日本心脏再同步化治疗患者心肺运动试验可用性的影响因素

IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Satoshi Kuhara, Ryutaro Matsugaki, Hideaki Itoh, Yasushi Oginosawa, Kiyohide Fushimi, Shinya Matsuda, Satoru Saeki
{"title":"日本心脏再同步化治疗患者心肺运动试验可用性的影响因素","authors":"Satoshi Kuhara,&nbsp;Ryutaro Matsugaki,&nbsp;Hideaki Itoh,&nbsp;Yasushi Oginosawa,&nbsp;Kiyohide Fushimi,&nbsp;Shinya Matsuda,&nbsp;Satoru Saeki","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the implementation rate of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), as well as the associated factors, using real-world data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the Diagnostic Procedure Combination System in Japan (2014–2018) was analyzed. The participants were cardiac patients who underwent CRT or CRT-D device implantation (<i>n</i> = 3859). The primary outcome was whether CPET was performed after device implantation. Unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the characteristics of the CPET (+) and CPET (−) groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with CPET performance. CPET was performed in 134 patients (3%). The CPET (−) group was older and had lower Barthel Index (BI) scores at discharge. CPET (+) patients had a higher rate of cardiac rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis revealed that age &lt; 70 years and BI score ≥ 85 at discharge were associated with CPET implementation. In-hospital cardiac rehabilitation is also an important determinant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The CPET implementation after CRT or CRT-D was low. Emphasizing the importance of CPET may improve these rates. Future studies should explore strategies to increase its use in this patient population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70198","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing the Availability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Kuhara,&nbsp;Ryutaro Matsugaki,&nbsp;Hideaki Itoh,&nbsp;Yasushi Oginosawa,&nbsp;Kiyohide Fushimi,&nbsp;Shinya Matsuda,&nbsp;Satoru Saeki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.70198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to investigate the implementation rate of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), as well as the associated factors, using real-world data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from the Diagnostic Procedure Combination System in Japan (2014–2018) was analyzed. The participants were cardiac patients who underwent CRT or CRT-D device implantation (<i>n</i> = 3859). The primary outcome was whether CPET was performed after device implantation. Unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the characteristics of the CPET (+) and CPET (−) groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with CPET performance. CPET was performed in 134 patients (3%). The CPET (−) group was older and had lower Barthel Index (BI) scores at discharge. CPET (+) patients had a higher rate of cardiac rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis revealed that age &lt; 70 years and BI score ≥ 85 at discharge were associated with CPET implementation. In-hospital cardiac rehabilitation is also an important determinant.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The CPET implementation after CRT or CRT-D was low. Emphasizing the importance of CPET may improve these rates. Future studies should explore strategies to increase its use in this patient population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70198\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用真实数据,探讨心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)或心脏再同步化治疗-除颤器(CRT- d)患者心肺运动试验(CPET)的实施率及其相关因素。方法与结果对日本2014-2018年诊断程序组合系统数据进行分析。参与者为接受CRT或CRT- d装置植入的心脏病患者(n = 3859)。主要观察指标为器械植入后是否进行CPET检查。采用非配对t检验和卡方检验比较CPET(+)组和CPET(-)组的特征。多变量分析用于确定与CPET性能相关的因素。134例(3%)患者行CPET检查。CPET(−)组患者年龄较大,出院时Barthel指数(BI)评分较低。CPET(+)患者心脏康复率较高。多因素分析显示,年龄70岁和出院时BI评分≥85与CPET实施相关。住院心脏康复也是一个重要的决定因素。结论CRT或CRT- d后CPET的实施率较低。强调CPET的重要性可能会提高这些比率。未来的研究应该探索在这一患者群体中增加其使用的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors Influencing the Availability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Japan

Factors Influencing the Availability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Japan

Background

This study aimed to investigate the implementation rate of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), as well as the associated factors, using real-world data.

Methods and Results

Data from the Diagnostic Procedure Combination System in Japan (2014–2018) was analyzed. The participants were cardiac patients who underwent CRT or CRT-D device implantation (n = 3859). The primary outcome was whether CPET was performed after device implantation. Unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the characteristics of the CPET (+) and CPET (−) groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with CPET performance. CPET was performed in 134 patients (3%). The CPET (−) group was older and had lower Barthel Index (BI) scores at discharge. CPET (+) patients had a higher rate of cardiac rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis revealed that age < 70 years and BI score ≥ 85 at discharge were associated with CPET implementation. In-hospital cardiac rehabilitation is also an important determinant.

Conclusions

The CPET implementation after CRT or CRT-D was low. Emphasizing the importance of CPET may improve these rates. Future studies should explore strategies to increase its use in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信