不同硫酸粘菌素方案治疗神经危重症患者耐碳青霉烯革兰氏阴性菌肺炎的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Qian Zeng, Huawei Huang, Jiaqi Lu, Lei Wu, Shaolan Zhang, Jingwei Zhao, Guangqiang Chen, Hongliang Li, Guangzhi Shi
{"title":"不同硫酸粘菌素方案治疗神经危重症患者耐碳青霉烯革兰氏阴性菌肺炎的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Qian Zeng, Huawei Huang, Jiaqi Lu, Lei Wu, Shaolan Zhang, Jingwei Zhao, Guangqiang Chen, Hongliang Li, Guangzhi Shi","doi":"10.1128/aac.00644-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nosocomial infection caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is a common problem in neurocritical care patients. Clinical evidence suggests that polymyxins have benefits for CR-GNB pneumonia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different colistin sulfate regimens in CR-GNB pneumonia. Among 133 neurocritical care patients with CR-GNB pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU), 24 received nebulized colistin sulfate alone (NC group); 38 received intravenous colistin sulfate alone (IV group); and 71 received nebulized plus intravenous colistin sulfate (NCIV group). After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), clinical failure rates on days 7 and 14 were significantly higher in the IV group than in the NC group (38.3% vs. 20.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.017 and 32.1% vs. 15.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.004, respectively) and the NCIV group (38.3% vs. 24.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.023 and 32.1% vs. 14.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.015, respectively). Moreover, the IV group also reported a lower microbiological eradication rate on day 14 (<i>P</i> = 0.031) and longer ICU (<i>P</i> = 0.020) and hospital stays (<i>P</i> = 0.037) than the NCIV group. No significant difference in mortality risk and nephrotoxicity among the groups. In multivariable analysis, intravenous colistin sulfate was an independent factor associated with higher clinical failure on day 14 (adjusted odds ratio = 5.92, 95% CI = 1.14-30.84, <i>P</i> = 0.035). Our study suggested that nebulized colistin sulfate with concurrent intravenous administration may be an effective and safe option for CR-GNB pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0064425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different colistin sulfate regimens for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria pneumonia in neurocritical care patients: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Zeng, Huawei Huang, Jiaqi Lu, Lei Wu, Shaolan Zhang, Jingwei Zhao, Guangqiang Chen, Hongliang Li, Guangzhi Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.00644-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nosocomial infection caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is a common problem in neurocritical care patients. Clinical evidence suggests that polymyxins have benefits for CR-GNB pneumonia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different colistin sulfate regimens in CR-GNB pneumonia. Among 133 neurocritical care patients with CR-GNB pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU), 24 received nebulized colistin sulfate alone (NC group); 38 received intravenous colistin sulfate alone (IV group); and 71 received nebulized plus intravenous colistin sulfate (NCIV group). After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), clinical failure rates on days 7 and 14 were significantly higher in the IV group than in the NC group (38.3% vs. 20.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.017 and 32.1% vs. 15.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.004, respectively) and the NCIV group (38.3% vs. 24.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.023 and 32.1% vs. 14.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.015, respectively). Moreover, the IV group also reported a lower microbiological eradication rate on day 14 (<i>P</i> = 0.031) and longer ICU (<i>P</i> = 0.020) and hospital stays (<i>P</i> = 0.037) than the NCIV group. No significant difference in mortality risk and nephrotoxicity among the groups. In multivariable analysis, intravenous colistin sulfate was an independent factor associated with higher clinical failure on day 14 (adjusted odds ratio = 5.92, 95% CI = 1.14-30.84, <i>P</i> = 0.035). Our study suggested that nebulized colistin sulfate with concurrent intravenous administration may be an effective and safe option for CR-GNB pneumonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0064425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00644-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00644-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耐碳青霉烯革兰氏阴性菌(CR-GNB)引起的医院感染是神经危重症患者的常见问题。临床证据表明,多粘菌素对CR-GNB肺炎有益。本研究比较了不同硫酸粘菌素方案治疗CR-GNB肺炎的疗效和安全性。在重症监护病房(ICU) 133例神经危重症合并CR-GNB肺炎患者中,24例接受单独雾化硫酸粘菌素治疗(NC组);单独静脉注射硫酸粘菌素38例(IV组);雾化加静脉注射硫酸粘菌素71例(NCIV组)。经治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)计算,IV组第7、14天的临床失败率显著高于NC组(38.3%∶20.5%,P = 0.017; 32.1%∶15.3%,P = 0.004)和NCIV组(38.3%∶24.7%,P = 0.023; 32.1%∶14.2%,P = 0.015)。此外,静脉注射组在第14天的微生物根除率也低于NCIV组(P = 0.031), ICU (P = 0.020)和住院时间(P = 0.037)更长。各组之间的死亡风险和肾毒性无显著差异。在多变量分析中,静脉注射硫酸粘菌素是第14天临床失败率较高的独立因素(校正优势比= 5.92,95% CI = 1.14-30.84, P = 0.035)。我们的研究表明,雾化硫酸粘菌素同时静脉给药可能是治疗CR-GNB肺炎的一种有效和安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different colistin sulfate regimens for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria pneumonia in neurocritical care patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Nosocomial infection caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is a common problem in neurocritical care patients. Clinical evidence suggests that polymyxins have benefits for CR-GNB pneumonia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different colistin sulfate regimens in CR-GNB pneumonia. Among 133 neurocritical care patients with CR-GNB pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU), 24 received nebulized colistin sulfate alone (NC group); 38 received intravenous colistin sulfate alone (IV group); and 71 received nebulized plus intravenous colistin sulfate (NCIV group). After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), clinical failure rates on days 7 and 14 were significantly higher in the IV group than in the NC group (38.3% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.017 and 32.1% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.004, respectively) and the NCIV group (38.3% vs. 24.7%, P = 0.023 and 32.1% vs. 14.2%, P = 0.015, respectively). Moreover, the IV group also reported a lower microbiological eradication rate on day 14 (P = 0.031) and longer ICU (P = 0.020) and hospital stays (P = 0.037) than the NCIV group. No significant difference in mortality risk and nephrotoxicity among the groups. In multivariable analysis, intravenous colistin sulfate was an independent factor associated with higher clinical failure on day 14 (adjusted odds ratio = 5.92, 95% CI = 1.14-30.84, P = 0.035). Our study suggested that nebulized colistin sulfate with concurrent intravenous administration may be an effective and safe option for CR-GNB pneumonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信