Publio Cesar Cavalcante Viana, Marcelo Araújo Queiroz, Fabio Oliveira Ferreira, Adriano Basso Dias, Natally Horvat, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Giuliano Betoni Guglielmetti, Rafael Ferreira Coelho, Leonardo Cardili, José Pontes Jr, William Carlos Nahas, Giovanni Guido Cerri
{"title":"多参数MRI结合PSA密度作为主动监测前列腺癌的无创排除策略","authors":"Publio Cesar Cavalcante Viana, Marcelo Araújo Queiroz, Fabio Oliveira Ferreira, Adriano Basso Dias, Natally Horvat, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Giuliano Betoni Guglielmetti, Rafael Ferreira Coelho, Leonardo Cardili, José Pontes Jr, William Carlos Nahas, Giovanni Guido Cerri","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), mpMRI combined with PSA density (PSAd) and combined biopsy (CBx) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing active surveillance, using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this prospective single-centre study, 91 patients with low-risk prostate cancer under active surveillance underwent mpMRI, PSAd measurement, CBx and ultimately RP. mpMRI was reported using PI-RADS v2.0, and PSAd was dichotomised at 0.12 ng/ml/cm<sup>3</sup>. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using ISUP grade ≥2 and ≥3 thresholds. Radical prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For detecting ISUP ≥3 cancer, mpMRI combined with PSAd achieved the highest sensitivity (93.3%) and negative predictive value (94.4%). CBx demonstrated the highest specificity (88.2%) and overall diagnostic balance (Youden index = 0.348). mpMRI alone showed intermediate performance. Differences in classification between strategies were statistically significant (McNemar p < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>mpMRI combined with PSAd provides high sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out aggressive prostate cancer, supporting its use as a non-invasive triage tool in active surveillance. CBx remains the most specific method for histological confirmation. These strategies should be used complementarily to optimise decision-making in active surveillance protocols.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiparametric MRI combined with PSA density as a noninvasive rule-out strategy in active surveillance for prostate cancer\",\"authors\":\"Publio Cesar Cavalcante Viana, Marcelo Araújo Queiroz, Fabio Oliveira Ferreira, Adriano Basso Dias, Natally Horvat, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Giuliano Betoni Guglielmetti, Rafael Ferreira Coelho, Leonardo Cardili, José Pontes Jr, William Carlos Nahas, Giovanni Guido Cerri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), mpMRI combined with PSA density (PSAd) and combined biopsy (CBx) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing active surveillance, using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this prospective single-centre study, 91 patients with low-risk prostate cancer under active surveillance underwent mpMRI, PSAd measurement, CBx and ultimately RP. mpMRI was reported using PI-RADS v2.0, and PSAd was dichotomised at 0.12 ng/ml/cm<sup>3</sup>. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using ISUP grade ≥2 and ≥3 thresholds. Radical prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>For detecting ISUP ≥3 cancer, mpMRI combined with PSAd achieved the highest sensitivity (93.3%) and negative predictive value (94.4%). CBx demonstrated the highest specificity (88.2%) and overall diagnostic balance (Youden index = 0.348). mpMRI alone showed intermediate performance. Differences in classification between strategies were statistically significant (McNemar p < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>mpMRI combined with PSAd provides high sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out aggressive prostate cancer, supporting its use as a non-invasive triage tool in active surveillance. CBx remains the most specific method for histological confirmation. These strategies should be used complementarily to optimise decision-making in active surveillance protocols.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)、mpMRI联合PSA密度(PSAd)和联合活检(CBx)对主动监测男性临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的诊断价值,并以根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本为参考标准。在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,91名低风险前列腺癌患者在主动监测下接受了mpMRI、PSAd测量、CBx和最终RP。使用PI-RADS v2.0报告mpMRI, PSAd分为0.12 ng/ml/cm3。采用ISUP分级≥2和≥3阈值比较诊断准确性。以根治性前列腺切除术病理为参考标准。结果mpMRI联合PSAd对ISUP≥3级肿瘤的检测灵敏度最高(93.3%),阴性预测值最高(94.4%)。CBx表现出最高的特异性(88.2%)和总体诊断平衡(约登指数= 0.348)。mpMRI单独显示中等表现。不同策略的分类差异有统计学意义(McNemar p < 0.001)。结论mpMRI联合PSAd对排除侵袭性前列腺癌具有较高的敏感性和阴性预测值,支持其作为主动监测的无创分诊工具。CBx仍然是组织学证实的最具体方法。这些策略应相互补充,以优化主动监测协议中的决策。
Multiparametric MRI combined with PSA density as a noninvasive rule-out strategy in active surveillance for prostate cancer
Objective
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), mpMRI combined with PSA density (PSAd) and combined biopsy (CBx) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing active surveillance, using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard.
Patients and Methods
In this prospective single-centre study, 91 patients with low-risk prostate cancer under active surveillance underwent mpMRI, PSAd measurement, CBx and ultimately RP. mpMRI was reported using PI-RADS v2.0, and PSAd was dichotomised at 0.12 ng/ml/cm3. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using ISUP grade ≥2 and ≥3 thresholds. Radical prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard.
Results
For detecting ISUP ≥3 cancer, mpMRI combined with PSAd achieved the highest sensitivity (93.3%) and negative predictive value (94.4%). CBx demonstrated the highest specificity (88.2%) and overall diagnostic balance (Youden index = 0.348). mpMRI alone showed intermediate performance. Differences in classification between strategies were statistically significant (McNemar p < 0.001).
Conclusions
mpMRI combined with PSAd provides high sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out aggressive prostate cancer, supporting its use as a non-invasive triage tool in active surveillance. CBx remains the most specific method for histological confirmation. These strategies should be used complementarily to optimise decision-making in active surveillance protocols.