Karan Rao, Princess Neila Litkouhi, Alexandra Baer, Peter Hansen, Ravinay Bhindi
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置换术后当日出院的可行性:北岸当日停留路径。","authors":"Karan Rao, Princess Neila Litkouhi, Alexandra Baer, Peter Hansen, Ravinay Bhindi","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02598-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis but expanding indications have increased strain on hospital resources. Several studies assessed same-day discharge (SDD) after TAVR during the COVID-19 pandemic and showed it to be safe in well-selected, low-risk patients. However, more studies are warranted, with no studies in an Australian population and minimal data on self-expanding valves. Patients undergoing consecutive, transfemoral TAVR procedures at two large-volume centres in Sydney, Australia between 2021 and 2023 were prospectively recruited to the CONDUCT-TAVI study cohort. A locally derived clinical pathway ('The North Shore Pathway') was retrospectively applied to identify which patients would have been suitable for SDD. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were compared between SDD patients and the remaining, ineligible patients (standard discharge cohort). Of 182 patients, 20 (11.0%) met SDD criteria. The total cohort received both self-expanding (67.3%) and balloon-expandable valves (32.7%). The SDD cohort had a higher proportion of females (55.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.04) but was otherwise comparable in baseline and procedural characteristics. No significant differences were found in hospital or 30-day outcomes. One SDD patient was readmitted with complete heart block requiring pacemaker implantation (day 20), and two patients had non-cardiovascular readmissions. No other adverse outcomes occurred in the SDD cohort. The present study suggests SDD after TAVR is feasible in both balloon-expandable and self-expanding cohorts. The study also supports prospective validation of the North Shore Day Stay pathway as a tool to safely identify low-risk patients that are suitable for SDD after TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of same-day discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the North Shore Day Stay pathway.\",\"authors\":\"Karan Rao, Princess Neila Litkouhi, Alexandra Baer, Peter Hansen, Ravinay Bhindi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00380-025-02598-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis but expanding indications have increased strain on hospital resources. Several studies assessed same-day discharge (SDD) after TAVR during the COVID-19 pandemic and showed it to be safe in well-selected, low-risk patients. However, more studies are warranted, with no studies in an Australian population and minimal data on self-expanding valves. Patients undergoing consecutive, transfemoral TAVR procedures at two large-volume centres in Sydney, Australia between 2021 and 2023 were prospectively recruited to the CONDUCT-TAVI study cohort. A locally derived clinical pathway ('The North Shore Pathway') was retrospectively applied to identify which patients would have been suitable for SDD. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were compared between SDD patients and the remaining, ineligible patients (standard discharge cohort). Of 182 patients, 20 (11.0%) met SDD criteria. The total cohort received both self-expanding (67.3%) and balloon-expandable valves (32.7%). The SDD cohort had a higher proportion of females (55.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.04) but was otherwise comparable in baseline and procedural characteristics. No significant differences were found in hospital or 30-day outcomes. One SDD patient was readmitted with complete heart block requiring pacemaker implantation (day 20), and two patients had non-cardiovascular readmissions. No other adverse outcomes occurred in the SDD cohort. The present study suggests SDD after TAVR is feasible in both balloon-expandable and self-expanding cohorts. The study also supports prospective validation of the North Shore Day Stay pathway as a tool to safely identify low-risk patients that are suitable for SDD after TAVR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02598-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02598-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是治疗严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的常用方法,但适应症的扩大增加了医院资源的压力。几项研究评估了COVID-19大流行期间TAVR后的当日出院(SDD),并表明它对精心挑选的低风险患者是安全的。然而,还需要进行更多的研究,目前还没有针对澳大利亚人群的研究,关于自膨胀瓣膜的数据也很少。在2021年至2023年期间,在澳大利亚悉尼的两个大容量中心连续接受经股骨TAVR手术的患者被前瞻性招募到传导- tavi研究队列中。回顾性应用当地衍生的临床路径(“北岸路径”)来确定哪些患者适合SDD。比较SDD患者和其他不符合条件的患者(标准出院队列)的住院和30天结局。182例患者中,20例(11.0%)符合SDD标准。整个队列接受自膨胀瓣膜(67.3%)和球囊膨胀瓣膜(32.7%)。SDD队列的女性比例较高(55.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.04),但在基线和程序特征方面具有可比性。在医院或30天的结果中没有发现显著差异。1例SDD患者因完全性心脏传导阻滞而再次入院,需要植入起搏器(第20天),2例非心血管疾病患者再次入院。在SDD队列中未发生其他不良结局。本研究提示TAVR后SDD在球囊扩张和自扩张队列中都是可行的。该研究还支持了北岸日间停留途径作为安全识别TAVR后适合SDD的低风险患者的工具的前瞻性验证。
Feasibility of same-day discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the North Shore Day Stay pathway.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis but expanding indications have increased strain on hospital resources. Several studies assessed same-day discharge (SDD) after TAVR during the COVID-19 pandemic and showed it to be safe in well-selected, low-risk patients. However, more studies are warranted, with no studies in an Australian population and minimal data on self-expanding valves. Patients undergoing consecutive, transfemoral TAVR procedures at two large-volume centres in Sydney, Australia between 2021 and 2023 were prospectively recruited to the CONDUCT-TAVI study cohort. A locally derived clinical pathway ('The North Shore Pathway') was retrospectively applied to identify which patients would have been suitable for SDD. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were compared between SDD patients and the remaining, ineligible patients (standard discharge cohort). Of 182 patients, 20 (11.0%) met SDD criteria. The total cohort received both self-expanding (67.3%) and balloon-expandable valves (32.7%). The SDD cohort had a higher proportion of females (55.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.04) but was otherwise comparable in baseline and procedural characteristics. No significant differences were found in hospital or 30-day outcomes. One SDD patient was readmitted with complete heart block requiring pacemaker implantation (day 20), and two patients had non-cardiovascular readmissions. No other adverse outcomes occurred in the SDD cohort. The present study suggests SDD after TAVR is feasible in both balloon-expandable and self-expanding cohorts. The study also supports prospective validation of the North Shore Day Stay pathway as a tool to safely identify low-risk patients that are suitable for SDD after TAVR.
期刊介绍:
Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.