左锁骨下动脉现成分支移植在现实世界中的解剖适用性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Comlan Blitti, Julien Die-Loucou, Aline Jazayeri, Olivier Bouchot, Camil-Cassien Bamde, Eric Steinmetz
{"title":"左锁骨下动脉现成分支移植在现实世界中的解剖适用性。","authors":"Comlan Blitti, Julien Die-Loucou, Aline Jazayeri, Olivier Bouchot, Camil-Cassien Bamde, Eric Steinmetz","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the anatomical suitability of thoracic branch endoprothesis (TBE), an \"off-the-shelf\" stent graft, in routine practice at a tertiary French hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. We included patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in zone 2, or in zone 3 with the lesion located <30 mm from the left subclavian artery (LSA), between 2010 and 2024. The morphological parameters of the aorta were measured, and eligibility for TBE (WL Gore, Phoenix, USA) placement was evaluated according to the manufacturer's instructions for use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 210 TEVAR procedures performed during the study period, 97 patients were included. These patients were predominantly male (80.4%), with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 44.0-73.0). Emergency TEVAR was performed in 79.4% of cases. TBE placement was anatomically suitable in 82.5% (80/97) of included cases and in 38.1% (80/210) of all TEVAR procedures. The most frequent cause of anatomical unsuitability was proximal segment length (distance between the distal edge of the LSA and the mid-point of the ostium of the left common carotid artery <20 mm) in 9.3% of cases. Although the aortic and LSA diameters were smaller in patients treated for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury, the rate of unsuitability of TBE placement due to anatomical characteristics was similar whatever the underlying disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This eligibility study highlights the interest of TBE endografts for the management of thoracic aortic lesions, demonstrating their suitability in a wide range of clinical settings. The clinical relevance of this endograft remains to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANATOMIC SUITABILITY OF LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY OFF-THE-SHELF BRANCH GRAFT IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING.\",\"authors\":\"Comlan Blitti, Julien Die-Loucou, Aline Jazayeri, Olivier Bouchot, Camil-Cassien Bamde, Eric Steinmetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the anatomical suitability of thoracic branch endoprothesis (TBE), an \\\"off-the-shelf\\\" stent graft, in routine practice at a tertiary French hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. We included patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in zone 2, or in zone 3 with the lesion located <30 mm from the left subclavian artery (LSA), between 2010 and 2024. The morphological parameters of the aorta were measured, and eligibility for TBE (WL Gore, Phoenix, USA) placement was evaluated according to the manufacturer's instructions for use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 210 TEVAR procedures performed during the study period, 97 patients were included. These patients were predominantly male (80.4%), with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 44.0-73.0). Emergency TEVAR was performed in 79.4% of cases. TBE placement was anatomically suitable in 82.5% (80/97) of included cases and in 38.1% (80/210) of all TEVAR procedures. The most frequent cause of anatomical unsuitability was proximal segment length (distance between the distal edge of the LSA and the mid-point of the ostium of the left common carotid artery <20 mm) in 9.3% of cases. Although the aortic and LSA diameters were smaller in patients treated for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury, the rate of unsuitability of TBE placement due to anatomical characteristics was similar whatever the underlying disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This eligibility study highlights the interest of TBE endografts for the management of thoracic aortic lesions, demonstrating their suitability in a wide range of clinical settings. The clinical relevance of this endograft remains to be determined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在分析法国某三级医院常规手术中胸椎分支内假体(TBE)的解剖适应性,TBE是一种现成的支架。方法:本研究为单中心、回顾性、横断面研究。我们纳入了在2区或3区进行胸椎血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)的患者,病变位于2区。结果:在研究期间进行的210例TEVAR手术中,纳入了97例患者。这些患者以男性为主(80.4%),中位年龄61岁(IQR: 44.0-73.0)。急诊TEVAR占79.4%。82.5%(80/97)的纳入病例和38.1%(80/210)的TEVAR手术在解剖学上是合适的。解剖不适宜的最常见原因是近段长度(左颈总动脉远端边缘与左颈总动脉开口中点之间的距离)。结论:这项适用性研究强调了TBE内移植物对胸主动脉病变治疗的兴趣,证明了其在广泛的临床环境中的适用性。这种内移植物的临床意义仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANATOMIC SUITABILITY OF LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY OFF-THE-SHELF BRANCH GRAFT IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING.

Background: This study aimed to analyze the anatomical suitability of thoracic branch endoprothesis (TBE), an "off-the-shelf" stent graft, in routine practice at a tertiary French hospital.

Methods: This was a single center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. We included patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in zone 2, or in zone 3 with the lesion located <30 mm from the left subclavian artery (LSA), between 2010 and 2024. The morphological parameters of the aorta were measured, and eligibility for TBE (WL Gore, Phoenix, USA) placement was evaluated according to the manufacturer's instructions for use.

Results: From the 210 TEVAR procedures performed during the study period, 97 patients were included. These patients were predominantly male (80.4%), with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 44.0-73.0). Emergency TEVAR was performed in 79.4% of cases. TBE placement was anatomically suitable in 82.5% (80/97) of included cases and in 38.1% (80/210) of all TEVAR procedures. The most frequent cause of anatomical unsuitability was proximal segment length (distance between the distal edge of the LSA and the mid-point of the ostium of the left common carotid artery <20 mm) in 9.3% of cases. Although the aortic and LSA diameters were smaller in patients treated for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury, the rate of unsuitability of TBE placement due to anatomical characteristics was similar whatever the underlying disease.

Conclusions: This eligibility study highlights the interest of TBE endografts for the management of thoracic aortic lesions, demonstrating their suitability in a wide range of clinical settings. The clinical relevance of this endograft remains to be determined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信