模拟成人心脏骤停时,单纯按压CPR和标准CPR的氧分压比较——基于人体模型的临床模型。

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_495_25
Pankaj Kundra, Stalin Vinayagam, Anusha Cherian, Balakrishnan Ashokka
{"title":"模拟成人心脏骤停时,单纯按压CPR和标准CPR的氧分压比较——基于人体模型的临床模型。","authors":"Pankaj Kundra, Stalin Vinayagam, Anusha Cherian, Balakrishnan Ashokka","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_495_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be as effective as conventional CPR, and oxygen supplementation during compression-only CPR may be beneficial. The study aimed to compare the arterial oxygen levels achieved while supplementing oxygen through high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during compression-only CPR and bag-mask ventilation (BMV) during conventional CPR in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios on a high-fidelity simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a simulated cardiac arrest created on a human patient simulator (HPS). The simulation included two sets of scenarios. In Simulation A, cardiac arrest was simulated on HPS, and compression-only CPR was provided by AutoPulse, and oxygen supplementation was provided using HFNC. In Simulation B, chest compression was provided by AutoPulse, and BMV was supplemented with oxygen at 15 L/min at a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2. Both simulation scenarios were evaluated for three different starting PaO<sub>2</sub> values: 100 mmHg, 80 mmHg, and 60 mmHg. The change in PaO<sub>2</sub> and PAO<sub>2</sub> values was recorded every minute for 6 minutes. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics (Version 24.0; IBM, Armonk, NY), and <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Simulation A, at a starting PaO<sub>2</sub> of 100 mmHg, there was an increase in the PaO<sub>2</sub> at the 2<sup>nd</sup> minute, which was sustained till the 6<sup>th</sup> minute. PaO<sub>2</sub> values were persistently higher at all time points as compared to Simulation B (<i>P</i> < 0.001). At a starting PaO<sub>2</sub> of 80 mmHg, there was no change in PaO<sub>2</sub> in Simulation A as compared to a sustained fall in Simulation B (<i>P</i> < 0.001). At the starting PaO<sub>2</sub> of 60 mmHg, a decrease in PaO<sub>2</sub> was observed in both Simulation A and Simulation B (<i>P</i> = 0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a simulated setting, compression-only CPR with HFNC results in better PaO<sub>2</sub> levels compared to conventional CPR with BMV.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 10","pages":"1055-1060"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of partial pressure of oxygen between compression-only CPR and standard CPR in simulated adult cardiac arrest - A manikin-based clinical modelling.\",\"authors\":\"Pankaj Kundra, Stalin Vinayagam, Anusha Cherian, Balakrishnan Ashokka\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_495_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be as effective as conventional CPR, and oxygen supplementation during compression-only CPR may be beneficial. The study aimed to compare the arterial oxygen levels achieved while supplementing oxygen through high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during compression-only CPR and bag-mask ventilation (BMV) during conventional CPR in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios on a high-fidelity simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a simulated cardiac arrest created on a human patient simulator (HPS). The simulation included two sets of scenarios. In Simulation A, cardiac arrest was simulated on HPS, and compression-only CPR was provided by AutoPulse, and oxygen supplementation was provided using HFNC. In Simulation B, chest compression was provided by AutoPulse, and BMV was supplemented with oxygen at 15 L/min at a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2. Both simulation scenarios were evaluated for three different starting PaO<sub>2</sub> values: 100 mmHg, 80 mmHg, and 60 mmHg. The change in PaO<sub>2</sub> and PAO<sub>2</sub> values was recorded every minute for 6 minutes. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics (Version 24.0; IBM, Armonk, NY), and <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Simulation A, at a starting PaO<sub>2</sub> of 100 mmHg, there was an increase in the PaO<sub>2</sub> at the 2<sup>nd</sup> minute, which was sustained till the 6<sup>th</sup> minute. PaO<sub>2</sub> values were persistently higher at all time points as compared to Simulation B (<i>P</i> < 0.001). At a starting PaO<sub>2</sub> of 80 mmHg, there was no change in PaO<sub>2</sub> in Simulation A as compared to a sustained fall in Simulation B (<i>P</i> < 0.001). At the starting PaO<sub>2</sub> of 60 mmHg, a decrease in PaO<sub>2</sub> was observed in both Simulation A and Simulation B (<i>P</i> = 0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a simulated setting, compression-only CPR with HFNC results in better PaO<sub>2</sub> levels compared to conventional CPR with BMV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"69 10\",\"pages\":\"1055-1060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445773/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_495_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_495_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:单纯按压心肺复苏(CPR)已被证明与常规CPR一样有效,在单纯按压心肺复苏期间补充氧气可能是有益的。该研究旨在比较在高保真模拟器上模拟心脏骤停情景时,在纯按压心肺复苏期间通过高流量鼻插管(HFNC)补充氧气和在常规心肺复苏期间通过气囊面罩通气(BMV)补充氧气所达到的动脉氧水平。方法:研究包括在人体病人模拟器(HPS)上模拟心脏骤停。模拟包括两组场景。在模拟A中,在HPS上模拟心脏骤停,由autoppulse提供单纯按压式CPR,并使用HFNC进行补氧。在模拟B中,胸腔按压由autoppulse提供,BMV以15l /min的速度补充氧气,压通比为30:2。在这两种模拟场景中,分别对三种不同的起始PaO2值进行了评估:100 mmHg、80 mmHg和60 mmHg。每分钟记录一次PaO2和PaO2值的变化,持续6分钟。统计学分析采用SPSS Statistics (Version 24.0; IBM, Armonk, NY),以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:在模拟A中,在起始PaO2为100 mmHg时,PaO2在第2分钟升高,并持续至第6分钟。与模拟B相比,PaO2值在所有时间点持续升高(P < 0.001)。在起始PaO2为80 mmHg时,与模拟B的持续下降相比,模拟a的PaO2没有变化(P < 0.001)。在起始PaO2为60 mmHg时,模拟a和模拟B的PaO2均下降(P = 0.57)。结论:在模拟环境中,与BMV常规CPR相比,HFNC单纯按压CPR的PaO2水平更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of partial pressure of oxygen between compression-only CPR and standard CPR in simulated adult cardiac arrest - A manikin-based clinical modelling.

