{"title":"脓毒症治疗后截肢患者经皮骨整合:9例患者,平均随访4年。","authors":"Alexis C Panzures, Muhammad A Akhtar, Jason S Hoellwarth, Kevin Tetsworth, Munjed Al Muderis","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcutaneous osseointegration following amputation (TOFA) is an alternative to standard prosthesis by directly anchoring a metal implant to the skeletal residuum. However, there is a paucity of data concerning whether TOFA is safe and reasonable for patients with lower limb amputation to manage complications of sepsis. The primary aim of this study was to record adverse post-TOFA events for nine patients (15 limbs) whose index amputations were performed to manage sepsis-related complications. The secondary aim was to compare the pre- and post-TOFA mobility and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of our practice's prospectively maintained osseointegration database was performed. Patients with transfemoral and/or transtibial osseointegration for a limb in which the original amputation was performed to manage sepsis, at least two years prior to the study date, were included. This yielded nine patients with 15 osseointegrated limbs. Adverse events were antibiotics for infection or unplanned surgery. Outcomes were recorded using the SF-36 Health Survey and the Questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation. Formal mobility evaluations included a 6-minute walk test and physician-determined K-levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had a mean age of 42.8 ± 6.5 (range: 35.0-52.4) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.2 ± 11.0 (18.4-54.5). Six patients (67%) underwent bilateral osseointegration, and three (33%) patients underwent unilateral osseointegration. Six patients (67%) representing 12 limbs (80%) had an uneventful course post-osseointegration. One (11%) patient had intravenous antibiotics to manage a superficial infection. One (11%) other patient had a periprosthetic femur fracture managed by open reduction internal fixation. No systemic complications, additional surgeries, or implant removals occurred. 75% (6/8) achieved K-level ≥ 2 post-osseointegration. There was no significant change in the 6-minute walk test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower limb osseointegration is a safe and effective rehabilitation option for patients whose amputations were a result of sepsis.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Further judicious use of TOFA for these patients seems highly merited.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Panzures AC, Akhtar MA, Hoellwarth, JS, <i>et al</i>. Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees as a Result of Sepsis Management: A Case Series of Nine Patients with a Mean Follow-up of 4 Years. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):17-24.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"20 1","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees as a Result of Sepsis Management: A Case Series of Nine Patients with a Mean Follow-up of 4 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis C Panzures, Muhammad A Akhtar, Jason S Hoellwarth, Kevin Tetsworth, Munjed Al Muderis\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcutaneous osseointegration following amputation (TOFA) is an alternative to standard prosthesis by directly anchoring a metal implant to the skeletal residuum. However, there is a paucity of data concerning whether TOFA is safe and reasonable for patients with lower limb amputation to manage complications of sepsis. The primary aim of this study was to record adverse post-TOFA events for nine patients (15 limbs) whose index amputations were performed to manage sepsis-related complications. The secondary aim was to compare the pre- and post-TOFA mobility and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of our practice's prospectively maintained osseointegration database was performed. Patients with transfemoral and/or transtibial osseointegration for a limb in which the original amputation was performed to manage sepsis, at least two years prior to the study date, were included. This yielded nine patients with 15 osseointegrated limbs. Adverse events were antibiotics for infection or unplanned surgery. Outcomes were recorded using the SF-36 Health Survey and the Questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation. Formal mobility evaluations included a 6-minute walk test and physician-determined K-levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had a mean age of 42.8 ± 6.5 (range: 35.0-52.4) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.2 ± 11.0 (18.4-54.5). Six patients (67%) underwent bilateral osseointegration, and three (33%) patients underwent unilateral osseointegration. Six patients (67%) representing 12 limbs (80%) had an uneventful course post-osseointegration. One (11%) patient had intravenous antibiotics to manage a superficial infection. One (11%) other patient had a periprosthetic femur fracture managed by open reduction internal fixation. No systemic complications, additional surgeries, or implant removals occurred. 75% (6/8) achieved K-level ≥ 2 post-osseointegration. There was no significant change in the 6-minute walk test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower limb osseointegration is a safe and effective rehabilitation option for patients whose amputations were a result of sepsis.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Further judicious use of TOFA for these patients seems highly merited.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Panzures AC, Akhtar MA, Hoellwarth, JS, <i>et al</i>. Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees as a Result of Sepsis Management: A Case Series of Nine Patients with a Mean Follow-up of 4 Years. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):17-24.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445137/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮截肢后骨整合(TOFA)是一种替代标准假体的方法,通过将金属植入物直接锚定在骨残体上。然而,对于下肢截肢患者进行TOFA治疗脓毒症并发症是否安全合理,目前缺乏相关数据。本研究的主要目的是记录9例患者(15条肢体)的tofa后不良事件,这些患者为控制败血症相关并发症而进行了食指截肢。次要目的是比较tofa前后的活动性和生活质量(QoL)。方法:回顾性回顾我们的实践前瞻性维护骨整合数据库进行。该研究纳入了在研究日期前至少2年的经股骨和/或经胫骨骨整合肢体的患者,这些患者最初截肢是为了控制败血症。9例患者有15条骨整合肢体。不良事件为感染抗生素或计划外手术。使用SF-36健康调查和经股截肢者问卷记录结果。正式的活动能力评估包括6分钟步行测试和医生确定的k水平。结果:该队列的平均年龄为42.8±6.5岁(范围:35.0-52.4)岁。平均体重指数(BMI)为27.2±11.0(18.4-54.5)。6例(67%)患者行双侧骨整合,3例(33%)患者行单侧骨整合。6名患者(67%)代表12个肢体(80%)在骨整合后的过程中表现平平。1例(11%)患者接受静脉注射抗生素治疗浅表感染。1例(11%)其他患者采用切开复位内固定治疗假体周围股骨骨折。没有发生全身并发症、额外手术或植入物移除。75%(6/8)达到骨融合后k水平≥2。在6分钟步行测试中没有明显的变化。结论:下肢骨整合对于脓毒症截肢患者是一种安全有效的康复选择。临床意义:对于这些患者,进一步明智地使用TOFA似乎是非常值得的。如何引用本文:Panzures AC, Akhtar MA, hoellworth, JS等。脓毒症治疗后截肢患者经皮骨整合:9例患者,平均随访4年。创伤肢体重建2025;20(1):17-24。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees as a Result of Sepsis Management: A Case Series of Nine Patients with a Mean Follow-up of 4 Years.

Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees as a Result of Sepsis Management: A Case Series of Nine Patients with a Mean Follow-up of 4 Years.

Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees as a Result of Sepsis Management: A Case Series of Nine Patients with a Mean Follow-up of 4 Years.

Background: Transcutaneous osseointegration following amputation (TOFA) is an alternative to standard prosthesis by directly anchoring a metal implant to the skeletal residuum. However, there is a paucity of data concerning whether TOFA is safe and reasonable for patients with lower limb amputation to manage complications of sepsis. The primary aim of this study was to record adverse post-TOFA events for nine patients (15 limbs) whose index amputations were performed to manage sepsis-related complications. The secondary aim was to compare the pre- and post-TOFA mobility and quality of life (QoL).

Methods: A retrospective review of our practice's prospectively maintained osseointegration database was performed. Patients with transfemoral and/or transtibial osseointegration for a limb in which the original amputation was performed to manage sepsis, at least two years prior to the study date, were included. This yielded nine patients with 15 osseointegrated limbs. Adverse events were antibiotics for infection or unplanned surgery. Outcomes were recorded using the SF-36 Health Survey and the Questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation. Formal mobility evaluations included a 6-minute walk test and physician-determined K-levels.

Results: The cohort had a mean age of 42.8 ± 6.5 (range: 35.0-52.4) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.2 ± 11.0 (18.4-54.5). Six patients (67%) underwent bilateral osseointegration, and three (33%) patients underwent unilateral osseointegration. Six patients (67%) representing 12 limbs (80%) had an uneventful course post-osseointegration. One (11%) patient had intravenous antibiotics to manage a superficial infection. One (11%) other patient had a periprosthetic femur fracture managed by open reduction internal fixation. No systemic complications, additional surgeries, or implant removals occurred. 75% (6/8) achieved K-level ≥ 2 post-osseointegration. There was no significant change in the 6-minute walk test.

Conclusion: Lower limb osseointegration is a safe and effective rehabilitation option for patients whose amputations were a result of sepsis.

Clinical significance: Further judicious use of TOFA for these patients seems highly merited.

How to cite this article: Panzures AC, Akhtar MA, Hoellwarth, JS, et al. Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees as a Result of Sepsis Management: A Case Series of Nine Patients with a Mean Follow-up of 4 Years. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2025;20(1):17-24.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信