食道运动对脊柱转移瘤保食管放疗的剂量学影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anna Mann Nielsen, Laura Ann Rechner, Sebastian Moretto Krog, Vanja Gram, Morten Hiul Suppli, Patrik Sibolt, Ivan Richter Vogelius, Claus P Behrens, Gitte Fredberg Persson
{"title":"食道运动对脊柱转移瘤保食管放疗的剂量学影响。","authors":"Anna Mann Nielsen, Laura Ann Rechner, Sebastian Moretto Krog, Vanja Gram, Morten Hiul Suppli, Patrik Sibolt, Ivan Richter Vogelius, Claus P Behrens, Gitte Fredberg Persson","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The phase III trial (NCT05109819) investigates whether esophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) reduces dysphagia in patients with spinal metastases. This retrospective simulation study evaluates the dosimetric impact of inter-fractional esophageal motion in this setting. Patient/materials and methods: Patients receiving daily image-guided RT on high-quality cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-equipped units between September 2023 and December 2024 were screened. Inclusion required five consecutive CBCTs with vertebrae T1-T10 in view and a visible esophagus. The esophagus was contoured on the planning CT (pCT) and five CBCTs. Standard and esophagus-sparing 25 Gy/5 fraction volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were simulated for five thoracic targets. In esophagus-sparing plans, the esophageal D0.027cc was limited to 8 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (α/β = 3 Gy), consistent with the ESO-SPARE constraint. CBCT-based esophagus contours were rigidly transferred to the pCT after bony matching. Esophageal metrics (Mean, D0.027cc-D5cc, V8.5 Gy) were extracted from the original plan and compared across CBCT and pCT contours and between plan types. Inter-fraction motion was assessed using 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD). CBCT quality was evaluated in two patients (five targets) using Dice similarity coefficients and interobserver 95% HDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients with 23 targets were simulated. Inter-fraction motion led to dose constraint violations in 20 of 23 plans, though only small esophageal volumes entered the high-dose region. Dice scores > 0.8 confirmed good esophageal visibility on CBCT. Most 95% HDs fell within interobserver variability, indicating motion was comparable to contouring uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite constraint violations, high-dose exposure was limited to small esophageal volumes, and overall sparing was preserved.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1276-1284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric impact of esophageal motion in esophagus-sparing radiotherapy of spinal metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Mann Nielsen, Laura Ann Rechner, Sebastian Moretto Krog, Vanja Gram, Morten Hiul Suppli, Patrik Sibolt, Ivan Richter Vogelius, Claus P Behrens, Gitte Fredberg Persson\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The phase III trial (NCT05109819) investigates whether esophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) reduces dysphagia in patients with spinal metastases. This retrospective simulation study evaluates the dosimetric impact of inter-fractional esophageal motion in this setting. Patient/materials and methods: Patients receiving daily image-guided RT on high-quality cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-equipped units between September 2023 and December 2024 were screened. Inclusion required five consecutive CBCTs with vertebrae T1-T10 in view and a visible esophagus. The esophagus was contoured on the planning CT (pCT) and five CBCTs. Standard and esophagus-sparing 25 Gy/5 fraction volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were simulated for five thoracic targets. In esophagus-sparing plans, the esophageal D0.027cc was limited to 8 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (α/β = 3 Gy), consistent with the ESO-SPARE constraint. CBCT-based esophagus contours were rigidly transferred to the pCT after bony matching. Esophageal metrics (Mean, D0.027cc-D5cc, V8.5 Gy) were extracted from the original plan and compared across CBCT and pCT contours and between plan types. Inter-fraction motion was assessed using 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD). CBCT quality was evaluated in two patients (five targets) using Dice similarity coefficients and interobserver 95% HDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients with 23 targets were simulated. Inter-fraction motion led to dose constraint violations in 20 of 23 plans, though only small esophageal volumes entered the high-dose region. Dice scores > 0.8 confirmed good esophageal visibility on CBCT. Most 95% HDs fell within interobserver variability, indicating motion was comparable to contouring uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite constraint violations, high-dose exposure was limited to small esophageal volumes, and overall sparing was preserved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"1276-1284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476049/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:该III期试验(NCT05109819)研究了保留食管放疗(RT)是否能减轻脊柱转移患者的吞咽困难。这项回顾性模拟研究评估了在这种情况下食道间隔运动的剂量学影响。患者/材料和方法:筛选2023年9月至2024年12月期间在配备高质量锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的设备上每日接受图像引导RT的患者。纳入需要连续5次cbct检查,椎骨T1-T10可见,食管可见。在计划CT (pCT)和5个cbct上勾画食道轮廓。对5个胸部靶点进行标准和保留食道的25 Gy/5分数体积调节弧治疗方案的模拟。在食道保护计划中,食道D0.027cc被限制在8 Gy当量剂量的2 Gy分数(α/β = 3 Gy),与ESO-SPARE约束一致。基于cbct的食管轮廓在骨匹配后刚性转移到pCT。从原始方案中提取食管指标(平均值,D0.027cc-D5cc, V8.5 Gy),并在CBCT和pCT轮廓线以及方案类型之间进行比较。采用95% Hausdorff Distance (HD)评估分数间运动。采用Dice相似系数和观察者间95% hd对2例患者(5个靶点)的CBCT质量进行评价。结果:模拟了12例患者23个靶点。在23个方案中,有20个方案的分数间运动导致剂量限制违规,尽管只有小食道容积进入高剂量区。Dice评分>.8证实CBCT上食管可见性良好。95%的hd在观察者间可变性范围内,表明运动与轮廓不确定性相当。解释:尽管违反了约束,但高剂量暴露仅限于小食道容积,整体保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dosimetric impact of esophageal motion in esophagus-sparing radiotherapy of spinal metastases.

Background and purpose: The phase III trial (NCT05109819) investigates whether esophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) reduces dysphagia in patients with spinal metastases. This retrospective simulation study evaluates the dosimetric impact of inter-fractional esophageal motion in this setting. Patient/materials and methods: Patients receiving daily image-guided RT on high-quality cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-equipped units between September 2023 and December 2024 were screened. Inclusion required five consecutive CBCTs with vertebrae T1-T10 in view and a visible esophagus. The esophagus was contoured on the planning CT (pCT) and five CBCTs. Standard and esophagus-sparing 25 Gy/5 fraction volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were simulated for five thoracic targets. In esophagus-sparing plans, the esophageal D0.027cc was limited to 8 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (α/β = 3 Gy), consistent with the ESO-SPARE constraint. CBCT-based esophagus contours were rigidly transferred to the pCT after bony matching. Esophageal metrics (Mean, D0.027cc-D5cc, V8.5 Gy) were extracted from the original plan and compared across CBCT and pCT contours and between plan types. Inter-fraction motion was assessed using 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD). CBCT quality was evaluated in two patients (five targets) using Dice similarity coefficients and interobserver 95% HDs.

Results: Twelve patients with 23 targets were simulated. Inter-fraction motion led to dose constraint violations in 20 of 23 plans, though only small esophageal volumes entered the high-dose region. Dice scores > 0.8 confirmed good esophageal visibility on CBCT. Most 95% HDs fell within interobserver variability, indicating motion was comparable to contouring uncertainty.

Interpretation: Despite constraint violations, high-dose exposure was limited to small esophageal volumes, and overall sparing was preserved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信