Background and aims: Compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be as effective as conventional CPR, and oxygen supplementation during compression-only CPR may be beneficial. The study aimed to compare the arterial oxygen levels achieved while supplementing oxygen through high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during compression-only CPR and bag-mask ventilation (BMV) during conventional CPR in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios on a high-fidelity simulator.

Methods: The study included a simulated cardiac arrest created on a human patient simulator (HPS). The simulation included two sets of scenarios. In Simulation A, cardiac arrest was simulated on HPS, and compression-only CPR was provided by AutoPulse, and oxygen supplementation was provided using HFNC. In Simulation B, chest compression was provided by AutoPulse, and BMV was supplemented with oxygen at 15 L/min at a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2. Both simulation scenarios were evaluated for three different starting PaO2 values: 100 mmHg, 80 mmHg, and 60 mmHg. The change in PaO2 and PAO2 values was recorded every minute for 6 minutes. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics (Version 24.0; IBM, Armonk, NY), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: In Simulation A, at a starting PaO2 of 100 mmHg, there was an increase in the PaO2 at the 2nd minute, which was sustained till the 6th minute. PaO2 values were persistently higher at all time points as compared to Simulation B (P < 0.001). At a starting PaO2 of 80 mmHg, there was no change in PaO2 in Simulation A as compared to a sustained fall in Simulation B (P < 0.001). At the starting PaO2 of 60 mmHg, a decrease in PaO2 was observed in both Simulation A and Simulation B (P = 0.57).

Conclusion: In a simulated setting, compression-only CPR with HFNC results in better PaO2 levels compared to conventional CPR with BMV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信