Fredrik Liedberg, Oskar Hagberg, Christel Häggström, Firas Aljabery, Truls Gårdmark, Staffan Jahnson, Tomas Jerlström, Viveka Ströck, Karin Söderkvist, Anders Ullén, Lars Holmberg, Johannes Bobjer
{"title":"上尿路上皮癌的诊断和切除手术等待时间与生存和分期进展的关系","authors":"Fredrik Liedberg, Oskar Hagberg, Christel Häggström, Firas Aljabery, Truls Gårdmark, Staffan Jahnson, Tomas Jerlström, Viveka Ströck, Karin Söderkvist, Anders Ullén, Lars Holmberg, Johannes Bobjer","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the association between waiting time and outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied a population-based cohort of 858 patients in BladderBaSe 2.0 subjected to extirpative surgery for UTUC 2015–2019 in Sweden. Diagnostic waiting time (from referral to diagnosis, reference <1 week), treatment waiting time (from diagnosis to surgery, reference <5 weeks) and total waiting time (reference <10 weeks) were investigated in relation to disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) by multivariable Cox regression models. To further explore these associations, stage progression from preoperatively recorded clinical tumour stage to pathological tumour stage in the extirpated specimen was assessed by logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Total waiting time was not associated with DSS, OS or stage progression. A diagnostic waiting time between 1 and 4 weeks was associated with better DSS (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35–0.94]) and OS (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.41–0.87]). In the strata of patients with UTUC in the renal pelvis, a diagnostic waiting time > 4 weeks was associated with stage progression (OR 2.44 [95% CI 1.00–5.95]), and in patients with UTUC in the ureter, a treatment waiting time between 5 and 10 weeks was associated to worse DSS (HR 2.85 (95% CI 1.03–7.89).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In general, shorter care pathways were linked to beneficial survival estimates, yet some estimates may be influenced by selection bias due to prioritizing short waiting times for patients with advanced and/or overt symptomatic tumours. Stage progression with increased waiting time may indicate an underlying causal mechanism.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70093","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waiting time in diagnosis and extirpative surgery and association with survival and stage progression in upper tract urothelial carcinomas\",\"authors\":\"Fredrik Liedberg, Oskar Hagberg, Christel Häggström, Firas Aljabery, Truls Gårdmark, Staffan Jahnson, Tomas Jerlström, Viveka Ströck, Karin Söderkvist, Anders Ullén, Lars Holmberg, Johannes Bobjer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.70093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the association between waiting time and outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We studied a population-based cohort of 858 patients in BladderBaSe 2.0 subjected to extirpative surgery for UTUC 2015–2019 in Sweden. Diagnostic waiting time (from referral to diagnosis, reference <1 week), treatment waiting time (from diagnosis to surgery, reference <5 weeks) and total waiting time (reference <10 weeks) were investigated in relation to disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) by multivariable Cox regression models. To further explore these associations, stage progression from preoperatively recorded clinical tumour stage to pathological tumour stage in the extirpated specimen was assessed by logistic regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Total waiting time was not associated with DSS, OS or stage progression. A diagnostic waiting time between 1 and 4 weeks was associated with better DSS (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35–0.94]) and OS (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.41–0.87]). In the strata of patients with UTUC in the renal pelvis, a diagnostic waiting time > 4 weeks was associated with stage progression (OR 2.44 [95% CI 1.00–5.95]), and in patients with UTUC in the ureter, a treatment waiting time between 5 and 10 weeks was associated to worse DSS (HR 2.85 (95% CI 1.03–7.89).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In general, shorter care pathways were linked to beneficial survival estimates, yet some estimates may be influenced by selection bias due to prioritizing short waiting times for patients with advanced and/or overt symptomatic tumours. Stage progression with increased waiting time may indicate an underlying causal mechanism.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70093\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者等待时间与预后的关系。患者和方法我们研究了一项基于人群的队列研究,在2015-2019年瑞典UTUC期间,在BladderBaSe 2.0中接受切除手术的858例患者。通过多变量Cox回归模型研究诊断等待时间(从转诊到诊断,参考文献1周)、治疗等待时间(从诊断到手术,参考文献5周)和总等待时间(参考文献10周)与疾病特异性(DSS)和总生存期(OS)的关系。为了进一步探讨这些关联,通过逻辑回归评估切除标本从术前记录的临床肿瘤分期到病理肿瘤分期的分期进展。结果总等待时间与DSS、OS或分期进展无关。诊断等待时间在1至4周之间与更好的DSS (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35-0.94])和OS (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.41-0.87])相关。在肾盂UTUC患者中,诊断等待时间为4周与分期进展相关(OR 2.44 [95% CI 1.00-5.95]),而在输尿管UTUC患者中,等待治疗时间为5 - 10周与更差的DSS相关(HR 2.85 (95% CI 1.03-7.89)。总的来说,较短的治疗路径与有益的生存估计有关,但由于优先考虑晚期和/或明显症状肿瘤患者的较短等待时间,一些估计可能受到选择偏倚的影响。等待时间增加的阶段进展可能表明潜在的因果机制。
Waiting time in diagnosis and extirpative surgery and association with survival and stage progression in upper tract urothelial carcinomas
Objectives
To investigate the association between waiting time and outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC).
Patients and methods
We studied a population-based cohort of 858 patients in BladderBaSe 2.0 subjected to extirpative surgery for UTUC 2015–2019 in Sweden. Diagnostic waiting time (from referral to diagnosis, reference <1 week), treatment waiting time (from diagnosis to surgery, reference <5 weeks) and total waiting time (reference <10 weeks) were investigated in relation to disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) by multivariable Cox regression models. To further explore these associations, stage progression from preoperatively recorded clinical tumour stage to pathological tumour stage in the extirpated specimen was assessed by logistic regression.
Results
Total waiting time was not associated with DSS, OS or stage progression. A diagnostic waiting time between 1 and 4 weeks was associated with better DSS (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35–0.94]) and OS (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.41–0.87]). In the strata of patients with UTUC in the renal pelvis, a diagnostic waiting time > 4 weeks was associated with stage progression (OR 2.44 [95% CI 1.00–5.95]), and in patients with UTUC in the ureter, a treatment waiting time between 5 and 10 weeks was associated to worse DSS (HR 2.85 (95% CI 1.03–7.89).
Conclusions
In general, shorter care pathways were linked to beneficial survival estimates, yet some estimates may be influenced by selection bias due to prioritizing short waiting times for patients with advanced and/or overt symptomatic tumours. Stage progression with increased waiting time may indicate an underlying causal mechanism.